Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 403–422 | Cite as

Professional norms in school leadership: Change efforts in implementation of education for sustainable development

  • Ulf Leo
  • Per Wickenberg
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study identifies and analyses professional norms as a means of illuminating school cultures and how norms are distributed in the system. Of special interest is the role of school leaders and how they lead, organize and realise school development. The study research question is: What professional norms do school leaders highlight in change efforts? We are also interested in identifying the support mechanisms and obstacles to implementation and norm setting exhibited by school organisations. The case we used explores change processes in the implementation of education for sustainable development at three upper secondary schools in Sweden. It was conducted in three phases, starting with a questionnaire for all teachers and principals. In the second phase, each of the principals was interviewed individually. The third phase used focus groups consisting of the principals that made up the leadership groups. Our results indicate that professional norms are set when principals and teachers experience expectations from each other, from students and from policy documents. There is also a need for well-functioning communication in the organisation to set and disseminate norms. The school principal plays a crucial role in these norm setting processes. By becoming more aware of existing norms in the organisations, and how norms can be changed, this knowledge can support principals in change efforts.

Keywords

Change efforts Education for sustainable development Professional norms Principals Leadership 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson, M. (2002). Understanding organizational culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Ärlestig, H. (2008). Communication between principals and teachers in successful schools. Doctoral thesis, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  5. Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. The American Political Science Review, 4, 1095–1111.Google Scholar
  6. Baier, M., & Svensson, M. (2009). Om normer. Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  7. Blossing, U. (2008). Kompetens för samspelande skolor, om skolorganisationer och skolförbättring. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
  8. Breiting, S., & Wickenberg, P. (2010). The progressive development of environmental education in Sweden and Denmark. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Day, C. (2007). What being a successful principal really means. Educational Leadership and Administration, 19, 13–24.Google Scholar
  10. Durkheim, E. (1982). The rules of sociological method and selected texts on sociology and it′s method. (New York: Free Press) [ori.1895. Les règles de la méthode sociologique].Google Scholar
  11. Education Act (Swedish Code of Statutes 1985:1100).Google Scholar
  12. Education Act (Swedish Code of Statutes 2010:800).Google Scholar
  13. Elster, J. (1992). The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  15. Fullan, M. (2005). Leadership and sustainability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  16. Giddens, A. (1989). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to Fade Away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration Leadership,. doi: 10.1177/1741143204039297.Google Scholar
  20. Harris, A. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(2), 172–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, A. (2011). Distributed leadership: Implications for the role of the principal. Journal of Management Development, 31(1), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hechter, M., & Opp, K.-D. (Eds.). (2001). Social norms. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Hemmelgarn, A. L., Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2006). Organizational culture and climate: Implications for services and interventions research. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 13(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (2008). Educational administration, theory, research, and practice. New York: The McGraw Companies.Google Scholar
  26. Hydén, H. (2002). Normvetenskap. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
  27. Hydén, H., & Svensson, M. (2008). The concept of norms in sociology of law. Law and Society, Scandinavian studies in Law, 53, 15–32.Google Scholar
  28. Jensen, B. B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach. Environmental Education, Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jickling, B. (2003). Environmental education and environmental advocacy. Revisited. Journal of Environmental Education, 34(2), 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jickling, B., & Spork, H. (1998). Education for the environment: A critique. Environmental Education Research, 4(3), 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jickling, B., & Wals, A. E. J. (2008). Globalization and environmental education: Looking beyond sustainable development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leithwood, K., & Day, C. (2008). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes, School Leadership & Management. Formerly School Organisation, 28(1), 1–4.Google Scholar
  33. Leo, U. (2010). Rektorer bör och rektorer gör. Dissertation, Lund university.Google Scholar
  34. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (2002). Changing leadership for changing times. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Miles, M. B., Ekholm, M., & Vanderberghe, R. (1987). Lasting school improvement: Exploring the process of instititionalization. Leuven/Amersfoort: Acco.Google Scholar
  36. Mogensen, F., & Schnack, K. (2010). The action competence approach and the ‘new’ discourses of education for sustainable development, competence and quality criteria. Environmental Education Research, 16(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Öhman, J. (2008). Environmental ethics and democratic responsibility: A pluralistic approach to ESD. In J. Öhman (Ed.), Values in democracy in education for sustainable development: contributions from Swedish research: Environmental ethics and responsibility (pp. 17–32). Malmö: Liber.Google Scholar
  39. Öhman, J., & Öhman, M. (2012a). Participatory approach in practice: an analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environmental Education Research, doi:  10.1080/13504622.2012.695012.
  40. Öhman, M., & Öhman, J. (2012b). Harmoni eller konflikt? En fallstudie av meningsinnehållet i utbildning för hållbar utveckling. NorDiNa, 8, 59–72.Google Scholar
  41. Persson, L. (2010). Pedagogerna och demokratin. Doctoral thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
  42. Pont, B., Nusche, D., & Moorman, H. (2008). Improving School Leadership, Volume 1 Policy and Practice”. Retrieved August 15, 2012, from http://www.oecd.org/education/preschoolandschool/41200009.pdf.
  43. Robbins, S. (1998). Organizational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  44. Rommetveit, R. (1955). Social norms and roles, explorations in the psychology of ending social pressures. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  45. Starratt, R. (2004). Ethical leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Svensson, M. (2008). Sociala normer och regelefterlevnad: trafiksäkerhetsfrågor ur ett rättssociologiskt perspektiv. Doctoral thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
  47. Swedish National Agency of Education. (1994). Curriculum for the Upper Secondary School 1994. Google Scholar
  48. Therborn, G. (2002). Back to norms! On the scope and dynamics of norms and normative action. Current Sociology, 50, 863–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Törnsén, M. (2009). Successful principal leadership: Prerequisites, processes and outcomes. Dissertation, Umeå University.Google Scholar
  50. Wickenberg, P. (1999). Normstödjande strukturer: miljötematiken börjar slå rot i skolan. Dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
  51. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved August 15, 2012 from http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/42/ares42-187.htm/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology of LawLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options