Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 221–239 | Cite as

Talkin’ bout my generation: Boomers, Xers, and educational change

  • Corrie Stone-Johnson
Article
First Online:

Abstract

From 1998 to 2003, Andy Hargreaves and Ivor Goodson, along with colleagues Shawn Moore, Sonia James-Wilson, Dean Fink, and Corrie Giles, undertook a large-scale study of eight secondary schools in Ontario, Canada, and New York in the United States to investigate teachers’ perceptions and experiences of educational change over 30 years spanning from the 1970s through the 1990s (Hargreaves and Goodson in Edu Admn Quart 42(1):3–41, 2006). The Change Over Time? study not only provided a unique glimpse into how schools and teachers experience educational change but also demonstrated that most of what educators and scholars previously considered when looking at educational change neglected its political, historical, and longitudinal aspects. Hargreaves and Goodson highlighted five change forces that shape educational change: waves of reform, changing student demographics, teacher generations, leadership succession, and school interrelations. This article, based on work conducted in Massachusetts from 2007 to 2009 (Stone-Johnson in Enduring reform: The impact of mandated change on middle career teachers. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, 2009; Teachers’ career trajectories and work lives. Springer, Dordrecht, 2009), elaborates upon two of these aspects, waves of reform and teacher generations, highlighting the response of the current generation of teachers in mid-career to the most recent wave of reform.

Keywords

Educational change Capacity Commitment Generations Standardization 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anthony, P. G., & Rossman, G. B. (1994). The Massachusetts Education Reform Act: What is it and will it work? Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED 377559).Google Scholar
  2. Barber, M. (2004). The virtue of accountability: System redesign, inspection, and incentives in the era of informed professionalism. Journal of Education, 185(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  3. Booher-Jennings, J. (2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(10), 756–761.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, W., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 597–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Day, C. (2008). Committed for life? Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. Journal of Educational Change, 9(3), 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drake, C. (2002). Experience counts: Career stage and teachers’ responses to mathematics education reform. Educational Policy, 16(2), 311–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2002). Generations, culture and society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eisenstadt, S. (1956). From generation to generation. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, B. H. (1979). Some problems of inference from chain data. Sociological Methodology, 10, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodson, I. F., Moore, S., & Hargreaves, A. (2006). Teacher nostalgia and the sustainability of reform: The generation and degeneration of teachers’ missions, memory, and meaning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 42–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. N. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99, 45–56.Google Scholar
  14. Gtazek, S. D., & Sarason, S. B. (2007). Productive learning: Science, art, and Einstein’s relativity in educational reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hargreaves, A., & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and non sustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2007). The coming age of post-standardization. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org.
  19. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2008). Beyond standardization: Powerful new principles for improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(2), 135–143.Google Scholar
  20. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  21. Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (2010). Second international handbook of educational change (Vol. 23). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 31–57.Google Scholar
  24. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Little, J. W. (1996). The emotional contours and career trajectories of (disappointed) reform enthusiasts. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mannheim, K. (1970). The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic Review, 57(3), 378–404.Google Scholar
  29. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2002). Elementary and Secondary Education Act: No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/nclb/news02/guide.pdf.
  30. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2009). Spring 2009 MCAS tests: Summary of state results. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/mcas/2009/results/summary.pdf.
  31. McNeil, L. M. (2000). Contradictions of school reform: Educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Merser, C. (1987). “Grown-ups”: A generation in search of adulthood. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2005). Attracting, developing and retaining effective Teachers. Final report: teachers matter. Paris: Author.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ravitch, D. (1995). National standards in American education: A citizen’s guide. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  36. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. Philadelphia: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  37. Sheehy, G. (1974). Passages: Predictable crises of adult life. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  38. Sikes, P., Measor, L., & Woods, P. (1985). Teacher careers: Crises and continuities. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  39. Spillane, J. P. (1999). External reform initiatives and teachers’ efforts to reconstruct their practice: The mediating role of teachers’ zones of enactment. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(2), 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stone-Johnson, C. (2009a). Enduring reform: The impact of mandated change on middle career teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.Google Scholar
  41. Stone-Johnson, C. (2009b). Regenerating teachers. In S. Rolls & H. Plauborg (Eds.), Teachers’ career trajectories and work lives (pp. 179–202). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584–2069. New York: William and Morrow Company.Google Scholar
  44. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1997). The fourth turning: What cycles of history tell us about America’s next rendezvous with destiny. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  45. Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  46. Watters, E. (2004). Urban tribes: Are friends the new family? New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  47. Zemke, R., Raines, C., & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work: Managing the clash of Veterans, Boomers, Xers and Nexters in your workplace. New York: AMACOM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational Leadership and PolicyUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options