Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 377–409 | Cite as

Developing the potential for sustainable improvement in underperforming schools: Capacity building in the socio-cultural dimension

  • Jeffrey V. Bennett
  • Rose M. Ylimaki
  • Thad M. Dugan
  • Lynnette A. Brunderman
Article

Abstract

This mixed-method study examines Arizona principals’ capacity-building skills and practices in Tier III schools aimed at developing potential for sustained improvements in student outcomes. Data sources included surveys (62 individuals) and semistructured interviews (29 individuals) of principals and staff (e.g. teachers, instructional coaches, assistant principals) who participated in grant-funded leadership training over an 18-month period. The theoretical framework consisted of leadership in the sociocultural dimension (Ylimaki et al. in Leadersh Policy Sch 11(2):168–193, 2012) and capacity building for sustainable improvement in high-capacity Schools (Mitchell and Sackney in Sustainable improvement: building learning communities that endure. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2009). Findings indicated that: (1) schools were not at high-levels of capacity building; (2) those schools in process of building capacity for sustainable improvement demonstrate a directive leadership approach; (3) school development towards high capacity focused on micro-level processes (e.g., professional learning communities); and (4) little attention was given to leadership in the socio-cultural dimension. Implications of the study suggest future research test a leadership development model for Tier III schools that links capacity building leadership and student achievement. The next generation of educational leaders must also have the knowledge, skills, dispositions, and analytical tools to lead schools in both the accountability culture and the macro socio-cultural dimension.

Keywords

Capacity building School improvement Learning communities Collaboration Sociocultural context 

References

  1. Apple, M. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York, NY: TC Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. (2000). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Apple, M. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Arizona Department of Education. (2010). Corrective action and restructuring support planning process. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/wp-content/uploads/PDF/CA-RPFallProcessFINAL82310.pdf.
  5. Arizona Department of Education. (2012a). Assessment: Overview. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/standards-development-assessment/.
  6. Arizona Department of Education. (2012b). Research and evaluation: October 1st enrollment figures. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/research-evaluation/arizona-enrollment-figures/.
  7. Arizona Department of Education. (2012c). School improvement: Overview. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/improvement-intervention/.
  8. Arizona Department of Education. (2012d). State of Arizona Department of Education 20112012 state report card. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/research-evaluation/files/2011/07/2012statereportcard.pdf.
  9. Arizona Department of Education. (2012e). Research and evaluation: A–F accountability. Retrieved from http://www.azed.gov/research-evaluation/.
  10. Ariz. Rev. Stat. §15-203(A) (38).Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  12. Day, C. (2009). Capacity-building through layered leadership: Sustaining the turnaround. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership: Different perspectives, studies in educational leadership (Vol. 7, pp. 121–137). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field, (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Furman, G. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacobson, S., Johnson, L., Ylimaki, R., & Giles, C. (2005). Successful school leadership in changing times: Cross-national findings in the third year of an international research project. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 607–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, L. (2007). Rethinking successful school leadership in challenging US schools: Culturally responsive practices in school-community relationships. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35(3), 49–57.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, L., Møller, J., Pashiardis, P., Vedøy, G., & Savvides, V. (2011). Culturally responsive practices (pp. 75-102). In R. Ylimaki & S. Jacobson (Eds.), US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation: Implications for successful instructional leadership, organizational learning, and culturally responsive practices. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2003). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Paper prepared for the AERA Division A Task Force on Developing Research in Educational Leadership.Google Scholar
  19. Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. (2005). What we know about successful school leadership. In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A New Agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22–47). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Case studies as qualitative research. In C. F. Conrad, J. G. Haworth, & L. R. Lattuca (Eds.), Qualitative research in higher education (pp. 191–200). Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2009). Sustainable improvement: Building learning communities that endure. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. No Child Left Behind (NCLB). (2002). Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, §115, Stat. 1425.Google Scholar
  25. Rios-Aguilar, C., Gonzalez-Canche, M., & Moll, L. C. (2010). Implementing structured English immersion in Arizona: Benefits, costs, challenges, and opportunities. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/language-minority-students/implementing-structured-englishimmersion-sei-in-arizona-benefits-costs-challenges-and-opportunities.
  26. Seashore-Louis, K., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M., Mascall, B. et al. (2010). Investigating the links to student learning: Final report of research findings. Retrieved from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge-center/school-leadership/key-research/Documents/Investigating-the-Links-to-Improved-Student-Learning.pdf.
  27. US Census (2009). U.S. census data: Race, ethnicity, and poverty. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov.
  28. US Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top executive summary. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf.
  29. Ylimaki, R., & Brunner, C. C. (2011). Power and collaboration-consensus/conflict in curriculum leadership: Status-quo or change? American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1258–1285.Google Scholar
  30. Ylimaki, R., Bennett, J., Fan, J., & Villaseñor, E. (2012). Notions of ‘success’ in Southern Arizona schools: Principal leadership in changing demographic and border contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11(2), 168–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey V. Bennett
    • 1
  • Rose M. Ylimaki
    • 1
  • Thad M. Dugan
    • 1
  • Lynnette A. Brunderman
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Policy Studies and PracticeUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations