Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 75–102

Object Preposing in Classical and Pre-Medieval Chinese

Article

Abstract

In this paper, one of the three instances of object preposing in Classical Chinese, the structure [NP1 NP2shi / zhi V], is discussed in detail. According to their distributional differences, two structures—A [NP1 NP2shi V] and B [NP1 NP2zhi V]—are distinguished, and it is shown that both constructions, although sometimes identical in the surface structure, are subject to different syntactic and semantic constraints. This analysis challenges the hypothesis proposed by Peyraube (Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientales 26(1):3–20, 1997) that structure A [NP1 NP2shi V] was gradually replaced by structure B [NP1 NP2zhi V] during the Warring States period. In accordance with the syntactic constraints, different analyses are proposed for structures A and B in the course of the paper. Structure A, [NPS NPOshi V], is analyzed as a copula construction, a focalization (cleft) construction with the object not in preverbal position but to the right of the copula. Structure B, which is more heterogeneous than structure A, will be subdivided into different structures, only two of which will be retained as cases of a focalized and preposed object. The analysis reveals that object preposing in Classical Chinese is evidently a case of marked word order and cannot be assumed to be a vestige of an earlier SOV word order in Chinese.

Keywords

Object preposing Focalization Copula construction Classical Chinese 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldridge, Edith. 2006. VP-internal quantification in old Chinese. In Chinese linguistics in Budapest, ed. R. Djamouri and R. Sybesma, 1–15. Paris: CRLAO.Google Scholar
  2. Ao, Jinghao敖 鏡 浩. 1983. Lüelun xian Qin shiqi ‘O/shi/V’ jushi de yanbian 略 論 先 秦 時 期 ’O /是 /V 句 式 的 演 變. Zhongguo yuwen 5: 355–359.Google Scholar
  3. Ding, Zhenqu 丁 貞 蕖. 1983. Lun qian zhi binyu hou de ‘shi’ ‘zhi’ de cixing 論 前 置 賓 語 後 的 ‘是’ ‘之’ 的 詞 性. Zhongguo yuwen 2: 120–125.Google Scholar
  4. Djamouri, Redouane. 1999. The evolution of ZHI 之 in Archaic Chinese. In In honor of Mei Tsu-Lin: Studies on Chinese historical syntax and morphology, ed. Alain Peyraube and Chaofen Sun, 33–48. Paris: f cole des Hautes ftudes en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
  5. Djamouri, Redouane. 2001a. Système des pronoms démonstratifs en chinois bas archaïque. In Collected essays in Ancient Chinese grammar, ed. Redouane Djamouri, 161–176. Paris: Ecole des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.Google Scholar
  6. Djamouri, Redouane. 2001b. Markers of predication in shang bone inscriptions. In Sinitic grammar, ed. Hilary Chappell, 143–171. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gassmann Robert. (1997) Grundstrukturen der antikchinesischen syntax. Eine erklärende grammatik. Peter Lang, BernGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of grammar, ed. Joseph H. Greenberg, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gudai Hanyu xuci cidian 古 代 漢 語 虛 詞 詞 典. 1999, 2000. Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  10. Hagège Claude. (1975) Le Problème Linguistique des Prépositions et a Solution Chinoise. Sociéé de Linguistique de Paris, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. He, Leshi 何 樂 士. 1982. Lun ‘wei zhi . . . ’ ju yu ‘ . . . zhi wei’ ju 論 ‘謂 之 . . . ’ 句 與 ‘ . . . 之 謂’ 句. Gu Hanyu yanjiu lunwen ji, 103–129.Google Scholar
  12. He, Leshi 何 樂 士et al. 1985. Gudai Hanyu xuci tongshi 古 代 漢 語 虛 詞 通 釋. Beijing: Beijing chubanshe.Google Scholar
  13. Hou, John Yien-Yao. 1979. Grammatical relations in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  14. Lau, D. C. 1984, 2003. Mencius: A bilingual edition. (trans. Lau, D.C. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Li C.-N., Thompson S.-A. (1974) An explanation of word order change: SVO > SOV. Foundations of Language 12: 201–214Google Scholar
  16. Meisterernst, Barbara. 2000. Sprachwandel vom klassischen zum hanzeitlichen Chinesisch. In Münsterische Sinologische Mitteilungen, Beiträge zur Geschichte und Kultur des Alten China. ed. Ulrich Unger and Hans Stumpfeldt. Bad Honnef: Bock + Herchen.Google Scholar
  17. Mullie, Jos. L. M. 1947–1948. Grondbeginselen van de Chinese letterkundige taal. Leuven: Devallens.Google Scholar
  18. Paris Marie-Claude. (1979) Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the lian . . . ye/dou construction in Mandarin. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 23(1/2): 241–253Google Scholar
  19. Paul Waltraud. (2002) Sentence-internal topics in Mandarin Chinese: The case of object preposing. Language and Linguistics 3(4): 695–714Google Scholar
  20. Paul Waltraud. (2005) Low IP area and left periphery in Mandarin Chinese. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 33: 111–134Google Scholar
  21. Paul Waltraud, John Whitman. (2008) Shi . . . de focus clefts in Mandarin Chinese. The Linguistic Review 25(3/4): 413–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peyraube Alain. (1997) On word order in Archaic Chinese. Cahiers de linguistique Asie Orientale 26(1): 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peyraube, Alain, and Thekla Wiebusch. 1994. Problems relating to the history of different copulas in Ancient Chinese. In In honour of William S. Wang: Interdisciplinary studies on language and language change, ed. Matthew Y. Chen and Ovid J. L.Tzeng, 383–404. Taipei: Pyramide Press.Google Scholar
  24. Pulleyblank Edwin G. (1960) Studies in early Chinese grammar, Part I. Asia Major 8: 36–67Google Scholar
  25. Pulleyblank Edwin G. (1995) An outline of Classical Chinese grammar. UBC Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  26. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht et alibi: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  27. Shengli Feng. (1996) Prosodically constrained syntactic changes in early archaic chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 323–371Google Scholar
  28. Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. The syntax of focus and topic. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  29. Shyu Shu-ing. (2001) Remarks on object movement in Mandarin SOV order. Language and Linguistics 2(1): 3–124Google Scholar
  30. Takashima Ken’ichi. 1996. Morphology of the negatives. In Studies in early Chinese civilization, ed. M. Ito, and Ken’ichi Takashima. Osaka: Kansai Gaidai University Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X-bar theory. PhD dissertaion, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  32. Thesaurus Linguae Seriacae (TLS). http://tls3.uni-hd.de/Lasso/TLS/default.html. Accessed November 2009.
  33. Tseng Chiu-yu 鄭 秋 豫 ed., 1997. Zhongguo jingnei yuyan ji yuyan xue 中 國 境 內 語 言 慎 語 言 慎 (Chinese languages and linguistics IV: Typological studies of languages in China). Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  34. Unger, Ulrich. 1987. Grammatik des Klassischen Chinesisch, vols. II and III (unpublished).Google Scholar
  35. Wang, Li 王 力. 1957–1958, 1980. Hanyu shikao 漢 語 史 犒. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  36. Yin, Guoguang 殷 國 光. 1985. Xian Qin hanyu dai yufa biaozhi de binyu qien zhi jushi chutan 先 秦 漢 語 帶 語 法 標 志 的 賓 語 前 置 句 式 初 探. Yuyan Yanjiu 2: 162–171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CRLAO, EHESS, Humboldt-University Berlin, Seminar für SinologieInstitut für Asien- und AfrikawissenschaftenBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations