Advertisement

Employment of Unwed Mothers: The Role of Government and Social Support

  • Michelle M. LivermoreEmail author
  • Rebecca S. Powers
Article

Abstract

This paper assesses which types of government and social support predict employment among unwed mothers the year after childbirth. We performed logistic regression analysis on a nationally-representative, mother-only subset of the Fragile Families public-use baseline and 1-year follow-up data. Unwed mothers were more likely to be employed if they received WIC, employment agency assistance, or instrumental social support. They were less likely to be employed if they received TANF, food stamps, housing subsidies, SSI, public housing, or cohabited with a partner. Targeted nutrition programs, employment agencies, and instrumental social support seemed to facilitate employment. Other social programs and cohabiting either served as disincentives to work or gave unwed mothers the option to remain home, depending on the perspective taken.

Keywords

Employment Government support Social support Unwed mothers 

References

  1. Bendheim-Thoman Center for Research on Child Wellbeing. (CRCW). (2002). Introduction to the fragile families public use baseline data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Retrieved April 23, 2002 from http://crcw.princeton.edu/fragilefamilies/publications.aspGoogle Scholar
  2. Bendheim-Thoman Center for Research on Child Wellbeing. (CRCW). (2003). Introduction to the fragile families one-year public use data. [Electronic Version] Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Retrieved March 24, 2004 from http://crcw.princeton.edu/fragilefamilies/publications.aspGoogle Scholar
  3. Bok, M., & Simmons, L. (2002). Post-welfare reform, low-income families and the dissolution of the safety net. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(3), 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crittenden, K. S., Kim, S., Watanabe, S. K., & Norr, K. F. (2002). Welfare, work and well-being among inner-city mothers. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 23(1–2), 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Work, welfare, and single mother’s economic survival strategies. American Sociological Review, 62, 253–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elliott, M., & Packham, J. F. (1998). When do single mothers work?: An analysis of 1990 census data. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 25, 39–60.Google Scholar
  7. England, P. (1992). Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Food and Nutrition Service. (2004). About WIC. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved April 29, 2004 from http://www.fns.usda.gov/wicGoogle Scholar
  9. Harris, K. M. (1993). Work and welfare among single mothers in poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 317–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hays, S. (2003). Flat broke with children: Women in the age of welfare reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jackson, A. P., Tienda, M., & Huang, C. (2001). Capabilities and employability of unwed mothers. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(4/5), 327–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jutta, J. M. (1994). Children and the timing of women’s paid work after childbirth: A further specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1999). Job continuity among new mothers. Demography, 36, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LeRoy, B. W., & Johnson, D. M. (2002). Open road or blind alley? Welfare reform, mothers, and children with disabilities. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 23(4), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lichter, D. T., & Jayakody, R. (2002). Welfare reform: How do we measure success? Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 117–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks, N. F., & McLanahan, S. S. (1993). Gender, family structure, and social support among parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McLaughlin, S. D. (1982). Differential patterns of female labor-force participation surrounding the first birth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44(2), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Monroe, P. A., & Tiller, V. V. (2001). Commitment to work among welfare-reliant women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63(3), 816–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Monroe, P. A., Blalock, L. B., & Vlosky, R. P. (1999). Work opportunities in a non-traditional setting for women exiting welfare: A case study. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20(1), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Connell, M. (1990). Maternity leave arrangements: 1961–1985. In Work and family patterns of American women (pp. 11–57) (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports Series P-23, No. 165). Washington DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  21. O’Hara, B. J. (2002). Work and work-related activities of mothers receiving temporary assistance to needy families: 1996, 1998, and 2000. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, May, 70–85.Google Scholar
  22. Parish, W. L., Hao, L., & Hogan, D. P. (1991). Family support networks, welfare, and work among young mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Powers, R. S., & Livermore, M. M. (2003). Will unwed mothers seek employment? The role of government and social support. Gender Issues, 21(4), 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith, K., Downs, B., & O’Connell, M. (2001). Maternity leave and employment patterns: 1961–1995. U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Reports, November, P70–P79.Google Scholar
  26. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2003). Statistical abstract of the United States: 2003. Table 597 (pp. 391). Washington DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Employment situation explanatory note. Retrieved March 20, 2005, from http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.tn.htmGoogle Scholar
  28. U.S. Congress. (1996). Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996: Conference report. (House of Representatives Report 104–725). Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations