Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 145–169 | Cite as

Second chance or no chance? A case study of one urban alternative middle school

  • Brianna L. Kennedy-Lewis
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This qualitative case study focuses on a school created to educate expelled students, specifically examining the relationships between educators’ beliefs and philosophies and daily school life. At this school, Kelly’s (Last chance high. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1993) competing philosophies of traditionalism and developmentalism got enacted at the school and classroom levels in ways that precluded effective practice. These competing philosophies reflect broader national and international discourses that simultaneously promote neoliberal marketization and democratic emancipation. Conflicting sub-cultures at the school under study emerged as the most salient conduit at the school level for the enactment of these competing philosophies, and administrators’ practices at the school and district levels unintentionally reinforced these conflicting sub-cultures. Findings suggest that improving the educational experiences of persistently disciplined students requires the clarification of philosophical underpinnings and cohesion of policy mandates and implementation at federal, state, and local levels. Without such clarification, alternative schools may serve more to push students further out of school and into the school-to-prison pipeline than to reengage them.

Keywords

Zero tolerance School discipline Alternative schools School-to-prison pipeline Neoliberalism 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63(9), 852–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aron, L. Y. (2006). An overview of alternative education. Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation track in high-poverty middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barr, R. D., & Parrett, W. H. (2001). Hope fulfilled for at-risk and violent youth: K-12 programs that work (2nd ed.). Boston: Allen and Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Benavot, A., Cha, Y., Kamens, D., Meyer, J. W., & Wong, S. (1991). Knowledge for the masses: World models and national curricula, 1920–1986. American Sociological Review, 56(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borum, R., Cornell, D. G., Modzeleski, W., & Jimerson, S. R. (2010). What can be done about school shootings? A review of the evidence. Educational Researcher, 39(1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, P., & Tannock, S. (2009). Education, meritocracy and the global war for talent. Journal of Education Policy, 24(4), 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carver, P. R., Lewis, L., & Tice, P. (2010). Alternative schools and programs for public school students at risk of educational failure: 2007–2008 (NCES 2010-026). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  11. Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(3), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fabelo, T., Thompson, M. D., Plotkin, M., Carmichael, D., Marchbanks, M. P., & Booth, E. A. (2011). Breaking schools’ rules. New York: Justice Center.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, C., & Harding, D. J. (2005). School shootings as organizational deviance. Sociology of Education, 78(1), 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giroux, H. A. (2008). Against the terror of neoliberalism. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Giroux, H. A., & Schmidt, M. (2004). Closing the achievement gap: A metaphor for children left behind. Journal of Educational Change, 5(3), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Granite, E., & Graham, L. J. (2012). Remove, rehabilitate, return? The use and effectiveness of behaviour schools in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal on School Disaffection, 9(1), 39–50.Google Scholar
  18. Gutherson, P., Davies, H., & Daszkiewicz, T. (2011). Achieving successful outcomes through Alternative Education Provision: An international literature review. Reading: CfBT Education Trust.Google Scholar
  19. Harber, C. (2008). Perpetrating disaffection: Schooling as an international problem. Educational Studies, 34(5), 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A. (2010). Change from without: Lessons from other countries, systems, and sectors. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 105–117). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and non-sustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirschfield, P. J. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hursh, D. (2005). Neoliberalism, markets, and accountability: Transforming education and undermining democracy in the United States and England. Policy Futures in Education, 3(1), 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. International Centre for Prison Studies. (2014). Highest to lowest—Prison population total. Retrieved from http://www.prisonstudies.org/highest-to-lowest/prison-population-total?field_region_taxonomy_tid=All
  26. Irby, D. J. (2014). Trouble at school: Understanding school discipline systems as nets of social control. Equity and Excellence in Education, 47(4), 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kelly, D. M. (1993). Last chance high. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kennedy-Lewis, B. L. (2012). What happens after students are expelled? Understanding teachers’ successes and failures at one alternative middle school. Teachers College Record, 114(12), 1–38.Google Scholar
  29. Kennedy-Lewis, B. L. (2014). Using critical policy analysis to examine competing discourses in zero tolerance legislation: Do we really want to leave no child behind? Journal of Education Policy, 29(2). 165–194.Google Scholar
  30. Kim, C. Y., Losen, D. J., & Hewitt, D. T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline: Structuring legal reform. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kim, J., & Taylor, K. (2008). Rethinking alternative education to break the cycle of educational inequality and inequity. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin, B. (2008). How to change 5000 schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  33. Levin, B., Datnow, A., & Carrier, N. (2012). Changing school district practices. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.Google Scholar
  34. Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Lipsey, M. W., Howell, J. C., Kelly, M. R., Chapman, G., & Carver, D. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of juvenile justice programs. Washington, DC: Georgetown Center for Juvenile Justice Reform.Google Scholar
  36. Losen, D. J., & Skiba, R. (2010). Suspended education: Urban middle schools in crisis. Retrieved from Southern Poverty Law Center website: http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/publications/suspended-education
  37. McNeal, L., & Dunbar, C. (2010). In the eyes of the beholder: Urban student perceptions of zero tolerance policy. Urban Education, 45(3), 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mendez, L. R., & Knoff, H. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(1), 30–52.Google Scholar
  39. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Munn, P., Lloyd, G., & Cullen, M. (2000). Alternatives to exclusions from school. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Nolan, K. (2011). Police in the hallways: Discipline in an urban high school. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  43. Orfield, G., Losen, D., Wald, J., & Swanson, C. (2004). Losing our future: How minority youth are being left behind by the graduation rate crisis. Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project at Harvard University. Contributors: Advocates for Children of New York, The Civil Society Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Raywid, M. A. (1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52(1), 26–31.Google Scholar
  45. Rios, V. (2011). Punished: Policing the lives of Black and Latino boys. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rocque, M. (2010). Office discipline and student behavior: Does race matter? American Journal of Education, 116(4), 557–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saltman, K. J. (2006). The right-wing attack on critical and public education in the United States. Cultural Politics, 2(3), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Skerrett, A., & Hargreaves, A. (2008). Student diversity and secondary school change in a context of increasingly standardized reform. American Educational Research Association, 45(4), 913–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Skiba, R. J., & Knesting, K. (2011). Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 2001(92), 17–43.Google Scholar
  50. Skiba, R. J., Peterson, R. L., & Williams, T. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, R. L. (2003). School disaffection—Africa’s growing problem? The International Journal on School Disaffection, 1(1), 7–12.Google Scholar
  52. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Suárez-Orozco, M. M., & Qin-Hilliard, D. B. (2004). Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium. In M. M. Suárez-Orozco & D. B. Qin-Hilliard (Eds.), Globalization: Culture and education in the new millennium (pp. 1–29). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  55. United States Department of Education. (2004). Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  56. Vanderhaar, J. E., Petrosko, J. M., & Muñoz, M. A. (2013). Reconsidering the alternatives: The relationship between suspension, disciplinary alternative school placement, subsequent juvenile detention, and the salience of race. In Paper presented at the national conference on race and gender disparities in discipline, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  57. Wehlage, G. G., Rutter, R. A., Smith, G. A., Lesko, N., & Fernandez, R. R. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  58. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teaching and LearningUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options