Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 437–451 | Cite as

System-wide improvement at the instructional core: Changing reading teaching in South Africa

  • Brahm Fleisch
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The article describes the background to, and implementation of, the Gauteng Primary Language and Mathematics Strategy (GPLMS) in South Africa from 2010 to 2014—an initiative aimed at system-wide instructional improvement in the Global South. Working in over 1000 underperforming primary schools in poor- and working-class communities, the government-led GPLMS combined scripted lesson plans, provision of quality learner materials and personalised instructional coaching to enable teachers to adopt more effective instructional practices.

Keywords

System-wide instructional reform Literacy Mathematics Early grades 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ball, D., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is—Or might be—The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform? Educational Researchers, 25, 6–14.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, A. V., Cole, S., Duflo, E., & Linden, L. (2007). Remedying education: Evidence from two randomized experiments in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1235–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barber, M. (2008). Instruction to deliver. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  4. Beatty, B. (2011). The dilemma of scripted instruction: Comparing teacher autonomy, fidelity, and resistance in the Froebelian kindergarten, Montessori, direct instruction, and success for all. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 395–430.Google Scholar
  5. Bizos, E. N. (2009). Authoring lives: A case study of how grade 6 children in a South African township construct themselves as readers and writers. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  6. Botha, D. (2007). Early childhood literacy and emergent bilingualism: Vocabulary teaching and learning in one Soweto classroom. Honours thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  7. Carnoy, M., Chisholm, L., & Chilisa, B. (2015). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. HSRC Press.Google Scholar
  8. Chisholm, L. (2003). The state of curriculum reform in South Africa: The issue of Curriculum 2005. State of the nation. South Africa, 2004, 268–289.Google Scholar
  9. Christie, P. (1998). Schools as (dis)organisations: The ‘breakdown of the culture of learning and teaching’ in South African schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. City, E. A., Elmore, R. A., Fiarman, S., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, D. K. (2011). Teaching and its predicaments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 119–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, D. K., & Spillane, J. (1993). Policy and practice: The relations between governance and isntruction. In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  14. De Clercq, F. (1997). Policy intervention and power shifts: An evaluation of South Africa’s education restructuring policies. Journal of Education Policy, 12(3), 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Clercq, F. (2014). Improving teachers’ practice in poorly performing primary schools: The trial of the GPLMS intervention in Gauteng. Education as Change, 18(2), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Clercq, F., & Shalem, Y. (2014). Teacher knowledge and employer-driven professional development: a critical analysis of the Gauteng Department of Education programmes. Southern African Review of Education with Education, 20, 129–147.Google Scholar
  17. Department of Basic Education. (2012). Report on the annual national assessment of 2012. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.Google Scholar
  18. Department of Basic Education. (2013). Report on the annual national assessment of 2013. Pretoria: Department of Basic EducationGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixon, K. (2010). Literacy, power and the schooled body: Learning in time and space. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Earl, L., Fullan, M., Leithwood, K., & Watson, N. (2000). OISE/UT evaluation of the implementation of the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies. Summary: First annual report. Watching & learning. Annesley, UK: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  21. Elmore, R. (2010). Institutions, improvement and practice. In A. Hargreaves & M. Fullan (Eds.), Change wars. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.Google Scholar
  22. Elmore, R. F., & Burney, D. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City. New York: National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  23. Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F. (2004). Elusive equity: Education reform in post-apartheid South Africa. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fleisch, B. (2002). Managing educational change: The state and school reform in South Africa. Johannesburg: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. Fleisch, B. (2008). Primary education in crisis: Why South African schoolchildren underachieve in reading and mathematics. Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar
  26. Fleisch, B., & Schöer, V. (2014). Large-scale instructional reform in the Global South: Insights from the mid-point evaluation of the Gauteng Primary Language and Mathematics Strategy. South African Journal of Education, 34(3), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fleisch, B., Schöer, V., Roberts, G., & Thornton, A. (2016). System-wide improvement of early-grade mathematics: New evidence from the Gauteng Primary Language and Mathematics Strategy. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fleisch, B., Taylor, S., Schöer, V., & Mabogoane, T. (2015). A report of the findings of the impact evaluation of the Reading Catch-Up Programme. Manuscript with author.Google Scholar
  29. Friedman, W., Gerard, F., & Ralaingita, W. (2010). International independent evaluation of the effectiveness of Institut pour l’Education Populaire’s ‘Read-Learn-Lead’ (RLL) program in Mali. Mid-term report. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
  30. Fullan, M. (2010). Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fullan, M., & Boyle, A. (2014). Big-city school reforms: Lessons from New York, Toronto and London. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gains, P. (2010). Learning about literacy: Teachers’ conceptualisations and enactments of early literacy pedagogy in South African Grade One classrooms. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  33. Gallucci, C., Van Lare, M. D., Yoon, I. H., & Boatright, B. (2010). Instructional coaching building theory about the role and organizational support for professional learning. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 919–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ganasi, R. (2010). The reading experiences of Grade Four children. MEd research report, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  35. Glewwe, P. (2002). Schools and skills in developing countries: Education policies and socioeconomic outcomes. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 436–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  37. He, F., Linden, L., & MacLeod, M. (2008). How to teach English in India: Testing the relative productivity of instruction methods within the Pratham English language education program. New York: Columbia University. Mimeographed document.Google Scholar
  38. Howie, S., Venter, E., & Van Staden, S. (2008). The effect of multilingual policies on performance and progression in reading literacy in South African primary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6), 551–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Janks, H. (2014). Globalisation, diversity, and education: A South African perspective. The Educational Forum, 78(1), 8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jansen, J. D. (1998). Curriculum reform in South Africa: A critical analysis of outcomes-based education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(3), 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jansen, J. D. (2002). Political symbolism as policy craft: Explaining non-reform in South African education after apartheid. Journal of Education Policy, 17(2), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jansen, J., & Taylor, N. (2003). Educational change in South Africa 1994–2003: Case studies in large-scale education reform. (http://jet.org.za/publications/research/Jansen%20and%20Taylor_World%20Bank%20report.pdf)
  43. Katz, J. (2014). Vula Bula: Basal Readers in African Languages. In Paper Presented at the South African Education Research Association Meeting. Durban.Google Scholar
  44. Koornhoff, H. (2011). From conception to consumption: An examination of the intellectual process of producing textbooks for the Foundation Phase in South Africa. MEd, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  45. Kruizinga, A. (2010). An evaluation of guided reading in three primary schools in the Western Cape. MA thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  46. Lucas, A. M., McEwan, P. J., Ngware, M., & Oketch, M. (2013). Improving early-grade literacy in East Africa: Experimental evidence from Kenya and Uganda (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  47. Macdonald, C. (2002). Are children still swimming up the waterfall? A look at literacy development in the new curriculum. Language Matters, 33(1), 111–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Macdonald, C. (2006). The properties of mediated action in three different literacy contexts in South Africa. Theory and Psychology, 16(1), 51–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mackie, J. M. (2007). Beyond learning to read: An evaluation of a short reading intervention in the Ilembe District of KwaZulu-Natal. MEd research report, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  50. Malone, H. J. (Ed.). (2013). Leading educational change: Global issues, challenges, and lessons on whole-system reform. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  51. Maphumulo, T. (2010). An exploration of how Grade 1 isiZulu teachers teach reading. MEd thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  52. Masterson, L. (2013). A case study of Foundation Phase teachers’ experiences of literacy coaching in the GPLMS programme. Doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  53. Maswanganye, B. (2010). The teaching of First Additional Language reading in Grade 4 in selected schools in the Moretele Area Project Office. MEd thesis, University of South Africa, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  54. McEwan, P. J. (2013). Improving learning in primary schools of developing countries: A meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Unpublished manuscript, Wellesley College, Wellesley, MA.Google Scholar
  55. Molotsi, G. (2015). An exploration of teachers’ view and experiences toward the use of Gauteng Primary Literacy and Mathematics Strategy (GPLMS) Lesson Plans with and without coaches. Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
  56. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. New York: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  57. National Education Evaluation and Development Unit (NEEDU). (2014). National Report 2013: Teaching and learning in rural primary schools. Pretoria: NEEDU.Google Scholar
  58. O’Day, J. A., Bitter, C. S., & Gomez, L. M. (2011). Education reform in New York City: Ambitious change in the nation’s most complex school system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  59. Piper, B., & Korda, M., (2011). EGRA Plus: Liberia. Program Evaluation Report. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International.Google Scholar
  60. Piper, B., Zuilkowski, S. S., & Mugenda, A. (2014). Improving reading outcomes in Kenya: First-year effects of the PRIMR Initiative. International Journal of Educational Development, 37, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Place, J. (2005). The college book sack project in the Kwena Basin farm schools of Mpumalanga: A case study. PhD thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  62. Pretorius, E., & Currin, S. (2010). Do the rich get richer and the poor poorer? The effects of an intervention programme on reading in the home and school language in a high poverty multilingual context. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pretorius, E., & Mokhwesana, M. (2009). Putting reading in Northern Sotho on track in the early years: Changing resources, expectations, and practices in a high poverty school. South African Journal of African Languages, 1, 54–73.Google Scholar
  64. Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). Advancing educational policy by advancing research on instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 206–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reddy, V., & Prinsloo, C. H. (2015). The meaning and utility of TIMSS data for systemic and school change: highlights from TIMSS 2011: South Africa.Google Scholar
  66. Reeves, C., Heugh, K., Prinsloo, C. H., Macdonald, C., Netshitangani, T., Alidou, H., et al. (2008). Evaluation of literacy teaching in primary schools in Limpopo. Polokwane: Limpopo Department of Education.Google Scholar
  67. Sarason, S. B. (1966). The school culture and processes of change. College of Education, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  68. Sayed, Y., Alhawsawi, S., Mwale, S., & Van Niekerk, R. (2013). The state and education policy change in South Africa: Walking the tightrope between choice and equity. In D. Turner & H. Yolcu (Eds.), Neo-liberal educational reforms: A critical analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Shindler, J., & Fleisch, B. (2007). Schooling for all in South Africa: Closing the gap. International Review of Education, 53(2), 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Snilstveit, B, Stevenson, J, Phillips, D, Vojtkova, M, Gallagher, E, Schmidt, T, Jobse, H, Geelen, M, Pastorello, M, & Eyers, J. (2015). Interventions for improving learning outcomes and access to education in low—And middle—Income countries: A systematic review, 3ie Final Review. London: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)Google Scholar
  71. Spaull, N. (2011). A preliminary analysis of SACMEQ III South Africa S.E.W.P. 11/11. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
  72. Taylor, S. (2015). Early grade reading study: Baseline data collection and year 1 activities. Manuscript with author.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, N., Van der Berg, S., & Mabogoane, T. (2013). Creating effective schools. Cape Town: Pearson.Google Scholar
  74. Tucker, M. S. (2011). Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options