Accountability and trust: Two sides of the same coin?
Trust and accountability are often positioned as opposites, the argument being that accountability is based on distrust and correction of identified deficiencies. Yet, trust is also important in order for accountability to lead to improvement; only when teachers and principals are open about the quality of their teaching and their school can there be a meaningful discussion about change. How can we overcome this dilemma? This paper will address the inextricable interaction between trust and accountability, presenting examples from a study in South Africa of how external control in a setting of distrust can undermine agency and improvement, and how high levels of trust can promote more effective accountability relationships. Our study provides relevant insights into why some education systems are unable to generate, evaluate and scale innovations in learning when a lack of trust and capacity leads to strong opposition to external accountability, and when strong bureaucratic accountability creates further inefficiencies in pressurizing educators across the education system to report and monitor on various aspects of education where these efforts do not actually improve the quality of teaching in the classroom or provide information on good practices.
KeywordsAccountability Trust System reform
This work was funded by the ESRC-DfID; Grant Number ES/P005888/1.
References marked with an * were included in phase 4 of your synthesis
- Anderson, J. A. (2005). Accountability in education. Paris/Brussels: Unesco.Google Scholar
- Barrera, D., Buskens, V., & Raub, W. (2015). Embedded trust: The analytical approach in vignettes, laboratory experiments and surveys. In F. Lyon, G. Mőllering, & M. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Cameron, R., & Naidoo, V. (2018). Education policymaking at national level: The politics of multiple pricipals. In B. Levy, R. Cameron, U. Hoadley, & V. Naidoo (Eds.), The politics and governance of basic education: A tale of two South African provinces (pp. 61–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.*Google Scholar
- Carnoy, M., Chisholm, L., & Chilisa, B. (2012). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. Cape Town: hSRC Press.Google Scholar
- Chisholm, L., Hoadley, U., & Kivilu, M., (2005). Educator workload in South Africa. Report prepared for the Educator Labour Relations Council, Pretoria, Human.Google Scholar
- Christie, P., & Monyokolo, M. (Eds.). (2018). Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: The Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017. Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar
- Corruption Watch. (2017). 2016 annual report. https://www.corruptionwatch.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Corruption-Watch-Annual-Report-27-02-2017-Low-Res-Version.pdf. Accessed Nov 2018.
- Crooks, T. (2003). Some criteria for intelligent accountability applied to accountability in New Zealand. In Annual meeting of the American educational research association, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
- De Clercq, F. (2013). Professionalism in South African education: The challenges of developing teacher professional knowledge, practice, identity and voice. Journal of Education,57(2013), 31–54.Google Scholar
- Døssing, H., Mokeki, L., & Weideman, M. (2011). Mapping transparency, accountability and integrity in primary education in South Africa. Berlin: Transparency International. Available at http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/newfunct/pdf/luxembourg_tisda_south_africa_report_web.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2016.
- Eddy-Spicer, D., Ehren, M., Bangpan, M., Khatwa, M., Perrone, F. (2016). Under what conditions do inspection, monitoring and assessment improve system efficiency, service delivery and learning outcomes for the poorest and most marginalised? A realist synthesis of school accountability in low- and middle-income countries. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London. https://www.gov.uk/dfid-research-outputs/protocol-under-what-conditions-do-inspection-monitoring-and-assessment-improve-system-efficiency-service-delivery-and-learning-outcomes-for-the-poorest-and-most-marginalised-a-realist-synthesis-of-school-accountability-in-low-a?cachebust=1481814745. Accessed Nov 2018.
- Hooge, E., Burns, T., & Wilkoszewski, H. (2012). Looking beyond the numbers: Stakeholders and multiple school accountability. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 85, Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k91dl7ct6q6-en.
- Howie, S. (2012). High-stakes testing in South Africa: Friend or foe? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19, 81–98.Google Scholar
- Ikejiaku, B.-V. (2009). ‘Crime’, poverty, political corruption and conflict in apartheid and post apartheid South Africa: The implications on economic development. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations,3(10), 451.Google Scholar
- Klijn, E. J., & Koppejan, J. F. M. (2014). Accountable networks. In: M. Bovens, R. Mark, E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 242–258). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
- McLennan, A., Muller, M., Orkin, M., & Robertson, H. (2018). Chapter 9. District support for curriculum management change in schools. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: The Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 225–255). Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar
- Metcalfe, M. (2018). Chapter 2. Jika iMufundo 2015–2017: Why, what and key learnings. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: the Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 17–74). Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar
- Mills, R. W., & Rubinstein Reiss, D. (2017). The role of trust in the regulation of complex and high-risk industries: The case of the U.S. Federal Aviation administration’s voluntary disclosure programs. In F. Six & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Trust in regulatory regimes (pp. 37–60). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mkhwanazi, T., Ndlovu, Z., Ngema, S., & Bansilal, S. (2018). Chapter 8. Exploring mathematics teachers’ usage of the curriculum planner and tracker in secondary schools in King Cetshwayo and Pinetown districts. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: the Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 195–225). Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar
- Moloi, K. (2007). An overview of education management in South Africa. South African journal of education,27(3), 463–476.*Google Scholar
- Mthembu, T. T. (2014). The role of circuit managers in enhancing instructional leadership practices in schools: A phenomenological approach. A dissertation in partial of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Education in the discipline Education Leadership, Management and Policy in the School of Education. UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU-NATAL Education District.*Google Scholar
- Mthiyane, N., Naidoo, J., & Bertram, C. (2018). Chapter 7. Balancing monitoring and support: The role of HODs in curriculum coverage. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: The Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 169–195). Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar
- Nattrass, N., & Seekings, J. (2001). “ Two nations”? Race and economic inequality in South Africa today. Daedalus,130(1), 45–70.Google Scholar
- NEEDU. (2013). National report. Teaching and learning in rural primary schools. Pretoria: NEEDU. www.education.gov.za/NEEDU/tabid/860/Default.aspx. Accessed Nov 2018.
- Ngidi, D. P. (2004). Educators’ perceptions of the efficiency of school governing bodies. South African Journal of Education,24(4), 260–263.Google Scholar
- Oomsels, P., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Interorganizational trust in Flemish public administration: comparing trusted and distrusted interactions between public regulatees and public regulators. In F. Six, & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Trust in regulatory regimes (p. 80–112).Google Scholar
- Parliamentary research committee. (2018). Provincial Education Departments Performance Indicators: roundtable discussion. Retrieved from Sept 2019, https://pmg.org.za/committeemeeting/25767/.
- Patillo, K. (2012). Quiet corruption: Teachers unions and leadership in South African township schools. Connecticut: A thesis submitted to the faculty of Wesleyan University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts with Departmental Honors from the College of Social Studies.Google Scholar
- Pritchett, L. (2015). Creating education systems coherent for learning outcomes: Making the transition from schooling to learning. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE) Working Paper, Preliminary draft.Google Scholar
- Rex, J., & Mason, D. (1988). Theories of race and ethnic relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Schollar, E. (2018). Chapter 4. Curriculum management, improving learner performance and the rise of multi-grade classes: A tangled web of challenges to the design, operation and evaluation of educational development programmes in South Africa. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: The Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 99–123). Johannesburg: Saide.Google Scholar
- Sissener, T. K. (2001). Anthropological perspectives on corruption. Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute.Google Scholar
- Six, F., & Verhoest, K. (Eds.). (2017). Trust in regulatory regimes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Spaull, N. (2012). SACMEQ at a Glance for 10 African countries. 2 page research note per country.Google Scholar
- Taylor, N. (2017). Report on the implementation evaluation of the national curriculum statement grade R to 12 focusing on the curriculum and assessment policy statements (CAPS). Pretoria: Technical Report.Google Scholar
- Taylor, N., & Robinson, N. (2016). Towards teacher professional knowledge and practice standards in South Africa. Report commissioned by the Centre for Development and Enterprise.*Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., Spaull, N. (2013). The effects of rapidly expanding primary school access on effective learning: The case of Southern and Eastern Africa since 2000 (No. 01/2013).Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., & Yu, D. (2009). The importance of socioeconomic status in determining educational achievement in South Africa. Stellenbosch Economic Working Papers.*Google Scholar
- Van der Berg, S., Spaull, N., Wills, G., Gustafsson, M., & Kotzé, J. (2016). Identifying the binding constraints in education. Report commissioned by the South African Presidency and funded by the European Union’s Programme to Support Pro-Poor Policy Development (PSPPD) initiative.*Google Scholar
- Van der Berg, S., Taylor, S., Gustafsson, M., Spaull, N., & Armstrong, P. (2011). Improving education quality in South Africa. Report for the National Planning Commission. Department of Economics, Stellenbosch University.*Google Scholar
- Van Onselen, G. (2012). How Sadtu and the SACE have damaged accountability in SA education. June, [online], Available: http://inside-politics.org/2012/06/25/how-sadtu-and-the-sace-have-damagedaccountability-in-sa-education/. Accessed June 2013.
- Volmink, J., Gardiner, M., Msimang, S., Nel, P., Moleta, A., Scholtz, G., & Prins, T. (2016). Report of the ministerial task team appointed by minister angie motshekga to investigate allegations into the selling of posts of educators by members of teachers unions and departmental officials in provincial education departments. Department of Basic Education.*Google Scholar
- Wills, G. (2016). An economic perspective on school leadership and teachers’ unions in South Africa. Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch University.Google Scholar
- Witten, A., & Makole, K. (2018). Chapter 3. Leading to improve learning outcomes in the Jika iMfundo campaign. In P. Christie & M. Monyokolo (Eds.), Learning about sustainable change in education in South Africa: the Jika iMfundo campaign 2015–2017 (pp. 75–95). Johannesburg: Saide.*Google Scholar