Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 29–49 | Cite as

Intensification and isolation: Alienated teaching and collaborative professional relationships in the accountability context

  • Corrie Stone-Johnson
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The global educational landscape continues to change in response to three forces: a new paradigm of curriculum approaches that has shifted from teaching to learning; public demand for evidence of this learning; and decentralization of public schools (Sahlberg in Journal of Educational Change, 12(2):173–185, 2011). These changes have had what many researchers identify as a negative effect on the work of teachers (Cochran-Smith and Lytle in Harvard Educational Review, 76(4):668–697, 2006; Griffin and Scharmann in Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3):35–48, 2008; Hargreaves and Shirley in Phi Delta Kappan, 90(2):135–143, 2008; Hill in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2):95–114, 2007; Jennings and Rentner in Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2):110–113, 2006; McNeil in Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. Routledge, New York, 2000). One effect is alienation, which may take many forms including disengagement from work, isolation and neglect (Brooks et al. in Educ Policy 22(1):45–62, 2008; Macdonald and Shirley in The mindful teacher. Teachers College Press, New York, 2009; Zielinski and Hoy in Educ Adm Q 19(2):27–45, 1983). In this article, I use data gathered from interviews with teachers and school counselors in a suburban district outside a Rust Belt city to demonstrate that the reach of alienated teaching in the accountability context extends beyond teachers’ own work to impact the entire school community. In particular, I show that alienated teaching further isolates school counselors and teachers, whose work has long been organizationally separate, from collaborative professional relationships and ultimately prevents students from receiving the types of support services they need for postsecondary success.

Keywords

Alienation Change Counselor Intensification Isolation Teacher 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American School Counselor Association (2005). The ASCA National Model: A framework for school counseling programs (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCA.Google Scholar
  2. American School Counselor Association (2014). Student-to-school-counselor-ratio 2010–2011 [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.schoolcounselor.org/asca/media/asca/home/ratios10-11.pdf
  3. Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd, M. P. (2012). Planning and realigning a lesson plan in response to student contributions. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, J. S., Hughes, R. M., & Brooks, M. C. (2008). Fear and trembling in the American high school: Educational reform and teacher isolation. Educational Policy, 22(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Cicourel, A. V., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1963). The educational decision-makers. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  9. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2006). Troubling images of teaching in no child left behind. Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 668–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Day, C., & Smethem, L. (2009). The effects of reform: Have teachers really lost their sense of professionalism? Journal of Educational Change, 10(2/3), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Edmond, N., & Price, M. (2009). Workforce re-modelling and pastoral care in schools: A diversification of roles or a de-professionalisation of functions? Pastoral Care in Education, 27(4), 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitch, T., Newby, E., Ballestero, V., & Marshall, J. L. (2001). Future school administrators’ perceptions of the school counselor’s role. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41(2), 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freelon, R., Bertand, M., & Rogers, J. (2012). Overburdened and underfunded: California public schools amidst the Great Recession. Multidisciplinary Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 152–176. doi: 10.4471/remie.2012.08.Google Scholar
  15. Fromm, E. (1955). The sane society. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  16. Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103(4), 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin, G., & Scharmann, L. (2008). Initial impacts of No Child Left Behind on elementary science education. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(3), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2008). Beyond standardisation: Powerful new principles for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(2), 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  21. Hill, H. C. (2007). Mathematical knowledge of middle school teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind policy initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Janson, C., Militello, M., & Kosine, N. (2008). Four views of the professional school counselor–principal relationship: A Q-methodology study. Professional School Counseling, 11(6), 353–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jennings, J., & Rentner, D. S. (2006). Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 110–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, J., & Rochkind, J. (2010). Can I get a little advice here? (Report for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation). New York: Public Agenda.Google Scholar
  25. Lairio, M., & Nissilä, P. (2002). Towards networking in counselling: A follow-up study of Finnish school counselling. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 30(2), 159–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lambie, G. W., & Williamson, L. L. (2004). The challenge to change from guidance counseling to professional school counseling: A historical proposition. Professional School Counseling, 8(2), 124–131.Google Scholar
  27. Lee, J., & Mishook, J. (2012). The role of counseling in an era of college readiness. Retrieved from http://annenberginstitute.org/commentary/2012/03/role-counseling-era-college-readiness
  28. MacDonald, E., & Shirley, D. (2009). The mindful teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society in an age of reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  30. Marx, K. (1844/1988). Economic and philosophic manuscripts of 1944. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  31. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  33. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  34. Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  35. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Pugh, K. J., & Zhao, Y. (2003). Stories of teacher alienation: A look at the unintended consequences of efforts to empower teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(2), 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Scarborough, J. L., & Culbreth, J. R. (2008). Examining discrepancies between actual and preferred practice of school counselors. Journal of Counseling and Development, 86(4), 446–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Seeman, M. (1959). On the meaning of alienation. American Sociological Review, 24(6), 783–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shepard, J. H. (1973). Technology, division of labor and alienation. Pacific Sociological Review, 16(1), 61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shimoni, A., & Greenberger, L. (2014). School counselors deliver information about school counseling and their work: What professional message is conveyed? Professional School Counseling, 18(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shoffner, M. F., & Williamson, R. D. (2000). Engaging preservice school counselors and principals in dialogue and collaboration. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40(2), 128–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stone-Johnson, C. (2014). Responsible leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 645–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stone-Johnson, C. (2015). Counselors as policy actors: Challenges to systemic involvement in college and career readiness policy in secondary schools. American Secondary Education, 43(2), 27–43.Google Scholar
  45. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Sutton Jr, J. M., & Fall, M. (1995). The relationship of school climate factors to counselor self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling and Development: JCD, 73(3), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Texas Education Agency. (2014). School and guidance counseling—FAQ. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/Guidance_Counseling_FAQ.html#q4
  48. Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weis, L., Nozaki, Y., Granfield, R., & Olsen, N. (2007). A call for civically engaged educational policy-related scholarship. Educational Policy, 21(2), 426–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wills, J. S., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065–1114.Google Scholar
  51. Yeo, L. S., Tan, S. Y., & Neihart, M. F. (2012). Counseling in Singapore. Journal of Counseling & Development, 90(2), 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Zalaquett, C. P. (2005). Principals' perceptions of elementary school counselors' role and functions. Professional School Counseling, 8(5), 451–457.Google Scholar
  54. Zielinski, A. E., & Hoy, W. K. (1983). Isolation and alienation in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(2), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options