Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 385–417

On Chinese appositive relative clauses

Open Access
Article

Abstract

There is currently no consensus in the literature with the respect to the semantic status of relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Some authors (Zhang 2001; Del Gobbo 2003, 2004, 2005) claim that relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese can only be interpreted as restrictives; others (see Lin 2003) instead maintain that relative clauses in this language can be both restrictive and appositive. In this paper, I claim that Chinese relative clauses modifying proper names and pronouns can indeed be appositive, but they are still crucially different from appositive relative clauses in English. Following Cinque’s (2006a, 2008a) distinction between “integrated appositive relative clauses” and “non-integrated” ones, I claim that Chinese appositive relatives belong to the class of the “integrated” ones. I furthermore propose that the typological difference between the “integrated” appositives and the “non-integrated” ones is due to the absence versus presence of the relative pronoun. Adopting Cinque’s (2006a, 2008a) theory of relativization, I propose a structure for Chinese relative clauses whereby c-command of the internal head of the relative is disallowed. This explains why the internal head of the Chinese relative clause can never be generated as a relative pronoun and, more generally, why overt relative pronouns are unavailable in prenominal relative clauses cross-linguistically. Last, the theory here outlined makes the strong empirical prediction that no prenominal relative clause can be appositive in the canonical sense.

Keywords

Restrictive relative clauses Appositive relative clauses Prenominal relative clauses Mandarin Chinese 

References

  1. Aboh, O. Enoch. 2005. Deriving relative and factive clauses. In Contributions to the Thirtieth “Incontro di Grammatica Generativa”, ed. Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert, and Giuseppina Turano, 265–285. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
  2. Abney, Steven. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Åfarli Tor. (1994) A promotion analysis of restrictive relative clauses. The Linguistic Review 11: 81–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aoun Joseph, Audrey Li Y.H. (2003) Essays on the representational and derivational nature of grammar: The diversity of wh-constructions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. Benincà, Paola, and Cecilia Poletto. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The structure of CP and IP, ed. Luigi Rizzi, 52–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cheng Lisa. (1986) De in Mandarin. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 31: 313–399Google Scholar
  7. Cheng, Lisa. 1997. Marking modification in Cantonese and Mandarin. Ms., University of California, Irvine and HIL, Leiden.Google Scholar
  8. Cinque Guglielmo (1982) On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1: 247–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1988. La frase relativa. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, vol. 1, ed. Lorenzo Renzi, 443–503. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  10. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2002. Complement and adverbial PPs: Implications for clause structure. Paper presented at the 25th Annual GLOW Colloquium, Amsterdam, April 9–11, 2002 (later published in Cinque 2006b, pp. 145–166).Google Scholar
  11. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2003. The prenominal origin of relative clauses. Paper presented at the Workshop on Antisymmetry and Remnant Movement, NYU, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Cinque Guglielmo. (2005a) Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005b. A note on verb/object order and head/relative clause order. In Grammar and beyond: Essays in honour of Lars Hellan, ed. Mila Vulchanova, and Tor A. Å farli, 69–89. Oslo: Novus Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cinque Gugliemo (2006a) Two types of appositives. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 7–56Google Scholar
  15. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006b. Restructuring and functional heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4, ed. Guglielmo Cinque. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2008a. Two types of nonrestrictive relatives. In Empirical issues in syntax and semantics 7, ed. Olivier Bonami and Patricia Cabredo Hofherr, 99–137. Accessed 14 January 2009. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss7.
  17. Cinque Guglielmo (2008) More on the indefinite character of the head of restrictive relatives. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 3–24Google Scholar
  18. Cinque, Guglielmo. In prep. The prenominal origin of relative clauses.Google Scholar
  19. Citko Barbara (2008b) An argument against assimilating appositive relatives to coordinate structures. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 633–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2001. Appositives schmappositives in Chinese. In UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 7, ed. Maki Irie, and Hajime Ono, 1–25. University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  21. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2002. Appositives and Chinese relative clauses. In CLS 38: The main session. Papers from the 38th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 1, ed. Mary Andronis, Erin Debenport, Anne Pycha, and Keiko Yoshimura, 175–190. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  22. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2003. Appositives at the interface. PhD diss., University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  23. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2004. On prenominal relative clauses and appositive adjectives. In WCCFL 23 Proceedings, ed. B. Schmeiser, Vineeta Chand, Ann Kelleher, and Angelo Rodriguez, 182–194. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  24. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2005. Chinese relative clauses: Restrictive, descriptive or appositive? In Contributions to the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, ed. Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert, and Giuseppina Turano, 287–305. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
  25. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2007. On the syntax and semantics of appositive relative clauses. In Parentheticals, ed. Nicole Dehè and Yordanka Kavalova, 173–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  26. Del Gobbo, Francesca. 2008–2009. More appositives in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your linguistics. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the LSA, San Francisco, and at WECOL, UC Davis.Google Scholar
  27. Del Gobbo, Francesca. In prep. More appositives in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your linguistics. Ms., University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  28. Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive chains in restrictive relatives, appositives and dislocation structures. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  29. Dikken, Marcel Den. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Dikken Marcel Den, Pornsiri Singhapreecha (2004) Complex noun phrases and linkers. Syntax 7: 1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In Universals of human language, vol. 4: Syntax, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 375–418. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Engdahl Elisabet. (1983) Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fukui, Naoki, and Yuji Takano. 2000. Nominal structure: An extenstion of the symmetry principle. In The derivation of vo and ov, ed. Peter Svenonius, 321–362. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Gärtner Hans-Martin (2001) Are there V2 relative clauses in German?. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 97–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Giorgi Alessandra (1984) Towards a theory of long-distance anaphors: A GB Approach. The Linguistic Review 3: 307–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  37. Huang, C.-T. James, Audrey Y.-H. Li, and Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kayne Richard S. (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Kayne Richard S. (1999) Prepositional complementizers as attractors. Probus 11: 39–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kayne, Richard S. 2000. A note on prepositions, complementizers, and word order universals. In Parameters and universals, 314–326. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kayne Richard S. (2002) On some prepositions that look DP-internal: English of and French de. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 71–115Google Scholar
  42. Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II: Complex Constructions, ed. Timothy Shopen, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms., University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  44. Lai, Janet. 2008. Complete Mandarin Chinese: The basics. New York: Living Language, Random House.Google Scholar
  45. Larson, Richard K., and Naoko Takahashi. 2007. Order and interpretation in prenominal relative clauses. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 54: Proceedings of the Workshop on Altaic Formal Linguistics II, ed. Meltem Kelepir and Belkiz Ö ztürk, 101–120. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
  46. Lin Jo-wang. (2003) On restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 33: 199–240Google Scholar
  47. Longobardi Giuseppe (1994) Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–666Google Scholar
  48. Moltmann, Friederike. 1992. Coordination and comparatives. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  49. Paul, Waltraud. 2006. The insubordinate subordinator de in Mandarin Chinese, ms., CNRS, CRLAO, EHESS, Paris.Google Scholar
  50. Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Reinhart, Tanya 2006. Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  53. Ross, John R., and David Perlmutter. 1970. Relative clauses with split antecedents. Linguistic Inquiry 1:350.Google Scholar
  54. Safir Ken (1986) Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 663–689Google Scholar
  55. Sauerland, Uli. 1998. The meaning of chains. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  56. Sauerland, Uli. 2000. Two structures for English restrictive relative clauses. In Proceedings of the Nanzan Glow, ed. Yasuaki Abe, Hiroshi Aoyagi, Masatake Arimoto, Keiko Murasugi, Mamoru Saito, and Tatsuyo Suzuki. 351–366. Nagoya: Nanzan University.Google Scholar
  57. Sauerland, Uli. 2003. Unpronounced heads in relative clauses. In The interfaces: Deriving and interpreting omitted structures, ed. Kerstin Schwabe and Susanne Winkler, 205–226. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  58. Sells, Peter. 1985a. Anaphora and the nature of semantic representation. Ms., Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  59. Sells, Peter. 1985b. Restrictive and non-restrictive modification. CSLI Report No. 85–28. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Sheehan, Michelle. 2010. The resuscitation of CED. To appear in The Proceedings of NELS 2010. Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  61. Tsao Feng-fu (1986) Relativization in Chinese and English: A contrastive study of form and function. Journal of Chinese Language Teachers Association 21: 13–47Google Scholar
  62. Vries, Mark de. 2002. The syntax of relativization. Doctoral dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  63. Vries, Mark de. 2006. The syntax of appositive relativization: On specifying coordination, false free relatives, and promotion. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 229–270.Google Scholar
  64. Vries, Mark de. 2007. Invisible constituents? Parentheticals as b-merged adverbial phrases. In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehè and Yordanka Kavalova, 203–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  65. Williams Edwin. (1977) Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 101–139Google Scholar
  66. Zhang, Niina. 2001. On the absence of nonrestrictive relatives in Chinese. Ms., ZAS, Berlin.Google Scholar
  67. Zhang Niina (2007) The syntactic derivations of split antecedent relative clause constructions. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 5: 19–47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Linguistics, School of Social SciencesUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations