Advertisement

Accessing basic education in Romania: Possibilities and limitations for NGOs working for educational change for Roma children

  • Solvor Mjøberg LauritzenEmail author
Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The Roma are facing serious disadvantages in education in Romania, where segregated schooling and lack of quality education are two main factors contributing to de facto exclusion from the education system. In an effort to compensate for this missing commitment of the formal education system, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) provide non-formal education for Roma children, often under the label ‘afterschools’. This paper explores the work of an NGO running an after-school programme for out-of-school Roma children in Romania. While the after-school programme started out providing the children with informal education, it soon became involved in enrolling the children in a second-chance school. This process of enrolment is analysed as a three-stage process in this paper: preparing for access, providing physical access and supporting continuous access. Despite success in enrolling children into the formal education system, the approach taken by the NGO and the second-chance school had serious flaws. In particular, this paper discusses the lack of a child-friendly environment, compromised safety for the children, a lack of cultural sensitivity, racist attitudes towards the children and a pedagogy that did not give the children a fair chance to succeed in their education. These flaws are used to discuss the possibilities and limitations for NGOs to bring about educational change. This paper argues that while such programmes can do more harm than good, they can also use their knowledge and position to advocate for change in the formal education system.

Keywords

Roma Informal education After-school programmes Second-chance schools NGOs 

Notes

References

  1. Bolognesi, I. (2010). School success and professional achievement of three women of Serbian-Rom, Italian-Sinti and Albanian-Ashkali origin. Intercultural Education,21, 443–447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2010.521379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brüggermann, C. (2014). Romani culture and academic success: Arguments against the belief in a contradiction. Intercultural Education,25, 439–452.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2014.990229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brüggermann, C., & Friedman, E. (2017). The decade of roma inclusion: Origins, actors, and legacies. European Education,49, 1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10564934.2017.1290422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cosden, M., Morrison, G., Albanese, A. L., & Macias, S. (2001). When homework is not home work: After-school programs for homework assistance. Educational Psychologist,36(3), 211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curcic, S., Miskovic, M., Plaut, S., & Ceobanu, C. (2014). Inclusion, integration and perpetual exclusion? A critical examination of the Decade of Roma Inclusion, 2005–2015. European Educational Research Journal,13(3), 257–267.  https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.3.257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. D’Arcy, K. (2014). Home education, school, travellers and educational inclusion. British Journal of Sociology of Education,35, 818–835.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.919840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Derrington, C. (2007). Fight, flight and playing white: An examination of coping strategies adopted by Gypsy Traveller adolescents in English secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Research,46, 357–367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliason, A. (2017). With no deliberate speed: The segregation of Roma children in Europe. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law,27(191), 191–241.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission. (2017). Communication from the commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Midterm review of the EU framework for national Roma integration strategies. Retrieved 14 Oct 2019 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2017/0458/COM_COM(2017)0458_EN.pdf.
  10. FRA. (2016). Second European union minorities and discrimination survey. RomaSelected findings. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 14 Oct 2019 https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2016/eumidis-ii-roma-selected-findings.
  11. Giurca, D., Rusu, M., Stoian, I., Ilie, S., Toma, S., & Arsu, A. (2012). Roma inclusion in Romania: Policies, institutions and examples. Bucuresti, Romania: Fundatia Soros Romania.Google Scholar
  12. Halpern, R. (1999). After-school programs for low-income children: Promise and challenges. The Future of Children,9(2), 81–95.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1602708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Igarashi, K. (2005). Support programmes for Roma children: Do they help or promote exclusion? Intercultural Education,16, 443–452.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980500378508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klaus, S., & Marsh, A. (2014). A special challenge for Europe: The inclusion of Roma children in early years education and care. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal,22, 336–346.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2014.912896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kyuchukov, H. (2011). Roma girls: Between traditional values and educational aspirations. Intercultural Education,22, 97–104.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2011.549648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lauritzen, S. M., & Nodeland, T. S. (2018). “What is the problem represented to be?” Two decades of research on Roma and education in Europe. Educational Research Review, 24, 148–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macura-Milovanović, S., Munda, M., & Peček, M. (2013). Roma pupils’ identification with school in Slovenia and Serbia: Case studies. Educational Studies,39, 483–502.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.801768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Matache, M., & Oehlke, K. (2017). A critical analysis of roma policy and praxis: The Romanian case. In J. Bhaba, A. Mirga, & M. Matache (Eds.), Realizing Roma rights (pp. 97–114). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  19. Messing, V. (2008). Good practices addressing school integration of Roma/Gypsy children in Hungary. Intercultural Education,19, 461–473.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980802531721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mirga, A. (2017). Roma policy in Europe: Results and challenges. In J. Bhaba, A. Mirga, & M. Matache (Eds.), Realizing Roma rights (pp. 115–126). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  21. New, W. (2011). Stigma and Roma education policy reform in Slovakia. European Education,43(4), 45–61.  https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934430403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nicolae, V. (2007). Perfectly equipped failures: The European Union and educational issues affecting the Roma. European Education,39(1), 50–63.  https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934390103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pantea, M.-C. (2015). Affirmative action in Romania’s higher education: Roma students’ perceived meanings and dilemmas. British Journal of Sociology of Education,36(6), 896–914.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.869172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosta, I., & Kostka, J. (2014). Structural dimensions of Roma school desegregation policies in Central and Eastern Europe. European Educational Research Journal,13(3), 268–281.  https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.3.268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rozzi, E. (2017). Roma children and educational exclusion in Italy. In J. Bhaba, A. Mirga, & M. Matache (Eds.), Realizing Roma rights (pp. 17–38). Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ryder, A. R., Rostas, I., & Taba, M. (2014). ‘Nothing about us without us’: The role of inclusive community development in school desegregation for Roma communities. Race, Ethnicity and Education,17(4), 518–539.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.885426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sava, S. (2008). Trends in adult and continuing education in Romania, a country in transformation. REPORT—Zeitschrift für Weiterbildungsforschung,31(2), 28–38.  https://doi.org/10.3278/rep0802w028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stoilescu, D., & Carapanait, G. (2011). Renegotiating relations among teacher, community, and students. European Education,43(2), 54–73.  https://doi.org/10.2753/EUE1056-4934430203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trehan, N. (2009). Human rights entrepeneurship in post-socialist Hungary: From the ‘Gypsy problem’ to ‘Romani rights’ (unpublished doctoral dissertation). London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London.Google Scholar
  30. Yasunaga, M. (2014). Non-formal education as a means to meet learning needs of out-of-school children and adolescents. UNICEF and UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 14 Oct 2019 http://ais.volumesquared.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/OOSC-2014-Non-formal-education-for-OOSC-final.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and SocietyMajorstuen, OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations