Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 203–232 | Cite as

Levers for sustainable improvement of Spanish schools in challenging contexts

  • Julián López-Yáñez
  • Marita Sánchez-Moreno
Article

Abstract

The need for innovation in the Spanish educational system has become more evident in the wake of the last PISA reports. To find our own way to achieve better schools we must take advantage of what schools that managed to sustain changes over time have learnt from such a process. This paper reports on findings from an inquiry that tried to shed light on the knowledge embedded in the practices of schools commended by external advisers as they had institutionalized a recognisable dynamic of changes. In order to meet this goal, five primary, four secondary and one special education school—most of them in challenging contexts—from two different regions in Spain were studied by means of ethnographic methodologies. The results described in this paper depict the main levers for improvement shared by these schools. Important support for change processes was found in the narratives deployed about the disadvantaged context surrounding the schools and the high value of teaching in these circumstances. On the other hand, the leadership that supported the change dynamics was clearly distributed and the leaders used diverse power sources in order to tackle changing contexts. Other key factors that apparently facilitated the sustainability of change were the priority given to supportive school climates; organizational cultures that encouraged teachers to take risks and essay new ways of teaching; and the practice of innovation by adopting an emergent, unplanned, free-flowing pattern. These findings are discussed in the light of common issues of the recent school improvement literature such as: sustainability, organizational knowledge and learning, communities of practice and building capacity to change.

Keywords

Building capacity Collaboration Communities of practice Educational innovation Organizational knowledge School improvement Spanish educational system Sustainability Trust 

Abbreviations

LODE

Ley Orgánica 8/1985 reguladora del Derecho a la Educación

LOGSE

Ley Orgánica 1/1990 de Ordenación General del Sistema Educativo

Notes

Acknowledgments

The paper is based on the research project: López-Yáñez, J. (Head) “Liderazgo y desarrollo sostenibles en las organizaciones educativas”, granted by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, National Plan of Research + Development + innovation (2005–2008 reference: SEJ2005-09056/EDUC). The authors also acknowledge the decisive contribution made to project by the rest of the research team: Altopiedi, M., Lavié, J. M., López-Jiménez, L. C., Murillo, P. (Universidad de Sevilla); Arencibia, J. S., Delgado-Betancor, U., Comini, F., Nogales, M. (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria).

References

  1. Adler, P. S., & Heckscher, C. (2006). Towards collaborative community. In C. Heckscher & P. S. Adler (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy (pp. 11–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ainscow, M., & West, M. (2006). Improving urban schools: Leadership and collaboration. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, D., & Crowther, F. (2002). Parallel leadership: A clue to the contents of the “black box” of school reform. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(4), 152–159.Google Scholar
  4. Apple, M., & Beane, J. (Eds.). (1995). Democratic schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  5. Bain, A., Walker, A., & Chan, A. (2011). Self-organisation and capacity building: Sustaining the change. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 701–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ball, S. J. (2008). New philanthropy, new networks and new governance in education. Political Studies, 56(4), 747–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banathy, B. A. (1997). Information, evolution, and change. Journal of Systemic Practice and Action Research, 10(1), 59–84.Google Scholar
  8. Barth, R. (2003). Lessons learned: Shaping relationships and the culture of the workplace. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bates, R. (2006). Culture and leadership in educational administration: A historical study of what was and what might have been. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 38(2), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bates, R. (2008). States, markets and communities: Is there room for educational leadership? Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(3), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolívar, A. (2004). La autonomía de centros escolares en España: Entre declaraciones discursivas y prácticas sobrerreguladas [The autonomy of schools in Spain: Between statements and over-regulated practices]. Revista de Educación, 333, 91–116.Google Scholar
  12. Bolívar, A., & Moreno, J. M. (2006). Between transaction and transformation. The role of school principals as education leaders in Spain. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brouwer, P., Brekelmans, M., Nieuwenhuis, L., & Simons, R. J. (2012). Communities of practice in the school workplace. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(3), 346–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryk, A. S., Camburns, E., & Seashore Louis, K. (1999). Professional community in Chicago elementary schools: Facilitating factors and organizational consequences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(5), 751–781.Google Scholar
  15. Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Buchanan, D. A., Addicott, R., Fitzgerald, L., Ferlie, E., & Baeza, J. I. (2007). Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare. Human Relations, 60(7), 1065–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clarke, P. (2002). Learning schools, learning systems. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, P., Reynolds, D., & Harris, A. (2005). Challenging the challenged: Developing an improvement programme for schools facing extremely challenging circumstances. In P. Clarke (Ed.), Improving schools in difficulty (pp. 7–21). London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2005). Learning/becoming/organizing. Organization, 12(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24, 249–305.Google Scholar
  21. Cook, N., & Yanow, D. (2011). Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(4), 362–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crowther, F. (2011). From school improvement to sustained capacity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  23. Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2003). Extending educational reform. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  24. Day, C. (2005). Sustaining success in challenging contexts: Leadership in English schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Day, C., Hadfield, M., & Kellow, M. (2002). Schools as learning communities: Building capacity through network learning. Education 313, 30(3), 19–22.Google Scholar
  26. De Puelles, M. (2002). Descentralización de la educación en el estado autonómico [Educational de-centralization in the autonomous state]. In Informe España 2002. Una interpretación de la realidad social [Spain 2002 report. An interpretation of the social reality] (pp. 143–241). Madrid: Fundación Encuentro (Encuentro Fundation).Google Scholar
  27. Denton, J. (1998). Organization learning and effectiveness. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Dinham, S., & Crowther, F. (2011). Sustainable school capacity building—One step back, two steps forward? Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 616–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  30. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces. Probing the depths of educational reform. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119–157.Google Scholar
  33. Furman, G. C. (2004). The ethic of community. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(2), 215–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gherardi, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge: The texture of workplace learning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Gray, J. (2001). Introduction. In M. Maden (Ed.), Success against the odds: Five years on. Revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas (pp. 1–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Gray, J. (2005). Some issues and problems in evaluating changes and improvements in ‘low-performing’ schools. In P. Clarke (Ed.), Improving schools in difficulty (pp. 81–93). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  37. Greenfield, W. D. (Ed.). (1987). Instructional leadership. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  38. Gronn, P. (2010). Leadership: Its genealogy, configuration and trajectory. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(4), 405–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hadfield, M. (2003). Building capacity versus growing schools. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 107–120). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  40. Hanna, D. (1997). The organization as an open system. In A. Harris, N. Bennett, & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 13–21). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hargreaves, A. (1998). Introduction. Pushing the boundaries of educational change. In A. Hargreaves, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (Vol. 2, pp. 281–294). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  42. Hargreaves, A. (2002). Sustainability of educational change: The role of social geographies. Journal of Educational Change, 3(3–4), 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Professional learning communities and performance training sects. The emerging apartheid of school improvement. In A. Harris, C. Day, M. Hadfield, D. Hopkins, A. Hargreaves, & C. Chapman (Eds.), Effective leadership for school improvement (pp. 180–195). London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  44. Hargreaves, A. (2007). Sustainable leadership and development in education: Creating the future, conserving the past. European Journal of Education, 42(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hargreaves, A. (2009). Leadership succession and sustainable improvement: promoting stability by distributing duties, networking across district lines and professional coaching of administrator newcomers. School Administrator, 66(11).Google Scholar
  46. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2004). The seven principles of sustainable leadership. Educational Leadership, 61(7), 8–13.Google Scholar
  47. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). Sustainable leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Hargreaves, D. H. (2001). A capital theory of school effectiveness and improvement. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hargreaves, D. H. (2011). System redesign for system capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 685–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris, A. (2002). School improvement: What’s in it for schools?. London: Routledge/Falmer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harris, A. (2006). Leading change in schools in difficulty. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harris, A. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 624–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harris, A., & Chapman, C. (2001). Leadership in schools facing challenging circumstances. London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  54. Harris, A., Gunraj, J., James, S., Clarke, P., & Harris, B. (2006). Improving schools in exceptionally challenging circumstances: Tales from the front line. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  55. Harris, A., & Lambert, L. (2003). Building leadership capacity for school improvement. London: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  56. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership—Improvement through empowerment? An overview of the literature. Educational Management and Administration, 31(4), 437–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Hartley, D. (2009). Education policy, distributed leadership and socio-cultural theory. Educational Review, 61(2), 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hartley, D. (2010). The management of education and the social theory of the firm: From distributed leadership to collaborative community. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 42(4), 345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(2), 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hernández, F. (2006). El informe PISA: una oportunidad para replantear el sentido del aprender en la escuela secundaria [PISA Report: A way of reconsidering learning in secondary education]. Revista de Educación, num. extraordinario, 357–379.Google Scholar
  62. Hernes, T., & Bakken, T. (2003). Implications of self-reference: Niklas Luhmann’s autopoiesis and organization theory. Organization Studies, 24(9), 1511–1535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hoban, G. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Hopkins, D. (2001). School improvement for real. London: Falmer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1994). School improvement in an era of change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  66. Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1997). School improvement—Propositions for action. In A. Harris, N. Bennett, & M. Preedy (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness and improvement in education (pp. 262–270). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
  68. King, M. B., & Bouchard, K. (2011). The capacity to build organizational capacity in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (2004). Trust and distrust in organizations: Dilemmas and approaches. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  70. Lambert, L. (2005). What does leadership capacity really mean? Journal of Staff Development, 26(2), 38–40.Google Scholar
  71. Lambert, L. (2006). Lasting leadership: A study of high leadership capacity Schools. The Educational Forum, 70(3), 238–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lambert, L. (2007). Lasting leadership: Towards sustainable school improvement. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lavié, J. M. (2006). Academic discourses on school-based teacher collaboration: Revisiting the arguments. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(5), 773–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Levin, B. (2006). Schools in challenging circumstances: A reflection on what we know and what we need to know. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Levin, B. (2008). How to change 5000 schools: A practical and positive approach for leading change at every level. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  77. Maden, M. (Ed.). (2001). Success against the odds—Five years on: Revisiting effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge/Falmer.Google Scholar
  78. Maden, M., & Hillman, J. (Eds.). (1993). Success against the odds: Effective schools in disadvantaged areas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Marchesi, A. (2006). El informe PISA y la política educativa en España [PISA report and educational policies in Spain]. Revista de Educación, num. extraordinario, 337–355.Google Scholar
  80. McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Miller, R. J., & Rowan, B. (2006). Effects of organic management on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 219–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de España. (2011). Datos y cifras. Curso escolar 2011-12 [Ministry of Education, Spanish Government. Data and figures. Academic year 2011-12]. Retrieved from: http://www.educacion.gob.es.
  83. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  84. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2000). Profound improvement: Building capacity for a learning community. Downington, PA: Lisse, Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  85. Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. (2004). Improving schools in economically disadvantaged areas: A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15(2), 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mulford, B., & Moreno, J. M. (2006). Sinking ships, emerging leadership: A true story of sustainability (or the lack thereof). The Educational Forum, 70(3), 204–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Murphy, J., Smylie, M., Mayrowetz, D., & Seashore Louis, K. (2009). The role of the principal in fostering the development of distributed leadership. School Leadership & Management, 29(2), 181–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Myers, K., & Stoll, L. (1998). No quick fixes: Improving schools in difficulty. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  89. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Reynolds, D., Harris, A., Clarke, P., James, S., & Harris, B. (2006). Challenging the challenged: Developing an improvement programme for schools facing exceptionally challenging circumstances. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 425–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Robinson, V. M. J. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Robinson, V. M. J., & Timperley, H. S. (2007). The leadership of the improvement of teaching and learning: Lessons from initiatives with positive outcomes for students. Australian Journal of Education, 51(3), 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rowan, B. (1995). The organizational design of schools. In S. B. Bacharach & B. Mundell (Eds.), Images of schools. Structures and roles in organizational behavior (pp. 11–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  94. Samier, E. A. (2010). The interdisciplinary foundation of trust. From trustworthiness to betrayal. In E. A. Samier & M. Schmidt (Eds.), Trust and betrayal in educational administration and leadership (pp. 4–12). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  96. Seashore Louis, K. (1994). Beyond ‘managed change’: Rethinking how schools improve. Journal of School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Seashore Louis, K., Mayrowetz, D., Smiley, M., & Murphy, J. (2009). The role of sensemaking and trust in developing distributed leadership. In A. Harris (Ed.), Distributed leadership. Different perspectives (pp. 157–180). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Seashore Louis, K., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  99. Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., & Luppescu, S. (2006). The essential supports for school improvement. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research at The University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  100. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  101. Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. London: Norton.Google Scholar
  102. Slater, L. (2008). Pathways to building leadership capacity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22(1), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  105. Spillane, J. P., & Diamond, J. B. (Eds.). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  106. Stacey, R. D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  107. Stoll, L. (1999). Realising our potential: Understanding and developing capacity for lasting improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10, 503–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Stoll, L., & Seashore Louis, K. (Eds.). (2007). Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Strike, K. A. (2000). Schools as communities: Four metaphors, three models, and a dilemma or two. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(4), 617–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Robertson, M. (2002). The construction of ‘communities of practice’ in the management of innovation. Management Learning, 33(4), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Tiana Ferrer, A. (2007). A la búsqueda del consenso en educación: La experiencia de la LOE [In search of consensus in education: The experience of the LOE]. Revista de Educación, 344, 83–100.Google Scholar
  114. Timperley, H. (2005). Distributed leadership: Developing theory from practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(6), 395–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Timperley, H. (2008). A distributed perspective on leadership and enhancing valued outcomes for students. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(6), 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Timperley, H. (2011). Knowledge and the leadership of learning. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(2), 145–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(4), 308–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tschannen-Moran, M. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  119. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2000). A Multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593.Google Scholar
  121. Tsoukas, H. (2002). Where does new organizational knowledge come from? Glasgow: The University of Strathclyde, Graduate School of Business. Working Paper Series: 2002-15.Google Scholar
  122. Voulalas, Z. D., & Sharpe, F. G. (2005). Creating schools as learning communities: Obstacles and processes. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Walker, K., Kutsyuruba, B., & Noonan, B. (2011). The fragility of trust in the world of school principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(5), 471–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  126. West, M. (2000). Supporting school improvement: Observations on the inside, reflections from the outside. School Leadership & Management, 20(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Westheimer, J. (1999). Communities and consequences: An inquiry into ideology and practice in teachers’ professional work. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 71–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wrigley, T. (2008). School improvement in a neo-liberal world. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 40(2), 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julián López-Yáñez
    • 1
  • Marita Sánchez-Moreno
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Teaching and School Organization, Faculty of EducationUniversidad de SevillaSevilleSpain

Personalised recommendations