Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 295–309 | Cite as

School leaders’ dilemmas and measures to instigate changes for inclusive education in Hong Kong

  • Kim Fong Poon-McBrayer
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The roles of principal leadership in change management have long been documented. The key concern to examine in this study was the dilemmas and measures confronting principals’ when they led changes to instigate inclusive education in Hong Kong. Thus, this paper aims to report sources of dilemmas and how principals tackled them in the change process. Ten principals of schools recognized for effective inclusive education practices were interviewed in a qualitative study. Findings suggested that the process of leading change was very complex. Two dilemmas were identified: (a) principals’ struggles between benefits and issues of participating in inclusive education and (b) autocratic initial decisions versus need for staff involvement. The second dilemma stemmed from not involving key staff while the implementation required their active participation. Thus, the existing organizational culture and personnel capacities became obstacles required for the success of inclusive education. The leadership measures to tackle the obstacles began by building a shared vision which in turn required both transactional and transformational leadership activities in order to increase teacher commitment to reforms. This study has contributed to change leadership theories in affirming the need to include socio-political contexts in examining leadership decisions toward school reforms.

Keywords

Principal leadership Transactional leadership Transformational leadership Inclusive education Hong Kong 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee (Grant No. 840013).

References

  1. Ainscow, M. (2005). Developing inclusive education systems: What are the levers for change? Journal of Educational Change, 6(2), 109–124. doi: 10.1007/s10833-005-1298-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M. (2012). Moving knowledge around: Strategies for fostering equity within educational systems. Journal of Educational Change, 13(3), 289–310. doi: 10.1007/s10833-012-9182-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2016). Using collaborative inquiry to foster equity within school systems: Opportunities and barriers. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avolio, B., & Bass, B. (Eds.). (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  6. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. doi: 10.1080/08856250210129056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Basit, T. N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Education Research, 45(2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennis, W. G. (2007). The challenges of leadership in the modern world. American Psychologist, 62(1), 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cherian, F., & Daniel, Y. (2008). Principal leadership in new teacher induction: Becoming agents of change. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(2), 1–11.Google Scholar
  10. Darensbourg, K. H. (2011, January 1). The role of special education administrators in addressing contextual factors when implementing comprehensive school reform in response to the mandate of the no child left behind act of 2001 (P.L. 107–110). ProQuest LLC, 2011. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1172359048?accountid=11441.
  11. Day, S. (2012). A reflexive lens: Exploring dilemmas of qualitative methodology through the concept of reflexivity. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(1), 61–73. Retrieved from http://www.qualitativesociologyreview.org/ENG/Volume21/QSR_8_1_Day.pdf.
  12. DeMatthews, D., & Mawhinney, H. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to address inequities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 844–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Education Bureau. (2011). School partnership scheme in supporting students with special educational needs for the 2011/12 and 2012/13 school years. Retrieved from http://applications.edb.gov.hk/circular/upload/EDBCM/EDBCM11142e.pdf.
  15. Ehrich, L. C., Harris, J., Klenowski, V., Smeed, J., & Ainscow, M. (2015). Ethical leadership in a time of increasing accountability. Leading and Managing, 21(1), 22–35.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, A. A. (2004). Beyond mediocrity: Transformational leadership within a transactional framework. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 7(3), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2012). Who makes a good leader? Cooperativeness, optimism, and leading-by-example. Economic Inquiry, 50(4), 953–965. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-7295.2010.00295.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerstl-Pepin, C., & Aiken, J. A. (2009). Democratic school leaders: Defining ethical leadership in a standardized context. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 406–444.Google Scholar
  20. Goldfarb, K. P., & Grinberg, J. (2002). Leadership for social justice: Authentic participation in the case of a community center in Caracas, Venezuela. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 157–173.Google Scholar
  21. Grissom, J., & Loeb, S. (2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections of the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge journal of education, 33(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, A. (2005). Leading from the chalk-face: An overview of school leadership. Leadership, 1(1), 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hentrich, S., Zimber, A., Garbade, S. F., Gregersen, S., Nienhaus, A., & Petermann, F. (2017). Relationships between transformational leadership and health: The mediating role of perceived job demands and occupational self-efficacy. International Journal of Stress Management, 24(1), 34–61. doi: 10.1037/str0000027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hong Kong Government. (2011). Religion and custom. Retrieved from http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/religion.pdf.
  26. Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics. (2013). The fertility trend in Hong Kong, 1981 to 2012. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.hk/pub/B71312FA2013XXXXB0100.pdf.
  27. Jones, P., Forlin, C., & Gillies, A. (2013). The contribution of facilitated leadership to systems development for greater inclusive practices. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 9(1), 60–74.Google Scholar
  28. Kathleen, L. (2012). A research study of transformational leadership comparing leadership styles of the principal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  29. Kershner, B., & McQuillan, P. (2016). Complex adaptive schools: Educational leadership and school change. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 13(1), 4–29.Google Scholar
  30. Klar, H. W. (2012). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(4), 365–390. doi: 10.1080/15700763.2012.654886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  32. Kugelmass, J., & Ainscow, M. (2004). Leadership for inclusion: A comparison of international practices. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4(3), 133–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2004.00028.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 451–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Masumoto, M., & Brown-Welty, S. (2009). Case study of leadership practices and school community interrelationships in high-performing, high-poverty, rural California high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  35. McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. L. (2015). Effective leadership makes schools truly inclusive. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(5), 68–73. doi: 10.1177/0031721715569474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Mette, I. M., & Scribner, J. P. (2014). Turnaround, transformational, or transactional leadership: An ethical dilemma in school reform. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 17(4), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moolenaar, N., Daly, A., & Sleegers, P. (2010). Occupying the principal position: Examining relationships between transformational leadership, social network position, and schools’ innovative climate. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 623–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Navickaite, J. (2013). The expression of a principal’s transformational leadership during the organizational change process: A case study of Lithuanian general education schools. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 2013(51), 70–82.Google Scholar
  41. Pan, X., & Qin, Q. (2007). An analysis of the relation between secondary school organizational contexts and teacher job satisfaction. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 65–77. doi: 10.2753/CED1061-1932400507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Pepper, K. (2010). Effective principals skillfully balance leadership styles to facilitate student success: A focus for the reauthorization of ESEA. Planning and Changing, 41(1/2), 42–56.Google Scholar
  44. Poon-McBrayer, K. F. (1999a). Practitioners' views on integrating students with disabilities. Hong Kong Special Education Forum, 2(1), 69–78.Google Scholar
  45. Poon-McBrayer, K. F. (1999b). Preparing Hong Kong schools to establish school-based problem solving teams: A pre-pilot investigation. The Journal of International Special Needs Education, 2, 7–14. Google Scholar
  46. Poon-McBrayer, K. F., & Wong, P. M. (2013). Inclusive education services for children and youth with disabilities: Values, roles and challenges of school leaders. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1520–1525. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.06.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Printy, S. M., Marks, H. M., & Bowers, A. J. (2009). Integrated leadership: How principals and teachers share transformational and instructional influence. Journal of School Leadership, 19(5), 504–532.Google Scholar
  48. Punch, K. F. (2009). Introduction to research methods in education. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Rich, G. A. (1997). The sales manager as a role model: Effects on trust, job satisfaction, and performance of sales people. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(4), 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (Eds.). (2002). Management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  51. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rude, H. A., Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. E., & Comerford, S. (2005). Ethical leadership: Supporting human rights and diversity in rural communities. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 24(4), 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sen, A. (2007). Leadership with a shared vision in the 21st century: Lessons from Ataturk. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 2, 13–30. Retrieved from http://isma.info/uploads/files/013-leadership-with-a-shared–vision-in-the-2ist-centurylessons-from-ataturk.pdf.
  54. Sergiovanni, T. (Ed.). (2007). Rethinking leadership: A collection of articles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  55. Silins, H. C. (1994). The relationship between transformational and transactional leadership and school improvement outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 272–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Slater, C. L. (2012). Understanding principal leadership: An international perspective and a narrative approach. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 39(2), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7(17). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=17.
  58. Stuckey, H. L. (2015). The second step in data analysis: Coding qualitative research data. Journal of Social Health Diabetes, 3, 7–10. doi: 10.4103/2321-0656.140875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Theoharis, G. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Theoharis, G., & Causton, J. (2014). Leading inclusive reform for students with disabilities: A school- and system wide approach. Theory into Practice, 53(2), 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (2009). Towards inclusive education for children with disabilities: A guideline. Retrieved April 30, from UNESCO Web site: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/disabchild09-en.pdf.
  62. Urick, A. (2016). Examining US principal perception of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 152–172. doi: 10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Urick, A., & Bowers, A. J. (2014). What are the different types of principals across the United States? A latent class analysis of principal perception of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 96–134. doi: 10.1177/0013161x13489019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wong, P. M. (2011). The village school context and principalship in Hong Kong: What do they contribute to leadership studies? School Leadership and Management, 31(5), 517–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yong, C. (2017, February). Singapore’s total fertility rate dipped to 1.20 in 2016. The Straitstimes. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/singapores-total-fertility-rate-dipped-to-120-in-2016.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education Policy and LeadershipThe Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options