Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 173–185 | Cite as

The Fourth Way of Finland



Globalization has increased mobility of people, resources, and ideas. It is also affecting how governments think about education and what schools teach to their students. Attributes related to education for a knowledge society, sustainable development, or 21st century skills are parts of current national educational policies and reforms. A powerful pretext for global educational reform thinking is current international student assessments. As a consequence, particular educational reform orthodoxy has emerged that relies on a set of basic assumptions in order to improve the quality of education and fix other educational deficiencies. This article describes the beginning of the present global educational reform movement discussing some of its key characteristics and implications in practice. Although overlooked by many policy analysts, Finland represents a striking and highly successful alternative to this global educational reform movement. The scholarly work of Andy Hargreaves is seen as essential in understanding the requirements and resources that are needed in securing good public education for all in the future.


Educational change Educational reform Educational policy Globalization 


  1. Au, W. (2009). Unequal by design: High-stakes testing and the standardization of inequality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Center on Education Policy. (2006). From the capital to the classroom: Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., Moore, S., & Manning, S. (2001). Learning to change: Teaching beyond subjects and standards. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Hargreaves, A., Halász, G., & Pont, B. (2008). The Finnish approach to system leadership. In B. Pont, D. Nusche, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Improving school leadership: Case studies on system leadership (Vol. 2, pp. 69–109). Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (2010). Second international handbook of educational change. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2006). Data-driven to distraction: Why American educators need a reform alternative and where they might look to find it. Education Week, 26(4), 32–33.Google Scholar
  9. Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future of educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.Google Scholar
  10. Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2008). Learning about system renewal. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 36(2), 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. MacDonald, E., & Shirley, D. (2009). The mindful teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C., & Barber, M. (2010). How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better. London: McKinsey.Google Scholar
  13. Nichols, S., & Berliner, D. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  14. OECD. (2010). 2009 PISA results. What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). Paris: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Popham, J. (2007). The no-win accountability game. In C. Glickman (Ed.), Letters to the next president: What we can do about the real crisis in public education (pp. 166–173). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ravitch, D. (2010). The death of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Sahlberg, P. (2010, December 27). Learning from Finland: How one of the world’s top educational performers turned around. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from
  18. Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Springer, M. G. (2009). Performance incentives: Their growing impact on American K-12 education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for International Mobility and Cooperation (CIMO)HelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations