Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 511–538 | Cite as

How teachers can improve their classroom interaction with students: New findings from teachers themselves

  • Ksenia Solheim
  • Sigrun K. Ertesvåg
  • Grete Dalhaug Berg
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Teachers are the most important agents in shaping education for students and to bring change and innovation in educational practices. There is a lack of knowledge about how teachers learn and transfer their knowledge into practice in the classrooms. Teacher educators have repeatedly argued that classroom management is a critical pedagogical skill that teachers must master in order to maximize classroom interaction. This study aims to contribute to the understanding of how lower secondary school teachers learn and improve classroom interaction in the context of an educational intervention. Three aspects of classroom interaction are addressed: emotional support, classroom organization and instructional support. The sample contained 81 teachers from 14 Norwegian lower secondary schools reporting, through digital logs, on learning experiences with respect to classroom interaction. Moreover, they reported on the types of learning activities they undertook. Findings indicated that teachers’ improvement in classroom interaction was, to a large extent, dependent on their own, or their colleagues’ strong knowledge of classroom interaction. The results of the study add to our understanding of teachers’ knowledge and skills within classroom interaction and how teachers can improve their knowledge, e.g., through reflection on situations in the classroom. Still, the authors suggest a stronger emphasis on the integration of research based knowledge and teacher learning strategies to support teachers to reach their full teaching potential.

Keywords

Classroom interaction Classroom management Classroom organization Emotional support Instructional support Learning activities Learning outcomes Learning process Teacher learning 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B., & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of effective teacher-student interactions in secondary school classrooms: Predicting student achievement with the classroom assessment scoring system—Secondary. School Psychology Review, 42, 76–98.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, P. H. (2005). Managing student behavior: How ready are teachers to meet the challenge? American Secondary Education, 33, 51–64.Google Scholar
  3. Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20, 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blase, K. A., Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D. L., & Bailey, F. W. (2012). Implementation science: Key concepts, themes, and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology. In B. Kelly & D. F. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 13–34). Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandsford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2005). Teacher–student relationships across the teaching career. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, D. L., Lauscher, H. N., Jarvis-Selinger, S., & Beckingham, B. (2004). Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 435–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carver, S. M., & Klahr, D. (2001). Cognition and Instruction: 25 years of progress. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Catts, H. W., Fey, M. E., Zhang, X., & Tomblin, J. B. (1999). Language basis of reading and reading disabilities: Evidence from a longitudinal investigation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, E. A., & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoagwood, K., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., et al. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1, 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emmer, E. T., & Sabornie, E. J. (2015). Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Emmer, E. T., & Stough, L. M. (2001). Classroom management: A critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26, 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eraut, M. (2007). Learning from other people in the workplace. Oxford Review of Education, 33, 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ertesvåg, S. K. (2011). Measuring authoritative teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Classroom management as field of inquiry. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 3–15). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the litterature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.Google Scholar
  20. Freiberg, H. J., Stein, T. A., & Huang, S. (1995). Effects of a classroom management intervention on a student achievement in inner-city elementary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 36–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fujiki, M., Brinton, B., & Clarke, D. (2002). Emotion regulation in children with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 33, 102–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gamlem, S. T. M., & Munthe, E. (2014). Mapping the quality of feedback to support student’s learning in lower secondary classrooms. Stavanger: Universitetet i Stavanger, Det humanistiske fakultet.Google Scholar
  23. Gibbs, G. (2002). Qualitative data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R. P., O’Brien, M. U., Zins, J. E., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hafen, C. A., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P., Bell, C. A., Gitomer, D. H., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system-secondary. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hande, H. S., Kamath, S. R., & D’Souza, J. (2014). Students’ perception of effective teaching practices in a Medical School. Education in Medicine Journal, 6, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henley, M. (2010). Classroom management: A proactive approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  29. Hunt, G. H., Touzel, T. J., & Wiseman, D. G. (2009). Effective teaching: Preparation and implementation. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. Justice, L. M., Meier, J., & Walpole, S. (2005). Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim, Y. H., Stormont, M., & Espinosa, L. (2009). Contributing factors to South Korean early childhood educators’ strategies for addressing children’s challenging behaviors. Journal of Early Intervention, 31, 227–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kretlow, A. G., Cooke, N. L., & Wood, C. L. (2012). Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers’ accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (2007). Effective classroom management and the development of subject-related interest. Learning and Instruction, 17, 494–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, R. (2006). Classroom discipline in Australia. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management Research, practice and contemporary issues (pp. 1193–1214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  35. Loizou, E. (2009). In-service early childhood teachers reflect on their teacher training program: Reconceptualizing the case of Cyprus. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 30, 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lorin, W. A. (2004). Increasing teacher effectiveness. Fundmentals of educational planning (2nd ed.). Paris: United Nations.Google Scholar
  37. Manning, M. L., & Bucher, K. T. (2003). Classroom management: Models, applications and cases. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools. ASCD: Translating research into practice.Google Scholar
  39. McTavish, D. G., & Pirro, E. B. (1990). Contextual content analysis. Quality & Quantity, 24, 245–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher-student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development, 74, 1145–1157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2007). A closer look at teachers’ individual learning in collaborative settings. Teachers and Teaching, 13, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Midthassel, U. V. (2006). Creating a shared understanding of classroom management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34, 365–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Midthassel, U. V., & Bru, E. (2001). Predictors and gains of teacher involvement in an improvement project on classroom management. Experiences from a Norwegian project in two compulsory schools. Educational Psychology, 21, 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministry of Education. (1996). Læreplanverket for den 10-årige grunnskulen [National curriculum for primary and lower secondary education]. Oslo.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Education. (2006). Læreplanverket for Kunnskapsløftet. [National curriculum for knowledge promotion in primary and secondary education and training]. Oslo.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of Education. (2011). Meld. St 22 (2010–2011) Motivasjon Mestring Muligheter: Ungdomstrinnet [Motivation, mastery, possibilities: Lower secondary school]. Oslo.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Education. (2016). St.meld. 28 (2015–2016) Fag-Fordyping-Froståelse. En fornyelse av Kunnskapsløftet [Subjects-depth–understanding: A renewal of the curriculum]. Oslo.Google Scholar
  49. Nahal, S. P. (2010). Voices from the field: Perspectives of first year teachers on the disconnect between teacher preparation programs and the realities of the classroom. Research in Higher Education, 8, 1–19.Google Scholar
  50. Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training. (2016). Ungdomstrinn i utvikling [Secondary school in development]. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. Retrieved from www.udir.no/kvalitet-og-kompetanse/nasjonale-satsinger/ungdomstrinn-i-utvikling/skolebasert-kompetanseutvikling-ungdomstrinnet/fullskala/#uh-sektoren-som-tilbydere.
  51. Omoteso, B. A., & Semudara, A. (2011). The relationship between teachers’ effectiveness and management of classroom misbehaviours in secondary schools. Psychology, 02, 902–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peters, J. M., & Armstrong, J. L. (1998). Collaborative learning: People laboring together to construct knowledge. New Directions for Adult Learning and Continuing Education, 79, 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pianta, R. C. (2006). Classroom management and relationships between children and teachers: Implications for research and practice. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 685–710). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  55. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009a). Classroom processes and positive youth development: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of interactions between teachers and students. New Directions for Youth Development, 2009, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pianta, R. C., & Hamre, B. K. (2009b). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Allen, J. P. (2012a). Teacher–student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., & Mintz, S. (2012b). Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS): Secondary manual. Charlottesville: Teachstone.Google Scholar
  59. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roland, P. (2012). Implementering av skole- utviklingsprogrammet Respekt. [Implementation of school-development program Respect] Stavanger: Senter for atferdsforskning, Doktorgradsprosjekt.Google Scholar
  63. Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P., & Dremock, F. (2005). Understanding mathematics and science matters. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  64. Shinn, M., & Yoshikawa, H. (2008). Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Skibbe, L., Behnke, M., & Justice, L. M. (2004). Parental scaffolding of children’s phonological awareness skills: Interactions between mothers and their preschoolers with language diffi culties. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25, 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sokal, L., Smith, D. G., & Mowat, H. (2003). Alternative certification teachers’ attitudes toward classroom management. The High School Journal, 86, 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stough, L., Montague, M., Williams-Diehm, K., & Landmark, L. (2006). The effectiveness of different models of classromm management instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April.Google Scholar
  68. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., & Grant, L. W. (2011). What makes good teachers good? A cross-case analysis of the connection between teacher effectiveness and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stronge, J. H., Ward, T. J., Tucker, P. D., & Hindman, J. L. (2007). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Teddlie, C., Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, D., & Yu, F. (2006). The international system for teacher observation and feedback: Evolution of an international study of teacher effectiveness constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. Bristol, PA: Falmer.Google Scholar
  73. Tseng, V., & Seidman, E. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. United States Department of Education Office of Planning Evaluation and Policy Development. (2010, March). ESEA a blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/blueprint.pdf.
  75. van Tartwijk, J., den Brok, P., Veldman, I., & Wubbels, T. (2009). Teachers’ practical knowledge about classroom management in multicultural classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vermetten, Y. J., Vermunt, J. D., & Lodewijks, H. G. (2002). Powerful learning environments? How university students differ in their response to instructional measures. Learning and Instruction, 12, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education, 31, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vermunt, J. D. (2011). Patterns in student learning and teacher learning. Similarities and differences. In S. Rayner & E. Cool (Eds.), Style difference in cognition. Learning and management (pp. 173–187). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Vermunt, J. D. (2014). Teacher learning and professional development. In S. Krolak-Schwerdt, S. Glock, & M. Böhmer (Eds.), Teachers’ professional development (pp. 79–95). Rotterdam: SensePublishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vermunt, J. D., & Endedijk, M. D. (2011). Patterns in teacher learning in different phases of the professional career. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 294–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Genesis of the higher mental functions. In P. Light, S. Sheldon, & M. Woodhead (Eds.), Learning to think (pp. 32–41). Florence, KY: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. Weinstein, C. S., Tomlinson-Clarke, S., & Curran, M. (2004). Toward a conception of culturally responsive classroom management. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Westergård, E., Ertesvåg, S. K., & Rafaelsen, F. (2018). Preliminary validity of the classroom assessment scoring system in Norwegian lower secondary schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researach. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1415964
  85. Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., & van Tartwijk, J. (2015). Teacher-student realtionships and classroom management. In E. T. Emmer & E. J. Sabornie (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management (2nd ed., pp. 363–386). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  86. Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2007). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 17, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian Centre for Learning Environment and Behavioural Research in EducationStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options