Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 51–71 | Cite as

Incorporating creativity into teachers practice and self-concept of professional identity

  • Trevor Davies
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The study explores what happens to teachers practice and professional identity when they adopt a collaborative action research approach to teaching and involve external creative partners and a university mentor. The teachers aim to nurture and develop the creative potential of their learners through empowering them to make decisions for themselves about their own progress and learning directions. The teachers worked creatively and collaboratively designing creative teaching and learning methods in support of pupils with language and communication difficulties. The respondents are from an English special school, primary school and girls secondary school. A mixed methods methodology is adopted. Gains in teacher confidence and capability were identified in addition to shifts in values that impacted directly on their self-concept of what it is to be an effective teacher promoting effective learning. The development of their professional identities within a team ethos included them being able to make decisions about learning that are based on the educational potential of learners that they proved resulted in elevated standards achieved by this group of learners. They were able to justify their actions on established educational principles. Tensions however were revealed between what they perceived as their normal required professionalism imposed by external agencies and the enhanced professionalism experienced working through the project where they were able to integrate theory and practice.

Keywords

Teacher identity Teacher professionalism Teacher professionality Creative teaching Creative learning Creative potential Teacher collaboration Professional learning community 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

CapeUK who provided funding for the research and the project ‘Creativity and Action Research Awards Two’ (CARA2).

References

  1. Aubusson, P., Steele, F., Dinham, S., & Brady, L. (2008). Action learning in teacher learning community formation: informative or transformative? Teacher Development, 11(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barak, M., & Doppelt, Y. (1998). Promoting creative thinking within technology education. Washington, DC: Paper Presented at the International Workshop Seminar for Scholars in Technology Education.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, J. (2008). Governmental professionalism: Re-professionalising or de-professionalising teachers in England. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosher, M., & Hazlewood, P. (2008). Leading the leaders for the future. UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Brighouse, T. (2008). Putting professional development centre stage. Oxford Review of Education, 34(3), 313–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. CapeUK (2005) CARA—Building creative futures. Retrieved August 1, 2010, from CapeUK website: http://www.capeuk.org/capeuk-resources/building-creative-futures.html.
  7. CapeUK. (2006). CARA2; the handbook. England: Arts Council.Google Scholar
  8. Craft, A. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon, USA and Canada: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cresswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing amongst the five traditions. California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, T. (2002). Creativity: its contribution to design and technology education. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis. Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, T. (2006). Creative teaching and learning in Europe: Promoting a new paradigm. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking Hats. England: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
  13. De Bono, E. (1992). Serious creativity. London: Harper Collins Business.Google Scholar
  14. De Bono, E. (2010) The ‘six thinking hats’ for schools. Retrieved December 6, 2010, from DeBono website: http://www.edwdebono.com/shcd1.htm.
  15. Department for Education and Employment. (1999). All our futures: Creativity culture and education. Suffolk: DFEE publications.Google Scholar
  16. Ehren, M. C. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2008). The relationship between school inspections, school characteristics and school improvement. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(2), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.Google Scholar
  18. Feldman, D., Csikztenmihayli, M., & Gardner, H. (1995). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. USA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  19. Frowe, I. (2005). Professional trust. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(1), 34–53.Google Scholar
  20. Fryer, M. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman.Google Scholar
  21. Goodson, I., & Hargreaves, A. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher’s professional lives (New Prospect Series).. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Handy, C. (1995). The empty raincoat. Reading: Arrow Books Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. California: Corwin.Google Scholar
  24. Hoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. In V. Houghton, et al. (Eds.), Management in education: The management of organisations and individuals. London: Ward Lock Educational in association with Open University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hoyle, E. (Ed.). (1981). Managerial processes in schools. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hoyle, E., & John, P. D. (1995). Professional knowledge and professional practice. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  27. Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: Distinctions and relationship. Journal of Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LeBoeuf, M. (1994). Creative thinking. London: Judy Piatkus.Google Scholar
  29. Newby, P. (2010). Research methods for education. England: Pearson.Google Scholar
  30. Rogers, M., & Fasciato, M. (2005). Can creativity be assessed? Conference paper, British Educational Research Association conference September 14–17, 2005; University of Glamorgan. Retrieved October 6, 2010, from BERA website: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/150029.htm.
  31. Royal Society of Arts. (2010). Opening minds. Retrieved December 6, 2010 from RSA website: http://www.thersa.org/projects/opening-minds.
  32. Seltzer, K., & Bentley, T. (1999). The creative age: Knowledge and skills for the new economy. London: DEMOS.Google Scholar
  33. Shoulksmith, G. (1970). Intelligence, creativity and cognitive style. London: Batsford.Google Scholar
  34. Smyth, J. (2007) Teacher development against the policy reform grain: An argument for recapturing relationships in teaching and learning. Teacher development, 11(2), 221–236.Google Scholar
  35. Torrance, E. P. (1962) Torrance tests of creative thinking. Indiana: Bensenville.Google Scholar
  36. UNICEF. (2007). Report card 7, child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries. Retrieved November 11, 2010, from UNICEF website: http://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/494.
  37. Woods, P. (2002). In C. Sugrue & C. Day (Eds.), Developing teachers and teaching practice: International research perspectives. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  38. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (revised edition). Applied Social Research Methods Series Vol. 5. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Education, University of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options