Abstract
This article introduces an empirical analysis of the potentials and contradictions of a narrative playworld intervention aimed at changing the pedagogical practices of a Finnish mixed-age elementary school classroom in spring 2004. In the playworld, students and teachers explore different phenomena by taking on the roles of characters from a story and acting inside the frames of an improvised plot. The analysis is based on an understanding of school as a historically and culturally formed activity system. The playworld, on the other hand, is understood as a collective imagined and materialized figured world. The findings show that for the teachers, the main contradiction in the playworld was between keeping control and promoting student initiatives. For the students, the contradiction arose between the student role and that of agent in the playworld. However, the contradictions also created the main developmental potentials of the activity. That the playworld was not only a tool for transforming classroom work but a world in which to belong made it possible to sustain the activity and make it a regular part of classroom practices.
Keywords
Activity theory Classroom interaction Figured world School developmentReferences
- Brorström, S. (1999). Drama games with 6-year-old children: Possibilities and limitations. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 250–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- El’konin, B. D., Vygotsky, L. S., & El’konin, D. B. (2001). Symbolic mediation and joint action. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 39(4), 9–20.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (1998). Reorganizing the motivational sphere of classroom culture: An activity-theoretical analysis of planning in a teacher team. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of mathematics classroom (pp. 76–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Engeström, Y. (2006). Development, movement and agency: Breaking away into mycorrhizae activities. In K. Yamasumi (Ed.), Building activity theory in practice: Toward next generation (pp. 1–43). Kansai University: Center for Human Activity Theory.Google Scholar
- Hakkarainen, P. (2006). Learning and development in play. In J. Einarsdottir & J. T. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education: Philosophy, research, policy and practice in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (pp. 183–222). Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Jr, Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Jurow, A. S. (2005). Shifting engagements in figured worlds: Middle school mathematics students’ participation in an architectural design project. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 35–67. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1401_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kennedy, D. (2006). The well of being. Childhood, subjectivity and education. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Lindqvist, G. (1995). The aesthetics of play. A didactic study of play and culture in preschools. Stockholm: Gotab.Google Scholar
- McNeil, L. M. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Meshcheryakov, A. (1979). Awakening to life: Forming behaviour and the mind in deaf-blind children. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
- Rainio, A. P. (2008). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in a playworld activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(2), 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sannino, A. (2008). Sustaining a non-dominant activity in school: Only a utopia? Journal of Educational Change, 9(4).Google Scholar
- Sarason, S. B. (1996). Revisiting “The culture of the school and the problem of change”. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Zellermayer, M. (2001). Resistance as a catalyst in teachers’ professional development. In M. C. Clark (Ed.), Talking shop. Authentic conversation and teacher learning (pp. 40–63). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar