Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 431–447 | Cite as

‘We can only change in a small way’: A study of secondary English teachers’ implementation of curriculum reform in China

  • Chunmei Yan
Article

Abstract

This article reports on a study of English secondary teachers’ perceptions of and implementation of the new English curriculum reform in China. Triangulated data collection methods were employed to gather information about teachers’ perceptions of the new curriculum and their teaching behaviours. Implementation gap emerged between the new curriculum requirements and the teachers’ classroom practices despite the teachers’ common endorsement of the new curriculum goals and pedagogies due to a series of contextual constraints: the considerable professional and psychological challenges to teachers, the students’ resistance, and the lack of support school administrators and most importantly, the backwash effect of the prevalent examination culture. The study suggests the necessity to address teachers’ challenges and difficulties in the curriculum reform process to facilitate their implementation of the reform.

Keywords

The new curriculum reform China Secondary English teachers Implementation gap Contextual features Challenges and difficulties 

References

  1. Adams, R. S., & Chen, D. (1981). The process of educational innovation. London: Kogan Page Ltd.Google Scholar
  2. Adamson, B., Kwan, T., & Chan, K. K. (2000). Changing the curriculum: The impact of reform in primary schooling in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: HKU Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adamson, B., & Yin, A. T. S. (2008). Leadership and collaboration in implementing curriculum change in Hong Kong secondary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(2), 180–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Hamzi, S. (2003). EFL teacher preparation programmes in Saudi Arabia: Trends and challenge. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 341–345.Google Scholar
  5. Altinyelken, H. K. (2010). Curriculum change in Uganda: Teacher perspectives on the new thematic curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anley, V. (1993). Why research and development fail. In N. Bird & J. Harris (Eds.), Quilt and quill—Achieving and maintaining quality in language teaching and learning. Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Ball, S. J., & Bowe, R. (1992). Subject departments and the “implementation” of national curriculum policy: An overview of the issues. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barnard, B. D. (2009). Curricular innovation behind closed classroom doors: A Vietnamese case study. Prospect, 24(2), 20–33.Google Scholar
  11. Berry, R. S. Y. (2003). English language teaching and learning in mainland China: A comparison of the intentions of the English language curriculum reform and the real life teaching and learning situation in the English classroom. Hong Kong Institute of Education NAS Newsletter, 4, 3–6.Google Scholar
  12. Biggs, J. (1996). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Biggs, J., & Watkins, D. (Eds.). (1995). Classroom learning: Educational psychology for the Asian teacher. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Carson, T. R. (2009). Implementing the new curriculum in China: Rethinking curriculum change from the place of the teacher. Retrieved December 14, 2009 from http://www.ualberta.ca/~tcarson/WCS%20Carson%20(CANADA).doc.
  15. Chinese Ministry of Education. (2003). Education statistics 2003. Retrieved Oct 18, 2010 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/.
  16. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (Eds.). (1992). Doing qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Dello-Iacovo, B. (2009). Curriculum reform and ‘quality education’ in China: An overview. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fullan, M. (1991). The New meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fullan, M. (1999). Change forces: The sequel. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  21. Fullan, M., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn’t. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 744–752.Google Scholar
  22. Gahin, G. & Myhill, D. (2001). The communicative approach in Egypt: Exploring the secrets of the pyramids. TEFL Web Journal, 1–2. Retrieved on January 3 2008 from http://www.teflwebj.org/v1n2/Gahin_Myhill.html.
  23. Gamoran, A. (1997). Curriculum change as a reform strategy: Lessons from the United States and Scotland. Teacher College Record, 98(4), 608–628.Google Scholar
  24. Gitlin, A., & Margonis, F. (1995). The political aspect of reform: Teacher resistance as good sense. American Journal of Education, 103(4), 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guthrie, L., & Guthrie, G. (2002). The magnificent eight: AVID best practices study. Burlingame, CA: Center for Research, Evaluation, and Training in Education.Google Scholar
  26. Halstead, J. M., & Zhu, C. Y. (2009). Autonomy as an element in Chinese educational reform: A case study of English lessons in a senior high school in Beijing. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harris, J., Zhao, Y., & Caldwell, B. J. (2009). Global characteristics of school transformation in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Hovhannisyan, A., & Sahlberg, P. (2010). Cooperative learning for educational reform in Armenia. Intercultural Education, 21(3), 229–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoyle, E., & Wallace, M. (2007). Educational reform: An ironic perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1), 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu, G. W. (2005). ‘CLT is best for China’—an untenable absolutist claim. ELT Journal, 59(1), 65–68.Google Scholar
  32. Jiang, L. (2004). Senior secondary school teachers: Wandering in expectation. Contemporary Educational Science, 20, 17–20. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, R. K. (1989). A decision-making framework for the coherent language curriculum. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kennedy, C. (1987). Innovating for a change: Teacher development and innovation. ELT Journal, 41(3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kennedy, M. (2010). Against boldness. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Kırkgöz, Y. (2008a). Curriculum innovation in Turkish primary education Asia-Pacific. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 309–322.Google Scholar
  38. Kırkgöz, Y. (2008b). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, C. K., & Yin, H. B. (2011). Teachers’ emotions and professional identity in curriculum reform: A Chinese perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leithwood, K. (2002). Organizational conditions to support teaching and learning. In W. Hawley & D. Rollie (Eds.), The keys to effective schools (pp. 97–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  41. Li, Q. (1994). Cultural clashes: A study of misunderstandings and frustrations between foreign teachers and Chinese students in EFL classes in China. Unpublished master’s thesis. Azusa, California: Azusa Pacific University.Google Scholar
  42. Liu, M. H. (2009). Exploring the impact of EFL teacher professional development on student learning experience in context. The International Journal of Learning, 16(10), 521–536.Google Scholar
  43. Lo, Y. C. (2005). Curriculum reform. In M. Bray & R. Koo (Eds.) Education and society in Hong Kong and Macao: Comparative perspectives on continuity and change. 7(4), 161–174.Google Scholar
  44. Maley, A. (1990). Xanadu—a miracle of rare device: the teaching of English in China. In Y. F. Dzau (Ed.), English in China (pp. 95–105). Hong Kong: API Press.Google Scholar
  45. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (Eds.). (1995). Designing qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. McDonald, B. (1991). Introduction. In J. Rudduck (Ed.), Innovation and change (pp. 1–7). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  47. McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(2), 171–178.Google Scholar
  48. Meirink, J. A., Imants, J., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2010). Teacher learning and collaboration in innovative teams. Cambridge Journal of Education, 40(2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (Eds.). (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  50. Moreno, J. (2007). Do the initial and the continuous teachers’ professional development sufficiently prepare teachers to understand and cope with the complexities of today and tomorrow’s education? Journal of Educational Change, 8, 169–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Orafi, S. M. S., & Borg, S. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37(2), 243–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Penunel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. (2011). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in earth systems science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48(4), 996–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prapaisit de Segovia, L., & Hardison, D. M. (2009). Implementing education reform: EFL teachers’ perspectives. ELT Journal, 63(2), 154–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Priestley, M. (2010). Curriculum for excellence: transformational change or business as usual? Scottish Educational Review, 42(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  56. Prophet, R. (1995). Views from the Botswana junior secondary school classroom: Case study of a curriculum intervention. International Journal of Educational Development, 15(2), 127–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rhem, J. (1995). Deep/surface approaches to learning: An Introduction. The National Teaching and Learning Forum. 5(1). Retrieved December 28, 2009 from http://www.ntlf.com/html/pi/9512/download.pdf.
  58. Rulcker, T. (1991). Curriculum reform. In A. Lewy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of curriculum. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  59. Ryan, J., Kang, C. Y., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). China’s basic education reform: An account of an international collaborative research and development project. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sahlberg, P. (2006). Models of curriculum development. International trends and the way forward. In P. Sahlberg (Ed.), Curriculum reform and implementation in the 21st century: policies, perspectives and implementation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Curriculum Reform and Implementation (pp. 108–121). Ankara: Ministry of National Education.Google Scholar
  61. Sakui, K. (2004). Wearing two pairs of shoes: Language teaching in Japan. English Language Teaching Journal, 58(2), 155–163.Google Scholar
  62. Sargent, C., Houghton, E., & White, E. (2011). Thematic probe: Curriculum specification in seven countries. April 2011. Slough: NFER.Google Scholar
  63. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 217–285). Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  64. Su, Y. C. (2007). Students’ changing views and the integrated-skills approach in Taiwan’s EFL college classes. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Supovitz, J., & Weinbaum, E. (2008). The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tang, D., & Absalom, D. (1998). Teaching across cultures: considerations for western EFL teachers in China. Teaching Across Cultures, 3(2), 117–132.Google Scholar
  67. Thomson, P., & Sanders, E. (2010). Creativity and whole school change: An investigation of English head teacher practices. Journal of Educational Change, 11(1), 63–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tomlinson, B., & Bao, D. (2004). The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to EFL methodology. Language Teaching Research, 8(2), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tong, S. Y. A. (2010). Lessons learned? School leadership and curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Troudi, S., & Alwan, F. (2010). Teachers’ feelings during curriculum change in the United Arab Emirates: Opening pandora’s box. Teacher Development, 14(1), 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tsui, A. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language teaching. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. van Veen, K., & Sleegers, P. (2006). How does it feel? Teachers’ emotions in a context of change. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(1), 85–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2000). One size fits all? Teacher appraisal in a Chinese culture. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wang, W. F., & Lam, A. S. L. (2009). The English language curriculum for senior secondary school in China: Its evolution from 1949. RELC Journal, 40(1), 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Waters, A., & Vilches, M. L. C. (2005). Managing innovation in language education: A course for ELT change agents. RELC Journal, 36(2), 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waters, A., & Vilches, M. L. C. (2008). Factors affecting ELT reforms: The case of the philippines basic education curriculum. RELC Journal, 39(5), 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wedell, M. (2003). Giving TESOL change a chance: Supporting key players in the curriculum change process. System, 31(3), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wedell, M. (2004). TESOL initial teacher training and TESOL curriculum goals: Making the connection. Keynote paper at the Seminar on Initial Education for Teachers of English: What can be learned from the International experience?. Google Scholar
  79. Wedell, M. (2005). Cascading training down into the classroom: The need for parallel planning. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(6), 637–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yeung, S. Y. S. (2009). Is student-centred pedagogy impossible in Hong Kong? The case of inquiry in classrooms. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10, 377–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yeung, S. Y. S., & Lam, C. C. (2006). The malfunctioning of the curriculum policy-making system in Hong Kong: A case study of curriculum integration. International Journal of Educational Reform, 15(3), 400–423.Google Scholar
  82. Yu, Y. F., & Wang, B. (2009). A study of language learning strategy use in the context of EFL curriculum and pedagogy reform in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Foreign LanguagesCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations