Schools, teachers, and curriculum change: A balancing act?
- 2.2k Downloads
Educational change is a fact of life for teachers across the world, as schools are subjected to constant and ubiquitous pressures to innovate. And, yet, many school practices remain remarkably persistent in the face of such innovation. This paradox of innovation without change is perplexing for policymakers and practitioners alike. This paper investigates the gap between policy and practice, between innovation and the changes in social practices that occur in response to such innovation. It draws upon empirical data from two case studies in Scotland—schools responding to new curriculum policy—exploring contrasting approaches to the management of innovation. One is a laissez faire approach, and the other a more directive managerial strategy. Through an analytical separation of culture, structure, and agency, derived from the social theory of Margaret Archer, the paper sheds light on the social processes that accompanied innovation in these two settings demonstrating how teacher culture and differing management styles impact upon externally initiated policy.
KeywordsAgency Change Culture Curriculum Innovation Interdisciplinary Structure
I wish to offer my thanks to Professor Julie Allan for her continued interest in this work and for her valuable insights about the paper.
- Archer, M. (1988). Culture and agency: The place of culture in social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Balkin, J. M. (1998). Cultural software: A theory of ideology. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explanations in policy sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ball, S. J. (2008). The education debate. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of a democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Benavot, A. (2004). A global study of intended instructional time and official school curricula, 1980–2000. Retrieved from UNESCO website: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001466/146625e.pdf.
- Biesta, G. J. J., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149.Google Scholar
- Blase, J. (1998). The micropolitics of educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), The international handbook of educational change: Part one (pp. 544–557). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bowe, R., Ball, S., & Gold, A. (1992). Reforming education and changing schools: Case studies in policy sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Boyd, B. (1997). The statutory years of secondary education: Change and progress. In M. M. Clark & P. Munn (Eds.), Education in Scotland: Policy and practice from pre-school to secondary (pp. 52–66). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (1984). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890–1980. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85–105). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.Google Scholar
- Cuban, L. (1998). How schools change reforms: Redefining reform success and failure. Teachers College Record, 99(3), 453–477.Google Scholar
- Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
- Fogarty, R. (1991). Ten ways to integrate curriculum. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 61–65.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gleeson, D., & Whitty, G. (1976). Developments in social studies teaching. London: Open Books.Google Scholar
- Goodson, I. F. (2003). Professional knowledge, professional lives: Studies in education and teaching. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, A. (1994). Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the post-modern age. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Hargreaves, D. (1982). The challenge for the comprehensive school: Culture, curriculum and community. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Helsby, G. (1999). Changing teachers’ work. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education. (1992). Effective learning and teaching in Scottish secondary schools: Modern studies. Retrieved from http://www.hmie.gov.uk/documents/publication/elms.htm.
- Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education. (1999). Standards and quality in secondary schools 1995–99: Modern studies. Retrieved from http://www.hmie.gov.uk/documents/publication/sqms.html.
- Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education. (2000). Achieving success: A report on the review of provision in S1/S2 by HM Inspectors of Schools. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/education/as12-00.asp.
- Hill, B. (1994). Teaching secondary social studies in a multicultural society. Melbourne, AU: Longman Cheshire.Google Scholar
- King, L. (1986). The story of a syllabus. In D. Holly (Ed.), Humanism in adversity: Teachers’ experience of integrated humanities in the 1980s (pp. 39–53). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Lang, M., Day, C., Bunder, W., Hansen, H., Kysilka, M. L., Tilllema, H., et al. (1999). Teacher professional development in the context of curriculum reform. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen, & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 121–132). Louvain, BE: Garant.Google Scholar
- Learning and Teaching Scotland. (2000). Environmental studies: Society, science and technology. 5–14 Guidelines. Glasgow, UK: Author.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Menter, I. (2007). Keynote address presented at the annual seminar of the Partnership for Professional Enquiry. Stirling, UK: University of Stirling.Google Scholar
- Osborn, M., Croll, P., Broadfoot, P., Pollard, A., McNess, E., & Triggs, P. (1997). Policy into practice and practice into policy: Creative mediation in the primary classroom. In G. Helsby & G. McCulloch (Eds.), Teachers and the national curriculum (pp. 52–65). London: Cassell.Google Scholar
- Reeves, J. (2008). Between a rock and a hard place? Curriculum for excellence and the quality initiative in Scottish schools. Scottish Educational Review, 40(2), 6–16.Google Scholar
- Ross, A. (1995). The rise and fall of the social subjects in the curriculum. In J. Ahier & A. Ross (Eds.), The social subjects within the curriculum: Children’s social learning in the national curriculum (pp. 53–78). London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. Oxford, UK: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Scottish Education Department. (1965). Primary education in Scotland. Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Scottish Education Department. (1977). The structure of the curriculum in the third and fourth years of the Scottish secondary school. Edinburgh, UK: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Scottish Executive Education Department (2001). A teaching profession for the 21st century. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/library3/education/tp21a-00.asp.
- Scottish Executive Education Department. (2006). A curriculum for excellence: Progress and proposals. Edinburgh, UK: Author.Google Scholar
- Siskin, L. S. (1994). Realms of knowledge: Academic departments in secondary schools. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Skilbeck, M. (1998). School-based curriculum development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), The international handbook of educational change: Part one (pp. 121–144). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–40). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Supovitz, J. A. (2008). Implementation as iterative refraction. In J. A. Supovitz & E. H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools (pp. 151–172). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Torrance, H. (1997). Assessment, accountability, and standards: Using assessment to control the reform of schooling. In A. H. Halsey, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, society (pp. 320–331). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Wesley, E. B., & Wronski, S. P. (1973). Teaching secondary social studies in a world society. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Company.Google Scholar
- Whitty, G. (1992). Lessons from radical curriculum initiatives: Integrated humanities and world studies. In A. Rattansi & D. Reeder (Eds.), Rethinking radical education: Essays in honour of Brian Simon (pp. 96–117). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
- Wubbels, T., & Poppleton, P. (1999). Knowledge about change and its effects on teachers. In M. Lang, J. Olson, H. Hansen, & W. Bunder (Eds.), Changing schools/changing practices: Perspectives on educational reform and teacher professionalism (pp. 149–156). Louvain, BE: Garant.Google Scholar