Advertisement

Journal of Educational Change

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 403–424 | Cite as

Leadership for change in the educational wild west of post-Katrina New Orleans

  • Brian R. Beabout
Article

Abstract

This study examines the perceptions of public school principals in New Orleans, Louisiana during the period of extensive decentralization in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Using the frameworks of systems theory and chaos/complexity theories, iterative interviews with 10 school principals form the core data which examines leaders’ experiences in an increasingly market-oriented urban school system. The following themes emerged during constant comparative analysis: (1) the omnipresence of storm recovery in principals’ lives, (2) the lingering presence of the pre-Katrina school system, and (3) the emerging inequalities of the post-Katrina system. The analysis also identifies several broader system change concepts including: the strange attractor of inequality, differential perturbance, requisite stability, and a need for system leadership to counteract inequality.

Keywords

Chaos theory Complexity theory Qualitative methods School choice System leadership Urban schools 

References

  1. Anderson, E. (2005, October 13). State report on N.O. schools. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education and archived at http://fs.uno.edu/bbeabout/10_13_05.htm.
  2. Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  3. Banathy, B. H. (1996). Designing social systems in a changing world. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, J. M., Sadovnik, A. R., & Visconti, L. (2006). Charter schools and urban education improvement: A comparison of Newark’s district and charter schools. The Urban Review, 38(4), 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beabout, B. (2008). Principals’ perceptions of school leadership in post-Katrina New Orleans (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Penn State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  6. Beabout, B. R., Carr-Chellman, A. A., Alkandari, K. A., Almeida, L. C., Gursoy, H. T., Ma, Z., et al. (2008). The perceptions of New Orleans educators on the process of rebuilding the New Orleans school system after Katrina. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13(2/3), 212–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1975). Federal programs supporting educational change: Vol. 1. A model of educational change. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  8. Briggs, J., & Peat, F. D. (1999). Turbulent mirror: An illustrated guide to chaos theory and the science of wholeness. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997). The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carr, A. A. (1997). User design in the creation of human learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carr, S. (2008, February 25). Mother creates alternative to public schools. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com.
  12. Carr, S. (2009, September 11). National charter advocate says he’s opposed to selective admissions during talk in New Orleans. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com.
  13. Carr, S. (2010a, March 7). New Orleans charter schools work to sustain teachers’ energy, results. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com.
  14. Carr, S. (2010b, April 1). Public school pre-k slots get more costly, hard to come by. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com.
  15. Carr-Chellman, A. A. (1998). Systemic change: Critically reviewing the literature. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(4), 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2000). The new sciences and systemic change in education. Educational Technology, 40(1), 28–37.Google Scholar
  17. Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1988). Politics, markets, and the organization of schools. The American Political Science Review, 82(4), 1065–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1890–1990 (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Cuban, L., & Usdan, M. (2002). Powerful reforms with shallow roots: Improving America’s urban schools. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davies, L. (2004). Education and conflict: Complexity and chaos. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  21. Doll, W. E. (2008). Complexity and the culture of curriculum. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(1), 190–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Drucker, P. (1980). Managing in turbulent times. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  23. Dunn, K. (Writer). (2006). High school students return to New Orleans—alone [Radio]. In B. Gordemer (Producer), Morning Edition. USA: National Public Radio.Google Scholar
  24. Evans, R. (1996). The human side of school change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Fink, D. (2003). The law of unintended consequences: The ‘real’ cost of top-down reform. Journal of Educational Change, 4(2), 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  27. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  28. Gallaher, Jr., A. (1979). Directed change in formal organizations: The school system. In R. Barnhardt, J. H. Chilcott, & H. F. Wolcott (Eds.), Anthropology and educational administration (pp. 289–304). Tucson, AZ: Impresora Sahuaro.Google Scholar
  29. Goldenberg, C. N. (2004). Successful school change: Creating settings to improve teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gross, S. J. (1998). Staying centered: Curriculum leadership in turbulent times. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  31. Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2006). The ripple effect. Educational Leadership, 63(8), 16–20.Google Scholar
  32. Heckscher, C., & Donnellon, A. (1994). The post-bureaucratic organizations: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Hickock, E., & Andres, G. (2005, October 5). ‘New’ New Orleans, ‘new’ schools. The Washington Times. Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com.
  34. Hopkins, D. (2007). Sustaining leaders for system change. In B. Davies (Ed.), Developing sustainable leadership (pp. 154–174). Thousand Oaks, CA: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Hutchins, C. L. (1996). Systemic thinking: Solving complex problems. Aurora, CO: Professional Development Systems.Google Scholar
  36. Inskeep, S. (Writer). (2005). Katrina to change face of New Orleans schools [Radio]. In B. Gordemer (Producer), Morning Edition. USA: National Public Radio.Google Scholar
  37. Johnson, A. M. (1998). A response to restructuring: The dilemmas of school principals in a process of change. The Urban Review, 30(4), 309–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Joseph, R., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2005). Formative research on an early stage of the systemic change process in a small school district. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 937–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Katz, M. B. (1975). Class, bureaucracy, and schools: The illusion of educational change in America (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  40. Kiel, L. D., & Elliot, E. (1996). Chaos theory in the social sciences. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kozol, J. (1975). The night is dark and I am far from home. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  42. Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  43. Levin, H. M. (Ed.). (1999). Educational privatization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  44. Louisiana Department of Education. (2006). 20042005 Summary press report. Retrieved from http://www.doe.state.la.us/lde/uploads/8102pa.xls.
  45. Louisiana Department of Education. (2007). 20052007 School report cards and accountability reports. Retrieved from http://www.doe.state.la.us/lde/saa/2612.asp.
  46. Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 395–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lubienski, C., Gulosino, C., & Weitzel, P. (2009). School choice and competitive incentives: Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education, 115(4), 601–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maxcy, S. J. (1995). Democracy, chaos, and the new school order. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  49. McLaughlin, M. (1990). The rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11–16.Google Scholar
  50. McLaughlin, M. W., & Mitra, D. (2001). Theory-based change and change-based theory: Going deeper, going broader. Journal of Educational Change, 2(4), 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McQuillan, P. J. (2008). Small-school reform through the lens of complexity theory: It’s “good to think with”. Teachers College Record, 110(9), 1772–1801.Google Scholar
  52. Milstein, M. M. (Ed.). (1980). Schools, conflict, and change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  53. Morrison, K. (2002). School leadership and complexity theory. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  54. Mulford, B. (2005). Organizational learning and educational change. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Extending educational change (pp. 336–361). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muncey, D. E., & McQuillan, P. J. (1996). Reform and resistance in schools and classrooms: An ethnographic view of the Coalition of Essential Schools. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  56. The New Orleans parents’ guide to public schools. (2009). New Orleans, LA: New Orleans Parent Organizing Network.Google Scholar
  57. Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Oplatka, I. (2003). School change and self-renewal: Some reflections from life stories of women principals. Journal of Educational Change, 4(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Oplatka, I., Foskett, N., & Hemsley-Brown, J. (2002). Educational marketisation and the head’s psychological well-being: A speculative conceptualization. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Orfield, M. (2002). American metropolitics: The new suburban reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  61. Orr, M. T., Byrne-Jimenez, M., McFarlane, P., & Brown, B. (2005). Leading out from low performing schools: The urban principal experience. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(1), 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peat, F. D. (2008). Gentle action: Bringing creative change to a turbulent world. Pari, Italy: Pari Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Peck, K. L., & Carr, A. A. (1997). Restoring public confidence in schools through systems thinking. International Journal of Educational Reform, 6(3), 316–323.Google Scholar
  64. Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Boulder, CO: New Science Library.Google Scholar
  65. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reform. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  66. Reigeluth, C. M. (2004, April). Chaos theory and the sciences of complexity: Foundations for transforming education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  67. Riley, K. A. (2004, April). Leading challenging urban schools: Demands, dilemmas & dreams. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  68. Ritea, S. (2006, September 28). Suit targets school bussing. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education and archived at http://fs.uno.edu/bbeabout/tp_9_28_06c.htm.
  69. Ritea, S. (2007a, April 30). Left behind? Some accuse New Orleans’ east bank charter schools of turning away students with special needs. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com.
  70. Ritea, S. (2007b, January 26). N.O. district fails to meet goals for qualified teachers. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education and archived at http://fs.uno.edu/bbeabout/tp_1_26_07.htm.
  71. Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  72. Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. School by school enrollments. (2006, September 21). The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education and archived at http://fs.uno.edu/bbeabout/sept_21_enroll.jpg.
  74. Schooling the poor. (2006, November 26). The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education and archived at http://fs.uno.edu/bbeabout/schoolingthepoor.pdf.
  75. Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  76. Simon, D. (2007, August 1). Charter schools lead way on LEAP. The Times-Picayune. Retrieved from http://www.nola.com/education.
  77. Spindler, G. D. (1979). The role of the school administrator. In R. Barnhardt, J. H. Chilcott, & H. F. Wolcott (Eds.), Anthropology and educational administration (pp. 3–28). Tucson, AZ: Impresora Sahuaro.Google Scholar
  78. The state of public education in New Orleans: 2010 Report. (2010). New Orleans, LA: Tulane University, Cowen Institute for Public Education Initiatives.Google Scholar
  79. Stein, M. K., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2004). Reform ideas the travel far afield: The two cultures of reform in New York City’s District #2 and San Diego. Journal of Educational Change, 5(2), 161–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tuzzolo, E., & Hewitt, D. T. (2007). Rebuilding inequity: The re-emergence of the school-to prison pipeline in New Orleans. The High School Journal, 90(2), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering towards utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Tye, B. B. (2000). Hard truths: Uncovering the deep structure of schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  83. van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy (2nd ed.). London, ON: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  84. Viadero, D. (2007). Long after Katrina, children show symptoms of psychological distress. Education Week, 26(32), 7.Google Scholar
  85. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (A. H. Henderson & T. Parsons, Trans.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Weems, C. F., Taylor, L. K., Cannon, M. F., Marino, R. C., Romano, D. M., Scott, B. G., et al. (2009). Post traumatic stress, context, and the lingering effects of the Hurricane Katrina disaster among ethnic minority youth. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(1), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wheatley, M. J. (1999). Leadership and the new science: Discovering order in a chaotic world (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.Google Scholar
  88. Wolcott, H. (1973). The man in the principal’s office: An ethnography. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.348-H Bicentennial Education CenterThe University of New OrleansNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations