Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 449–485 | Cite as

Strong agents and weak systems: University support for school level improvement

  • James H. Nehring
  • Ellen J. O’Brien
Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study examined individual and school level factors that advance and suppress the traits of high performing schools. Based on action plans and reflective journals of 28 school level practitioners in 14 schools across 10 school districts, researchers tracked the progress of each practitioner from participation in a university-based school improvement institute through the initial 5 months of action plan implementation at the school site. This study also presents a conceptual model for a strong system, based on an extensive literature review. Findings are as follows: (1) Internal, school-level change agents who are knowledgeable and skillful with the traits of strong systems were able to make significant inroads within weak systems. (2) School and district level leadership knowledgeable and skillful with the traits of strong systems were crucial to the sustainability of improvement efforts. (3) The effectiveness of change agents in initiating improvement did not necessarily align with positional power, confirming prior complexity research findings that posit non-linearity of change. (4) Effective change agents focused in their work with colleagues on the cultivation of intellectual dispositions and complex skills. Such activity stands in contrast to much contemporary Professional Learning Community (PLC) work (so called) that focuses on “training” teachers in scripted procedures and suggests that much contemporary PLC work needs to be redirected from the learning of procedural skills to the cultivation of intellectual dispositions and complex skills. University colleges of education, whose signature traditions include inquiry, analysis, and reflection, are well-positioned to support such work.

Keywords

Complex adaptive systems Complexity research Professional learning community School improvement School reform University partnerships 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Graduate School of Education at the University of Massachusetts Lowell for a Paquin-Adams Grant Award which supported this research. We are also grateful to Stuart P. Robertson whose expertise with QSR NVIVO Software assisted the authors in the design and use of our NVIVO shell.

References

  1. Ancess, J. (2003). Beating the odds: High schools as communities of commitment. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bines, H., & Welton, J. (1995). Developing and managing partnership. In H. Bines & J. Welton (Eds.), Managing partnership in teacher training and development (pp. 11–30). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Brophy, J. E. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(5), 631–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Calhoun, E., & Joyce, B. (2005). “Inside out” and “outside in:” Learning from past and present school improvement paradigms. In D. Hopkins (Ed.), The practice and theory of school improvement, international handbook of educational change (pp. 252–264). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chrispeels, J., Burke, P., Johnson, P., & Daly, A. (2008). Aligning mental models of district and school leadership teams for reform. Education and Urban Society, 40(6), 730–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran-Smith, M., Davis, D., & Fries, K. (2004). Multicultural teacher education: Research, practice, and policy. In J. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 931–975). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  9. Colombo, M., Boccia, J., Laboy, W., Torres, H., & Nehring, J. (2007, April). The Lawrence Public Schools transformation project: Cultivating university and school district partnerships. Paper presented at the conference of the committee on industrial theory and assessment (CITA), Lowell, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, H. M., Findley, M., & Good, T. (1982). Relations between student achievement and various indexes of teacher expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(4), 577–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper, H. M., & Tom, D. Y. (1984). Teacher expectation research: A review with implications for classroom instruction. Elementary School Journal, 85(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuban, L. (1986). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890 to 1980. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Dooley, K. (1997). A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 1(1), 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  15. Educational Testing Service. (1991). A report on the impact of We the People & the Citizen and the Constitution. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.civiced.org/index.php?page=wtp_introduction.
  16. Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, A. (2009). No child left behind and the quest for educational equity: The role of teachers’ collective sense of efficacy. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fennema, E., Carpenter, T., Franke, M., Levi, L., Jacobs, V., & Empson, S. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flowers, N., Mertens, S., & Mulhall, P. (1999). The impact of teaming: Five research-based outcomes of teaming. Middle School Journal, 31(2), 57–60.Google Scholar
  20. Fullan, M. (2010). Positive pressure. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change (pp. 119–130). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 914–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fisherman, B., & Soloway, E. (2008). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban school reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goddard, Y., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109(4), 877–896.Google Scholar
  24. Goodlad, J. (1988). School-university partnerships for educational renewal: Rationale and concepts. In J. Goodlad & K. Sirotnik (Eds.), School-university partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns (pp. 3–31). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Griffith, P. L., Kimmel, S. J., & Biscoe, B. (2010). Teacher professional development for at-risk preschoolers: Closing the achievement gap by closing the instruction gap. Action in Teacher Education, 31(2), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gruenert, S. (2005). Correlations of collaborative school cultures with student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010a). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010b). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(2), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011a). Conceptual and methodological issues in studying school leadership effects as a reciprocal process. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2), 149–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011b). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hanh, T. (2004, July). There is no path to peace. The path is peace. 2003 address to Congress. Shambhala Sun. Retrieved from http://www.shambhalasun.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=1510.
  33. Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (2010). Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  34. Harris, A. (2011). System improvement through collective capacity building. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(6), 624–636.Google Scholar
  35. Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change, 8(4), 337–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hathaway, W. E. (1985, April). Models of school university collaboration: National and local perspective on collaborations that work. Paper presented at the American educational research association, Chicago (ERIC document reproduction services no. ED 253 973).Google Scholar
  37. Hopkins, D. (2007). Every school a great school. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
  38. Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Lab.Google Scholar
  39. Howard, J. (2003). Still at risk: The causes and costs of failure to educate poor and minority children for the twenty-first century. In D. T. Gordon (Ed.), A nation reformed? American education twenty years after “A Nation at Risk”. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  40. Hoy, W. K., Tarter, J. C., & Woolfolk, A. (2006). Academic optimism of schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1(4), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jaquith, A., & McLaughlin, M. (2010). A temporary, intermediary organization at the helm of regional education reform: Lessons from the Bay Area School Reform Collaborative. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, C. C., Kahle, J. B., & Fargo, J. D. (2006). A study of the effect of sustained, whole-school professional development on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 775–786.Google Scholar
  44. Keshavarz, N., Nutbeam, D., Rowling, L., & Khavarpour, F. (2010). Schools as social complex adaptive systems: A new way to understand the challenges of introducing the health promoting schools concept. Social Science and Medicine, 70(10), 1467–1474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ketter, J., & Lewis, C. (2001). Already reading texts and contexts: Multicultural literature in a predominantly white rural community. Theory into Practice, 40(3), 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klein, E. J. (2007). Rethinking professional development: Building a culture of teacher learning. The New Educator, 3(3), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104, 103–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Leithwood, K. (2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(3), 245–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Leithwood, K., Louis, K., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. New York: The Wallace Foundation.Google Scholar
  50. Lieberman, A. (1992). School-university collaborations: A view from the inside. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(2), 147–156.Google Scholar
  51. Lieberman, A. (2000). Networks as learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 221–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (Eds.). (1984). Teachers, their world, and their work: Implications for school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  53. Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (Eds.). (2001). Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  54. Liou, S. M. (2004). The effects of We the People & Project Citizen on the civic skills and dispositions of Taiwanese senior high school students. Journal of Taiwan Normal University: Education, 49(1), 63–90.Google Scholar
  55. Lohmeier, J. (2010, March). Evaluating the effects of faculty study groups on collaboration and school connectedness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American educational research association, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  56. Lomos, C., Hofman, R., & Bosker, R. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement—a meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 22(2), 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lortie, D. (2002). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mascall, B., & Leithwood, K. (2010). Investing in leadership: The district’s role in managing principal turnover. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. Washington, DC: Falmer.Google Scholar
  60. McGill-Franzen, A., Allington, R. L., & Brooks, G. (1999). Putting books in the classroom seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93(2), 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. (2006). Building school-based teacher learning communities: Professional strategies to improve student achievement. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mirón, L. F. (1996). The social construction of urban schooling: Situating the crisis. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  63. Mourshed, M., Chinezi, C., & Barber, M. (2010) How the world’s most improved systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey & Co. Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com.
  64. Murray, S., Ma, X., & Mazur, J. (2009). Effects of peer coaching on teachers’ collaborative interactions and students’ mathematics achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(3), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. National Writing Project. (2008). Research brief: Writing project professional development for teachers yields gains in student writing achievement. University of California at Berkeley. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/download/nwp_file/10683/NWP_Research_Brief_2008.pdf?x-r=pcfile_d.
  66. Nehring, J., & Szczesiul, S. (2011). International research findings in the field of educational improvement: A systematic review of the second international handbook of educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Meeting of the Belfast-Haifa-Lowell education research project. Israel: Haifa University.Google Scholar
  67. Neumann, S. B., & Cunningham, L. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instruction practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46(2), 532–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Newmann, F., & Associates. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  69. Nystrand, M. J., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research on the Teaching of English, 25, 261–290.Google Scholar
  70. Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M., & Dult, R. (2010). Improving science and mathematics instruction: The SINUS project as an example for reform as teacher professional development. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Porter, A., Garet, M., Desimone, L., Yoon, K., & Birman, B. (2000). Does professional development change teaching practice? Results from a three year study. Washington: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  72. Raudenbush, S. W. (1984). Magnitude of teacher expectancy effects on pupil IQ as a function of the credibility of expectancy induction: A synthesis of findings from 18 experiments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rousseau, C., & Tate, W. F. (2003). No time like the present: Reflecting on equity in school mathematics. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 210–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Saunders, W. M., Goldenberg, C. N., & Gallimore, R. (2009). Increasing achievement by focusing grade-level terms on improving classroom learning: A prospective, quasi-experimental study of title I schools. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1006–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Saxe, G. B., Gerhart, M., & Nasir, N. S. (2001). Enhancing students’ understanding of mathematics: A study of three contrasting approaches to professional support. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sirotnik, K. A., & Goodlad, J. I. (1988). School-University partnerships for educational renewal: Rationale and concepts. In K. A. Sirotnik & J. I. Goodlad (Eds.), School-University partnerships in action: Concepts, cases, and concerns, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
  77. Sizer, T. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  78. Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7(4), 221–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Timperley, H. S., & Parr, J. M. (2005). Theory competition and the process of change. Journal of Educational Change, 6(3), 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Trimble, S. (2002). Common elements of high performing, high poverty middle schools. Middle School Journal, 33(4), 7–16.Google Scholar
  81. Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effects of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.Google Scholar
  83. Yasumoto, J., Uekawa, K., & Bidwell, C. (2001). Collegial focus and high school students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 181–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Young, D. B., Dougherty, B., & Lai, M. K. (1998). Addressing equity through curriculum development and program evaluation. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4(2&3), 269–281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options