Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 259–281 | Cite as

Informal learning organizations as part of an educational ecology: Lessons from collaboration across the formal-informal divide

  • Jennifer Lin Russell
  • Karen Knutson
  • Kevin Crowley
Article
First Online:

Abstract

How do informal learning organizations work with schools as part of a broader educational ecology? We examined this question through a comparative case study of two collaborative efforts whereby informal arts education organizations, a children’s museum and a community-based organization, worked with an urban school district to redefine the provision of educational services for children and youth. Grounded conceptually in organizational theory, our study identified factors that enable and constrain collaboration across the formal-informal divide. We argue that examining the dynamics of cross-sector collaboration as occurring within a regional ecology of diverse learning organizations and broader institutional context provides insights into the outcomes of joint work. Our findings have implications for designing collaborations between schools and informal organizations that contribute to their respective strength, as well as the broader regional educational ecology in which they reside.

Keywords

Informal learning organizations Collaboration Educational ecology Institutional context 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Akiva, T. (2012). The psychology of youth participation in organized activities. Unpublished dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, D. (1999). A Commonwealth: Museums in the Learning Age. A report to the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
  3. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecologies perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  6. Bevan, B., Dillon, J., Hein, G. E., Macdonald, M., Michalchik, V., Miller, D., et al. (2010). Making science matter: Collaborations between informal science education organizations and schools. Washington, DC: Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
  7. Bodilly, S. J., Augustine, C., & Zakaras, L. (2008). Revitalizing arts education through community-wide coordination. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  8. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Burch, P. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calabrese Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin: Agency, identity and learning in a green energy program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, B. & Graddy, E. A. (2005). Interorganizational collaborations for public service delivery: A framework of preconditions, processes, and perceived outcomes. Paper presented at the 2005 ARNOVA Conference, November 17–19, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Coburn, C. (2001). Collective sensemaking about reading: How teachers mediate reading policy in their professional communities. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(2), 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coburn, C. E. (2005). The role of nonsystem actors in the relationship between policy and practice: The case of reading instruction in California. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(1), 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coburn, C. E., Bae, S., & Turner, E. O. (2008). Authority, status, and the dynamics of insider-outsider partnerships at the district level. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 364–399.Google Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwards, C. P., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. E. (1993). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach–advanced reflections. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  18. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 percent solution. American Scientist, 98(6), 486–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, B., & Wood, D. (1991). Collaborative alliances: Moving from practice to theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gutwill, J., & Allen, S. (2012). Deepening students scientific inquiry skills during a science museum field trip. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 130–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halverson, E. R. (2012). Digital art-making as a representational process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1–42.Google Scholar
  23. Hardy, C. (1994). Power and politics in organizations. In C. Hardy (Ed.), Managing strategic action (pp. 220–237). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hess, F., Muranto, R., & Milliman, S. (2001). Small districts in big trouble: How four Arizona school systems respond to charter competition. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1102–1124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hetlund, L., Winner, E., Veenema, S., & Sheridan, K. (2007). Studio thinking: The real benefits of arts education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hofstein, A., & Rosenfeld, S. (1996). Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning. Studies in Science Education, 28, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Honig, M. I. (2004). The new middle management: Intermediary organizations in education policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Honig, M. I. (2009). External organizations and the politics of urban educational leadership: The case of new small autonomous schools initiatives. Peabody Journal of Education, 84, 394–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Honig, M. I., & Ikemoto, G. (2008). Adaptive assistance for learning improvement efforts: The case of the Institute for Learning. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(3), 328–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inverness Research Associates. (1996). An invisible infrastructure. Washington, DC: Association of Science-Technology Centers.Google Scholar
  31. Ito, M., Baumer, S., Bittainti, M., Boyd, D., Cody, R., Herr-Stephenson, B., et al. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Jackson, K. (2011). Approaching participation in school-based mathematics as a cross-setting phenomenon. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 111–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James Irvine Foundation. (2005). Museums after school: How museums are reaching kids, partnering with schools, and making a difference. Author. Retrieved from: http://www.irvine.org/assets/pdf/pubs/former/Museums_After_School.pdf.
  34. Legler, R., & Reischl, T. (2003). The relationship of key factors in the process of collaboration: A study of school-to-work coalitions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. R. (2003). The marketplace in education. Review of Research in Education, 27, 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lundin, M. (2007). When does cooperation improve public policy implementation? The Policy Studies Journal, 35(4), 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., & Deal, T. E. (1981). Institutional and technical sources of organizational structure: Explaining the structure of educational organizations. In H. B. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the human services (pp. 151–178). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Museums, Libraries and Archives Council. (2008). Inspiring learning: An improvement framework for museums, libraries and archives. Retrieved from http://www.inspiringlearningforall.gov.uk/
  41. O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57, 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ogawa, R. T. (1994). The institutional sources of educational reform: The case of school-based management. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 519–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pasquero, J. (1991). Supra-organizational collaboration: The Canadian environmental experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 38–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pfeffer, J. (1997). New directions for organization theory: Problems and prospects. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  47. Phillips, M., Finkelstein, D., & Wever-Frerichs, S. (2007). School site to museum floor: How informal science institutions work with schools. International Journal of Science Education, 29(12), 1489–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2000). Inter-organizational collaboration and the dynamics of institutional fields. Journal of Management Studies, 37(1), 23–43.Google Scholar
  49. Ramey-Gassert, L. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78, 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rowan, B., & Miskel, C. G. (1999). Institutional theory and the study of educational organizations. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  51. Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The organization of societal sectors: Propositions and early evidence. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108–142). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Sharfman, M. P., Gray, B., & Yan, A. (1991). The context of interorganizational collaboration in the garment industry: An institutional perspective. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spillane, J., & Burch, P. (2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  54. Thatcher, D. (2004). Interorganizational partnerships as inchoate hierarchies: A case study of the community security initiative. Administration and Society, 36(1), 91–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thompson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, J. K. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, J. K. (2008). Linking collaboration processes and outcomes: Foundations for advancing empirical theory. In L. B. Bingham & R. O’Leary (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management (pp. 97–120). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe Publishers.Google Scholar
  57. Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  63. Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2010). Connecting with art: How families talk about art in a museum setting. In M.K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines, 189–206.Google Scholar
  64. Knutson, K., Crowley, K., Russell, J. L., & Steiner, M. A. (2011). Approaching art education as an ecology: Exploring the role of museums. Studies in Art Education, 52(4), 326–338.Google Scholar
  65. Palmquist, S.D., & Crowley, K. (2007). From teachers to testers: Parents’ role in child expertise development in informal settings. Science Education, 91(5), 712–732.Google Scholar
  66. Russell, J. L. (2011). From Child’s Garden to Academic Press: The role of shifting institutional logics in redefining kindergarten education. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 236–267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Lin Russell
    • 1
  • Karen Knutson
    • 1
  • Kevin Crowley
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options