Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 57–75 | Cite as

Designing temporary systems: Exploring local school improvement intentions in the Swedish context

  • Daniel Nordholm
  • Ulf Blossing
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This article targets local school improvement in Sweden and temporary systems as a model to organize improvement work. These data are based on a qualitative case study of teacher groups constituting a temporary system representing the different subjects in comprehensive school in a medium-sized urban municipality. A total of eight interviews were carried out with the head of the education administration, two central school developers, one school district leader, and four principals. The intentions and descriptions of the early start of the project were analyzed deductively using temporary system theory in combination with the social- versus the techno-structure qualities of an organization. The results show a dominance of techno-structure qualities through the time, task, team, and transition concepts of the temporary system. This is particularly significant with regard to transition. The findings suggest that knowledge of the features and functions of temporary systems in schools is insufficient, in spite of the fact that it is often used as an improvement approach. Therefore, the authors argue that the socio-structure qualities should be considered more centrally in order to successfully promote the innovative and learning functions of the temporary system.

Keywords

Intentions Model design Organizational development School improvement Teacher collaboration Temporary systems 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Andersson, E., & Lander, R. (1988). Lägesbedömningar i en gymnasiereform: åtta skolors arbete med “En gymnasieskola för alla” (Status reports in a upper secondary school reform: eight schools’ work with”An upper secondary school for all”). Publikationer från Institutionen för pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet, 0282-2180; 1988:20. Göteborg.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, G. (1999). Skolkultur—nyckeln till skolans utveckling (School culture—the key for the development in schools). Göteborg: Gothia.Google Scholar
  3. Berg, G. (2003). Att förstå skolan: en teori om skolan som institution och skolor som organisationer (To understand schools: a theory on the school as an institution and schools as organizations). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  4. Björn, C., Ekman Philips, M., & Svensson, L. (Eds.). (2002). Organisera för utveckling och lärande. Om skolprojekt i nätverksform (Organizing for development and learning. School projects in networks). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  5. Dalin, P. (1994). Skolutveckling. Teori. Bok 2 (School development. Theory. Book 2). Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  6. Dalin, P. (1998). School development. Theories and strategies: An international handbook. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  7. Dalin, P. (2005). School development. Theories and strategies: An international handbook. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Dalin, P., Rolff, H.-G., & Kleekamp, B. (1993). Changing the school culture. London and New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  9. Ekholm, M. (1985). Fortbildningens historia. Stämningsbilder och funderingar (The history of in-job training. Mode images and reflection). Linköping: Skolledarutbildningen.Google Scholar
  10. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  11. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  12. Fullan, M., & Ballew, A. C. (2004). Leading in a culture of change: Personal action guide and workbook. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (1987). Change in schools. Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State Univ. of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2010). School and system improvement: State of the art review. (Keynote presentation for the 24th International Congress of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Limassol, Cyprus).Google Scholar
  17. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lander, R. (1985). Profeter i egen skola [Prophets in their own schools]. Rapport/Institutionen för pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet, 0282-2164; 1985:08. Mölndal.Google Scholar
  19. Lander, R., & Nylén, C. (1987). 10 skolors arbete med “En gymnasieskola för alla”: lägesrapport 2 (10 schools’ work with”An upper secondary school for all”: status report 2). Publikationer från Institutionen för pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet, 0282-2180; 1987:01. Göteborg.Google Scholar
  20. Liljequist, K. (2008). Skola och samhällsutveckling (Schools and the development of society). Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  21. Lundahl, L. (2002). From centralization to decentralization. Governance of education in Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 1(4), 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (1995). A theory of the temporary organization. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11, 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marklund, S. (1981). Skolsverige 1950–1975. Del 2. Försöksverksamheten (The Swedish school 1950-1975. Part 2. The experimental work). Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
  24. McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Miles, M. B. (1964). On temporary systems. In M. B. Miles (Ed.), Innovation in education (pp. 437–490). Columbia University, New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analyses (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Scherp, H.-Å. (2003). PBS—problembaserad skolutveckling: skolutveckling ur ett vardagsnära perspektiv [Problem-based school development: school development from a colloquial perspective]. Institutionen för utbildningsvetenskap, Karlstads universitet.Google Scholar
  30. Scherp, H.-Å. (2011). Varför gör vi det vi gör när det som händer händer? [Why are we doing what we are doing when what happens happens?]. In U. Blossing (Ed.), Skolledaren i fokus—kunskap, värden och verktyg. Studentlitteratur: Lund.Google Scholar
  31. SOU. (1974). Skolans arbetsmiljö. Betänkande utgivet av Utredningen om skolans inre arbete—SIA [The schools’ working environment. Report published by the study on schools’ internal work—SIA]. Stockholm: Department of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Stake, R. E. (2005). Case Studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 443–466). California: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research. Design and methods (4th ed.). California: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.University of GothenburgGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options