Attneave Fred (1959) Applications of Information Theory to Psychology: A summary of basic concepts, methods and results. Oxford: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Bar-Hillel, Yehoshua, Micha Perles, and Eliyahu Shamir. 1964. On formal properties of simple phrase structure grammars. In Language and Information: Selected Essays on their Theory and Application, Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, Chap 9, 116–150.
Berwick, Robert, and Samuel Epstein. 1995. On the Convergence of ‘Minimalist’ Syntax and Categorial Grammar. In: Algebraic methods in language processing : proceedings of the tenth Twente Workshop on Language Technology joint with first AMAST Workshop on Language Processing. ed. A. Nijholt.
Bever, Thomas. 1970. The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Cognition and the development of language, ed. J. Hayes, 279–360. John Wiley.
Blachman Nelson (1968) The amount of information that y
gives about X
. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT 14(1): 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brame, Michael. 1967. A new analysis of the relative clause: evidence for an interpretive theory. Unpublished manuscript.
Chen Baoguo, Aihua Ning, Hongyan Bi, Susan Dunlap (2008) Chinese subject-relative clauses are more difficult to process than the object-relative clauses. Acta Psychologica 129(1): 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen Zhong. 2014. Animacy in sentence processing across languages: an information-theoretical perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Chen, Zhong, Kyle Grove and John Hale. 2012. Structural expectations in Chinese relative clause comprehension. In Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-29), ed. J. Choi, E. A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz, and A. Trueman, 29–37, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Cherry, Colin. 1961. On human communication: a review, a survey, and a criticism, 2nd edn. New York: Science Ed.
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from building 20: essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Current studies in linguistics, Vol 24, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Chomsky Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Frank, Stefan. 2013. Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science
Frauenfelder, Uli, Juan Segui, and Jacques Mehler(1980). Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19:328–337.
Frazier Lyn (1987) Syntactic processing: Evidence from Dutch. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
5(4): 519–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner Wendell (1962) Uncertainty and structure as psychological concepts. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 2000. Dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, Language, brain: Papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium, ed. A. Marantz, Y. Miyashita, and W. O’Neil. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Gibson, Edward and Hsiao-Hung Iris Wu. 2013. Processing Chinese relative clauses in context. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(1-2):125–155.
Grenander, Ulf. 1967. Syntax-controlled probabilities. Technical Report. Providence, RI: Brown University Division of Applied Mathematics.
Guillaumin, Matthieu. 2005. Conversations between mildly context-sensitive grammars. Internship report, Ecole Normale Superieure and UCLA.
Hale, John. 2001. A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. In Proceedings of the 2nd NAACL, Pittsburgh, PA.
Hale John (2003) The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(2): 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale John (2006) Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30(4): 643–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, Na-Rae Han, Eon-Suk Ko, and Martha Palmer. 2002. Development and Evaluation of a Korean Treebank and its Application to NLP. Language and Information 6(1):123–138.
Han, Chung-hye and Jong-Bok Kim. 2004. Are there “double relative clauses” in Korean? Linguistic Inquiry 35(2):315–337.
Harkema, Henk. 2001. Parsing minimalist grammars. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Harris Theodore (1963) The Theory of Branching Processes. Springer-Verlag.
Hawkins John (2004) Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford University Press.
Hick William (1952) On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 4(1): 11–26.
Hirose, Yuki. 2009. Processing relative clauses in Japanese: coping with multiple ambiguities. In The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, Vol. II, Chapter 35, 264–269. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hoshi, Koji. 1995. Structural and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative Structural and interpretive aspects of head-internal and head-external relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Rochester.
Hsiao, Franny, and Edward Gibson. 2003. Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition 90:3–27.
Hsiao, Yaling, Jinman Li, and Maryellen MacDonald. 2014. Ambiguity affects Mandarin relative clause processing. In The 27th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Columbus, OH. The Ohio State University.
Huang, C.-T. James, Yen-Hui Audrey Li, and Yafei Li. 2009. The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge University Press.
Ishii, Yasuo. 1991. Operators and empty categories in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ishizuka, Tomoko. 2005. Processing relative clauses in Japanese. In Papers in Psycholinguistics 2, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, ed. R. Okabe and K. Nielsen, Volume 13, 135–157, Los Angeles: UCLA Linguistics Department, Los Angeles.
Ishizuka, Tomoko, Kentaro Nakatani, and Edward Gibson. 2003. Relative clause extraction complexity in Japanese. Poster presented at the 16th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
Jäger, Lena, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, Chien-Jer Charles Lin, and Shravan Vasishth. (in press). The subject-relative advantage in Chinese: Evidence for expectation-based processing. Journal of Memory and Language.
Jurafsky Daniel (1996) A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognition 20: 137–194.Google Scholar
Just, Marcel, Patricia Carpenter, Timothy Keller, William Eddy, and Keith Thulborn. 1996. Brain Activation Modulated by Sentence Comprehension. Science 274(5284):114.
Kaplan, Tamar, and John Whitman. 1995. The Category of Relative Clauses in Japanese, with Reference to Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4(1):29–58.
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Keenan, Edward, and Bernard Comrie. 1977. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8(1):63–99.
Keenan, Edward and Sarah Hawkins. 1987. The psychological validity of the Accessibility Hierarchy. In Universal Grammar: 15 Essays, ed. E. Keenan, 60–85. London: Croom Helm.
King, Jonathan and Marcel Just. 1991. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 30(5):580–602.
King, Jonathan and Marta Kutas. 1995. Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPS to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7(3):376–395.
Kurohashi, Sadao and Makoto Nagao. 2003. Building a Japanese Parsed Corpus. In Treebanks, Text, Speech and Language Technology
, ed. A. Abeillé and N. Ide Vol. 20, 249–260, Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0201-1_14
Kwon, Nayoung, Yoonhyoung Lee, Peter C. Gordon, Robert Kluender, and Maria Polinsky. 2010. Cognitive and linguistic factors affecting subject/object asymmetry: An eye-tracking study of pre-nominal relative clauses in Korean. Language 86(3):546–582.
Kwon, Nayoung, Maria Polinsky, and Robert Kluender. 2006. Subject Preference in Korean. In ed. D. Baumer, D. Montero, and M. Scanlon, 1-14. Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-25), Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Levelt, Willem. 1974. Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics, Janua linguarum. Series minor. Vol. 192. The Hague: Mouton, Recently reprinted by John Benjamins, isbn 978 90 272 3251 9.
Levy Roger (2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106: 1126–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Roger, and Galen Andrew. 2006. Tregex and Tsurgeon: tools for querying and manipulating tree data structures. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 06).
Lewis, Richard L., and Shravan Vasishth. 2005. An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Science 29:1–45.
Lin Chien-Jer Charles (2008) The processing foundation of head-final relative clauses. Language and Linguistics 9(4): 813–839.Google Scholar
Lin Chien-Jer Charles (2014) Effect of thematic order on the comprehension of Chinese relative clauses. Lingua 140: 180–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles. (submitted). Subject prominence and processing dependencies in pronominal relative clauses: The comprehension of possessive relative clauses and adjunct relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese.
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles, and Thomas Bever. 2006. Subject preference in the processing of relative clauses in Chinese. In Proceedings of the 25
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles, and Thomas Bever 2007. Processing doubly-embedded head-final relative clauses. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Relative Clauses, Cambridge, UK.
Lin, Chien-Jer Charles, and Thomas Bever. 2011. Garden path and the comprehension of head-final relative clauses. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, ed. H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose, and J. L. Packard, 277–297. Springer.
Lin, Yowyu Brian, and Susan Garnsey 2011. Animacy and the resolution of temporary ambiguity in relative clause comprehension in Mandarin. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, ed. H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose, and J. L. Packard, 241–276. Springer.
MacDonald, Maryellen, and Morten Christiansen. 2002. Reassessing working memory: A reply to Just and Carpenter and Waters and Caplan. Psychological Review 109(1):35–54.
MacWhinney Brian (1977) Starting points. Language 53: 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, Brian. 1982. Basic syntactic processes. In Language Acquisition, Syntax and Semantics, ed. S. Kuczaj, Vol. 1, Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mak, Willem M., Wietske Vonk, and Herbert Schriefers. 2002. The Influence of Animacy on Relative Clause Processing. Journal of Memory and Language 47(1):50–68.
Mecklinger, Axel, Herbert Schriefers, Karsten Steinhauer, and Angela Friederici. 1995. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and Cognition 23(4):477–94.
Michaelis, Jens. 2001. On formal properties of Minimalist Grammars. Ph. D. thesis, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Mitchell, Don, Fernando Cuetos, Martin Corley, and Marc Brysbaert. 1995. Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24:469–488.
Miyamoto, Edson, and Michiko Nakamura. 2003. Subject/object asymmetries in the processing of relative clauses in Japanese. In The 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL-22), University of California, San Diego, 342–355.
Miyamoto, Edson, and Michiko Nakamura. 2013. Unmet Expectations in the Comprehension of Relative Clauses in Japanese. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Nederhof, Mark-Jan and Giorgio Satta. 2008. Computing partition functions of PCFGs. Research on Language and Computation 6:139–162.
Ning, Chunyan. 1993. The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
O’Grady William (1997) Syntactic Development. The University of Chicago Press.
Packard, Jerome L., Zheng Ye, and Xiaolin Zhou. 2011. Filler-gap processing in Mandarin relative clauses: Evidence from event-related potentials. In Processing and Producing Head-final Structures, Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics, ed. H. Yamashita, Y. Hirose, and J. Packard, Vol 38, 219–240. Springer.
Qiao, Xiaomei, Liyao Shen, and Kenneth Forster. 2012. Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze task. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(4):611–630.
Schachter Paul (1973) Focus and relativization. Language 49: 19–46.
Schriefers, Herbert, Angela Friederici, and Katja Kühn. 1995. The Processing of Locally Ambiguous Relative Clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 34:499–520.
Sheldon Amy (1974) On the role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 272–281.
Smith, Raoul N. 1973. Probabilistic Performance Models of Language. Mouton.
Stabler, Edward. 1997. Derivational minimalism. In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics, ed. C. Retoré, Springer-Verlag.
Stromswold, Karin, David Caplan, Nathaniel Alpert, and Scott Rauch. 1996. Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language 52:452–473.
Traxler, Matthew, Robin Morris, and Rachel Seely. 2002. Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47:69–90.
Ueno, Mieko and Susan Garnsey. 2008. An ERP study of the processing of subject and object relative clauses in Japanese. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(5):646–688.
Vasishth, Shravan, Zhong Chen, Qiang Li, and Guilan Guo. 2013. Processing Chinese Relative Clauses: Evidence for the Subject-Relative Advantage. PLoS ONE 8(10):e77006.
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French Relative Clauses. Ph. D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Wanner, E. and M. Maratsos. 1978. An ATN approach in comprehension. In Linguistic theory and psychological reality, 119–161. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
Whitman, John. 2012. The prenominal relative clause problem. In Workshop on Formal Altaic Linguistics (WAFL) 8, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics (MITWPL), ed. U. Özge. Cambridge, Mass.
Wilson, Kellogg and John B. Carroll. 1954. Applications of entropy measures to problems of sequential structure. In Psycholinguistics: a survey of theory and research, ed. C. E. Osgood and T. A. Sebeok, 103–110, Indiana University Press.
Wu, Fuyun. 2009. Factors Affecting Relative Clause Processing in Mandarin: Corpus and Behavioral Evidence. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.
Wu, Fuyun and Elsi Kaiser (Submitted). Effects of early cues on the processing of Chinese relative clauses: Evidence for experience-based theories.
Wu, Fuyun, Elsi Kaiser, and Elaine Andersen. 2012. Animacy effects in Chinese relative clause processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 27(10):1489–1524.
Wu, Xiu-Zhi Zoe. 2000. Grammaticalization and the Development of Functional Categories in Mandarin. Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Southern California.
Xue, Nianwen, Fei Xia, Fu-Dong Chiou, and Martha Palmer. 2005. The Penn Chinese TreeBank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus. Natural Language Engineering
Yun, Jiwon, John Whitman, and John Hale. 2010. Subject-object asymmetries in Korean sentence comprehension. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. ed. S. Ohlsson and R. Catrambone.