Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 137–179 | Cite as

Stem-final obstruent variation in Korean

Article

Abstract

It has been observed in the literature that stem-final coronal obstruents of nouns in Korean are generally in variation with [s] in the prevocalic position: for example, /pathh-ɨl/ [pathh-ɨl] ~ [pasɨl] ‘field, accusative’. In addition, nouns with final noncoronal stops have variants ending in lenis stops: for example, /iph-e/ [iph-e] ~ [ipe] ‘leaf, locative’. Recent survey and experimental studies reveal that a wide set of coronal obstruents [s, ch, th, c, t] may occur as variants. Moreover, there is an order of preference among them: in general, s >> ch, th >> c, t. This paper first shows that the observed relative preference among variants is matched by the distribution of lexical final obstruents in noun stems. Building on Albright’s Paradigm Learning Model, I provide a unified account for the occurrence of most variants and their relative preference by proposing stochastic rules deriving the paradigmatically related forms of noun stems. In addition, a wug-test is carried out to investigate the productivity of such rules. Results suggest that these rules are productive, providing the evidence for their cognitive presence.

Keywords

Variation Stochastic rule Lexical frequency Korean noun 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahn Sang-Cheol. (2001) An introduction to Korean phonology. Seoul, HanshinGoogle Scholar
  2. Albright, Adam. 2002a. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Ph.D dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  3. Albright Adam. (2002b) Islands of reliability for regular morphology: Evidence from Italian. Language 78(4): 684–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Paradigms in Phonological Theory, ed. Laura Downing, Tracy Alan Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen, 17–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Albright, Adam. 2008. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Language universals and language change, ed. Jeff Good, 144–181. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Albright, Adam, and Bruce Hayes. 2002. Modeling English past tense intuitions with minimal generalization. In Proceedings of the 6th meeting of the ACL special interest group in Computational Phonology, ed. M. Maxwell, 58–69. Philadelphia: ACL.Google Scholar
  7. Albright Adam, Bruce Hayes. (2003) Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental Study. Cognition 90: 119–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berko Jean. (1958) The child’s learning of English morphology. Word 14: 150–177Google Scholar
  9. Boersma Paul, Bruce Hayes. (2001) Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry 32(1): 45–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bybee Joan. (1995) Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10: 425–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bybee Joan. (2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Choi, Hyewon. 2004. A survey of standard pronunciation III [phyocunpalum silthecosa III]. Seoul: The National Academy of Korean Language.Google Scholar
  13. Choi Kyung-Ae. (2002) [t] ~ [s] Alternation in Korean Loanwords. Studies in phonetics, phonology and morphology 8(2): 289–302Google Scholar
  14. Davis Stuart, Hyunsook Kang. (2006) English loanwords and the word-final [t] problem in Korean. Language Research 42(2): 253–274Google Scholar
  15. Han Eunjoo. (2002) Optimal paradigms in Korean nominal inflection. Studies in phonetics, phonology and morphology 8(2): 303–322Google Scholar
  16. Hayes, Bruce. 1998. On the richness of paradigms, and the insufficiency of underlying representations in accounting for them. Handout for talk, Stanford University, April 2, 1998.Google Scholar
  17. Hayes Bruce, Zsuzsa Cziraky Londe. (2006) Stochastic phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel harmony. Phonology 23: 59–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jun Jongho, Jeehyun Lee. (2007) Multiple stem-final variants in Korean native nouns and loanwords. Eoneohag 47: 159–187Google Scholar
  19. Kang, Beom-mo, and Kim Hung-gyu. 2004. Frequency analysis of Korean morpheme and word usage 2 [hankwuke hyengtayso mich ehwi sayong pintouy pwunsek 2]. Seoul: Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University.Google Scholar
  20. Kang, Eunji, Ho-Young Lee, and Juwon Kim. 2004. The phonetic realization of syllable codas in Korean. Malsori 49, Journal of the Korean Society of Phonetic Science and Speech Technology: 1–30.Google Scholar
  21. Kang, Yoonjung. 2003a. Sound changes affecting noun-final coronal obstruents in Korean. In Japanese/ Korean Linguistics 12, ed. W. McClure, 128–139. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  22. Kang, Yoonjung. 2003b. The emergence of phonetic naturalness in an analogical change: Evidence from Korean nouns. Handout for LANYU Forum, New York University, January 31, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. Kang, Yoonjung. 2005. The emergence of the unmarked in an analogical change. Handout from the workshop on phonological typology, Seoul National University, December 9–10, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Kang, Yoonjung. 2007. Frequency effects and regularization in Korean nouns. Handout from the workshop on variation, gradience and frequency in phonology, Stanford University, July 6–8, 2007.Google Scholar
  25. Kenstowicz, Michael. 1996. Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, ed. J. Durand and B. Laks, 363–394. Paris X and Salford: University of Salford Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, Chang-seop. 2001a. On the relationship of ‘Xha-‘ and ‘X+reul ha-‘. Language Research 37.1: 63– 85.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, Chang-seop. 2008. A study on the Korean morphology [hankwuke hyengtaelon yengu]. Seoul: Taehaksa.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, Hung-gyu, and Beom-mo Kang. 2000. Frequency analysis of Korean morpheme and word usuage 1 [hankwuke hyengtayso mich ehwi sayong pintouy pwunsek 1]. Seoul: Institute of Korean Culture, Korea University.Google Scholar
  29. Kim Hyunsoon. (2001b) A phonetically based account of phonological stop assibilation. Phonology 18: 81–108Google Scholar
  30. Kim Jin-hyung. (2005) A reconsideration of phonological leveling: A case of noun inflection in Korean. Studies in phonetics, phonology and morphology 11(2): 259–274Google Scholar
  31. Kim, Seoncheol. 2003. A survey of standard pronunciation II [phyocunpalum silthecosa II]. Seoul: The National Academy of Korean Language.Google Scholar
  32. Kim-Renaud Young-Key. (1986) Studies in Korean linguistics. Seoul, HanshinGoogle Scholar
  33. Ko Heejeong. (2006) Base-output correspondence in Korean nominal inflection. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15: 195–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ko Kwang-Mo. (1989) Explaining the noun-final change t>s in Korean. Eoneohag 11: 3–22Google Scholar
  35. Martin Samuel E. (1992) A reference grammar of Korean. Charles E. Tuttle, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  36. Mikheev Andrei. (1997) Automatic rule induction for unknown-word guessing. Computational Linguistics 23: 405–423Google Scholar
  37. Oh, Jeahyuk. 2006. A study on sound changes in noun-final consonants [cheeonmal caumeui kyoche hyunsange taehan yeonkuw]. Korea University, MA thesis.Google Scholar
  38. Oh Jeahyuk, Jiyoung Shin. (2007) A Study on sound changes in noun-final consonants and collision of the phonetic realization. Korean Linguistics 34: 209–232Google Scholar
  39. Park, Sunwoo. 2006. Paradigm uniformity effects in Korean phonology. PhD dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  40. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Stochastic phonology. GLOT 5.6: 1–13.Google Scholar
  41. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2003. Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In Probabilistic linguistics, ed. Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay, and Stefanie Jannedy, 177–228. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  42. Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2006. The statistical basis of an unnatural alternation. In Papers in laboratory phonology 8, ed. Louis Goldstein, Douglas Whalen, and Catherine Best, 81–106. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Silverman, Daniel. 2009. Neutralization and anti-homophony in Korean. Journal of Linguistics. doi:10.1017/S0022226709990247.
  44. Sohn Ho-Min. (2001a) The Korean language (Cambridge Language surveys). Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Sohn, Hyang-Sook. 2001b. Optimization of word-final coronals in Korean loanword adaptation. In Proceedings of HILP 5, ed. Caroline Fery, Antony Dubach Green, and Ruben van de Vijver, 159–177. Potsdam: University of Potsdam.Google Scholar
  46. Steriade, Donca. 2000. Paradigm uniformity and the phonetics-phonology boundary. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5, ed. Michael Broe and Janet Pierrehumbert, 313–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. You Jaewon. (1985) A reverse dictionary of modern Korean. Seoul, ChengumsaGoogle Scholar
  48. Zuraw, Kie. 2000. Patterned exceptions in phonology. PhD dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  49. Zuraw Kie. (2002) Aggressive reduplication. Phonology 19(3): 395–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zuraw Kie. (2007) The role of phonetic knowledge in phonological patterning: Corpus and survey evidence from Tagalog infixation. Language 83: 277–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsSeoul National UniversityGwanak-gu, SeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations