Journal of Electroceramics

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 73–80 | Cite as

The effect of growth atmosphere and Ir contamination on electric properties of La3Ta0.5Ga5.5O14 single crystal grown by the floating zone and Czochralski method

  • Hiromitsu Kimura
  • Satoshi Uda
  • Oleg Buzanov
  • Xinming Huang
  • Shinji Koh


The influence of growth atmosphere and Ir contamination on electrical resistivity of langatate (La3Ta0.5Ga5.5O14; LTG) was studied. LTG single crystals were grown via the Czochralski method under different oxygen partial pressures with Ir contamination from the Ir crucible. In addition, LTG crystals were grown by the floating zone method and they were not contaminated by Ir. The electrical resistivity and ionic transport number of these crystals were measured in the temperature range 300–1000°C. The conduction mechanism of LTG changed at about 720°C. At T < 720°C, electronic conduction was dominant, and the resistivity was affected by growth atmosphere as well as Ir contamination. In contrast, at T > 720°C, ionic conduction was dominant, and the resistivity was affected only by Ir contamination. In both temperature regions, Ir contamination decreased the resistivity by an order of magnitude.


Langatate Piezoelectric material Electrical resistivity High temperature Defect 



This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17360002) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan. We also would like to thank the Nano-Materials Project of IMR, Tohoku University, and Mitsubishi Foundation for their support.


  1. 1.
    J. Hornsteiner, E. Born, G. Fischerauer, E. Riha, Proc. IEEE. Freq. Cont. Symp. 615 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Solie, J. Bracewell, Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. 305 (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Bohm, R.B. Heimann, M. Hengst, R. Rofewer, J. Schindler, J. Cryst. Growth, 204, 128 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Takeda, S. Tanaka, S. Izukawa, H. Shimizu, T. Nishida, T. Shiosaki, Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Symp. 560 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Uda, S.Q. Wang, N. Konishi, H. Inaba, J. Harada, J. Cryst. Growth, 275, 251 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S.Q. Wang, S. Uda, J. Cryst. Growth, 250, 463 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.Q. Wang, J. Harada, S. Uda, J. Cryst. Growth, 219, 263 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Kimura, S. Uda, X. Huang, J. Cryst. Growth, 295, 36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Bamba, K. Kato, T. Taishi, T. Hayashi, K. Hoshikawa, T. Fukami, Proc. Mater. Sci. Forum, 510, 842 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. She, H.L. Tuller, J. Electroceram. 16, 115 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H. She, H.L. Tuller, J. Electroceram. 15, 193 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.F. Dubovik, K.A. Katrunov, T.I. Korshikova, Proc. IEEE Int. Freq. Cont. Symp. 638 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Wagner, Z. Phys. Chem. Abt. B21, 25 (1933)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    H. Fritze, M. Schulz, H. Seh, H.L. Tuller, S. Ganschow, K. Jacobs, Solid State Ionics, 177, 3171 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H.L. Tuller, in Nonstoiometric Oxides, ed By O.T. Sorensen (Academic press, New York, 1981), pp. 271–335Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiromitsu Kimura
    • 1
  • Satoshi Uda
    • 1
  • Oleg Buzanov
    • 2
  • Xinming Huang
    • 1
  • Shinji Koh
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Materials ResearchTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Fomos Materials Company LimitedMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations