Advertisement

Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 193–215 | Cite as

Gapless bei passives licensed by accomplishment events

  • Tzong-Hong Jonah Lin
Article
  • 400 Downloads

Abstract

This paper argues that Mandarin bei passives can be licensed by accomplishment events. It is observed that certain gapless bei passives have neither a syntactic gap nor an indefinite and hence cannot be accounted for by the A’-movement analysis or the binding analysis. This paper shows that if the complement clause of a bei passive denotes an accomplishment event, the bei passive can be licensed even if it is gapless or doesn’t contain an indefinite. It is further suggested that such passives, just like other types of bei passives, have an operator-variable structure in the complement clause. In these gapless bei passives an empty operator Op binds the embedded tense and abstracts over time.

Keywords

Mandarin bei passive Gapless Accomplishment Tense Binding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chappell, Hilary. 1986. Formal and colloquial adversity passives in standard Chinese. Linguistics 24: 1025–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, Yi-Ching, and T.-H. Jonah Lin. 2014. The syntax and semantics of changing and becoming in Mandarin Chinese. Paper presented at the 22nd meeting of International Association of Chinese Linguistics and the 26th meeting of North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  3. Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, Donald. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The logic of decision and action, ed. Nicholas Rescher, 81–95. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  5. Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dowty, David. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enç, Mürvet. 1986. Toward a referential analysis of temporal expressions. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 405–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng, Shengli. 1995. The passive construction in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 1: 1–28.Google Scholar
  9. Heim, Irene R. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  10. Her, One-Soon. 2009. Unifying the long passive and the short passive: On the bei construction in Taiwan Mandarin. Language and Linguistics 10: 421–470.Google Scholar
  11. Higginbotham, James. 1995. Sense and syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Higginbotham, James. 2000. On events in linguistic semantics. In Speaking of events, ed. James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille C. Varzi, 49–79. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Huang, C.-T.James. 1988. Wo pao de kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64: 274–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang, C.-T.James. 1999. Chinese passives in comparative perspective. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 29: 423–509.Google Scholar
  15. Kratzer, Angelika. 1995. Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In The generic book, ed. Gregory N. Carlson and Francis Jeffry Pelletier, 125–175. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In Proceedings from the 8th conference of semantics and linguistic theory, ed. Devon Strolovitch, and Aaron Lawson, 92–110. Ithaca: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Li, Y.-H. Audrey. 1990. Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lin, Jowang. 2000. On the temporal meaning of the verbal -le in Chinese. Language and Linguistics 1: 109–133.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, T.-H. Jonah. 2009. Licensing “gapless” bei passives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Montague, Richard. 1969. On the nature of certain philosophical entities. In The Monist 53: 159–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Parsons, Terence. 2000. Underlying states and time travel. In Speaking of events, ed. James Higginbotham, Fabio Pianesi, and Achille C. Varzi, 81–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Parsons, Terence. 2002. Eventualities and narrative progression. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 681–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Partee, Barbara H. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stowell, Tim. 2007. The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sybesma, Rint. 1992. Causatives and accomplishments: The case of Chinese ba. Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  28. Tai, James H.-Y. 1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, ed. David Testen, Veena Mishra, and Joseph Drogo, 289–296. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  29. Tang, Sze-Wing. 2001. A complementation approach to Chinese passives and its consequences. Linguistics 39: 257–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ting, Jen. 1998. Deriving the bei-construction in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 319–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of LinguisticsNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations