Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 12, Issue 4, pp 441–456 | Cite as

One newspaper’s role in the demise of the Tasmanian Essential Learnings Curriculum: Adding new understandings to Cohen’s moral panic theory in analyzing curriculum change

  • Grant Rodwell
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of print media in the development of systemwide curriculum change. Consideration is given to the nature and influence of newspapers on public opinion about curriculum change through the examination of the role of the Mercury in one period in the history of Tasmanian curriculum change. The application of Cohen’s (Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers (3rd ed.), London: Routledge, 2002) work on moral panics in influencing public opinion is utilized as a theoretical framework.

Keywords

Curriculum change History of curriculum change Media and curriculum change Constructivist curriculum Media and educational policy 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, G. L. (2007). The media’s impact on educational policies and practices: Political spectacle and social control. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(1), 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Association of Reading Teachers. (2006). Newsletter: Special edition (No. 3). Retrieved from http://www.alea.edu.au.
  3. Baker, M. (1994). Media coverage in education. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42(3), 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, A., & Garrett, P. (Eds.). (1998). Approaches to media discourse. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Berlach, R. G., & O’Neill, M. (2008). Western Australia’s ‘English’ course of study: To OBE or not to OBE, perhaps that is the question. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  6. British Council. (n.d.) UK education systems. Retrieved from http://www.britishcouncil.org/usa-education-uk-system-k-12-curriculum-england.htm.
  7. Brown, D. (2008, November 23). Population milestone. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  8. Cassidy, S. (2008, April 18). ‘Moral panic’ and ‘policy hysteria’ harming primary schools, report says. The Independent. Retrieved from http://www.independent.co.uk.
  9. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cunningham, P. (1992). Teachers’ professional image and the press, 1950–1990. History of Education, 21(1), 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnelly, K., Stephens, M., Redman, C., & Hempenstall, K. (2005). Benchmarking Australian primary school curricula. Canberra ACT: Commonwealth of Australia, Department of Education, Science and Training.Google Scholar
  12. Dowden, T. (2007). Relevant, challenging, integrative and exploratory curriculum design: Perspectives from theory and practice for middle level schooling in Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncan, P. (2006, April 27). Parents push for ‘proper reports.’ The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  14. Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Eldridge, J., Kitzinger, J., & Williams, K. (1997). The mass media and power in modern Britain. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, J. (2005). Essential learnings. Victoria, Australia: Australian Education Union. Retrieved from http://www.aeuvic.asn.au.
  18. Haas, E. (2007). False equivalency: Think tank references on education in the news media. Peabody Journal of Education, 82(1), 63–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Henchey, N. (1999). The new curriculum reform: What does it really mean? McGill Journal of Education, 34(3), 227–242.Google Scholar
  20. Lingard, B., & Rawolle, S. (2004). Mediatizing educational policy: The journalistic field, science policy, and cross-field effects. Journal of Education Policy, 19(3), 361–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Low Choy, H. (2005a, September 29). Bottom of the class. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  22. Low Choy, H. (2005b, September 13). Business hits ELs reports: Makes no sense, say employers. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  23. Low Choy, H. (2005c, September 8). Dud decoder of courses jargon. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  24. Low Choy, H. (2005d, September 12). ‘ELs rubbish,’ say teachers: Students now learning less. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  25. Lugg, C. A. (2000). Educational policy in a media-driven age: The rise of PRolicy. Journal of School Leadership, 10(6), 505–524.Google Scholar
  26. Macintyre, S. (2007, March 7). Polemics fails its own test. The Australian. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au.
  27. McRobbie, A., & Thornton, S. L. (1995). Rethinking ‘moral panic’ for multi-mediated social worlds. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mulford, B., & Edmunds, B. (2010). Educational investment in Australian schooling: Serving public purposes in Tasmanian primary schools. Launceston, Tasmania: University of Tasmania, Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
  29. Paine, M. (2005, September 28). Essential learnings debate turns spiritual. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  30. Quebec restores percentage grades on report cards. (2007, June 1). CBC News. Retrieved from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/montreal/story/2007/06/01/qc-curriculumreform0601.html.
  31. Rodwell, G. (1992). With zealous efficiency: Progressivism and Tasmanian state primary education, 1900–20. Darwin, Australia: William Michael Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rodwell, G. (2009a). “Death by a thousand cuts”: A history of the Tasmanian essential learnings curriculum, 2000–2006 (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Tasmania, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Rodwell, G. (2009b). “Death by a thousand cuts”: The failings of the Tasmanian essential learnings curriculum, 2000–2006. The political dynamics. Education Research and Perspectives, 36(2), 110–134.Google Scholar
  34. Rodwell, G. (2010). The Tasmanian essential learnings curriculum, 2000–06: Some aspects of the ecology policy metaphor in analyzing a failed statewide curriculum innovation. Curriculum Perspectives, 29(2), 40–52.Google Scholar
  35. Rounds, H. (2002). Reform journalism, exposés, and crusading. In W. D. Sloan & L. M. Parcell (Eds.), American journalism: History, principles and practices (pp. 219–228). Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.Google Scholar
  36. Roy Morgan Research. (2008). Roy Morgan readership estimates for Australia for the 12 months to March 2008 (Article No. 753). Retrieved from http://www.roymorgan.com/news/press-releases/2008/753/.
  37. Tasmania Department of Education. (2003). Literacy and numeracy plan, 2003–2005. Hobart, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://catalogue.statelibrary.tas.gov.au/item/?q=Literacy+Numeracy+Plan+for+Schools&i=1&id=817226.
  38. Thomas, S. (2006). Education policy in the media: Public discourses on education. Brisbane, Australia: PostPressed.Google Scholar
  39. Thomson, P. (2004). Introduction. Journal of Educational Policy, 13(3), 251–530.Google Scholar
  40. Warburton, A. (2006a, June 17). Illiteracy, chapter and verse. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.
  41. Warburton, A. (2006b, June 10). Satire hits the target. The Mercury. Retrieved from http://www.themercury.com.au.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options