Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 197–232 | Cite as

Dislocation focus construction in Chinese

Open Access
Article

Abstract

The use of the Dislocation Focus Construction (DFC) (also known as “Right Dislocation”) in colloquial Chinese (including Cantonese and Mandarin) gives rise to various non-canonical word orders. In DFCs, the sentence particle (SP) occurs in a sentence-medial position. The pre- and post-SP materials are demonstrated to be syntactically connected, based on four diagnostic tests, namely (i) the zinghai ‘only’ test, (ii) the doudai (“wh-the-hell”) test, (iii) polarity item licensing, and (iv) Principle C violations. The findings offer new insights into the syntax of the Chinese left periphery and constraints on focus movement. First, the observations entail that Chinese CPs are head-initial, and an XP is obligatorily moved around the SP to a position higher than the CP. Second, the XP-raising in the DFC is argued to be driven by focus because of the focus interpretation induced. It is discovered that the focus movement is subject to the Spine Constraint, which turns out to be remarkably similar to the properties of the Nuclear Stress Rule (e.g., selection of focus set and metrical invisibility). It is argued that the DFC is the syntactic realization of the rule.

Keywords

Dislocation Focus movement Sentence particle Head-initial CP Word order Nuclear stress rule Cantonese Mandarin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The analysis of the DFC is based on my UCLA MA thesis. I am indebted to the inspiration from and discussion with Tim Stowell, Daniel Bu¨ring, Anoop Mahajan, and Dominique Sportiche. I have benefited greatly from the discussion with Francesca Del Gobbo, Victor Manfredi, Andrew Nevins, Thomas Lee, Dylan Tsai, and Michael Wagner. I am grateful for the comments from an anonymous reviewer. Special thanks go to Andrew Simpson for his suggestions and help and to James Huang for his encouragement. The preliminary version of this paper was presented at UCLA Syntax/Semantics seminar and the First International Conference on East Asian Linguistics held at the University of Toronto on November 10–12, 2006. I also thank those audiences for comments and suggestions.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Beaver David, Clark Brady (2003) Always and only: Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11: 323–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao Yuen Ren (1968) A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen Qi-hong (1995) Gu Hanyu zhuwei yiweiju ji qi xiangguan wenti [Subject-predicate dislocation in Classical Chinese and its related issues]. Xuzhou Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao 3: 69–73Google Scholar
  4. Cheng, Lisa. 1991. On the typology of Wh-questions. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  5. Cheng, Lisa. 1994. Wh-words as polarity items. In Chinese Languages and Linguistics II. Symposium Series of Institute of History and Philology, ed. Ren-Kui Li, 615–640. Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
  6. Cheung, Yam Leung (Lawrence). 1997. A study of right dislocation in Cantonese. M.Phil. thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  7. Cheung, Y.-L. Lawrence. 2005. Syntax and semantics of dislocation focus construction in Cantonese. MA thesis, UCLA.Google Scholar
  8. Cheung, Y.-L. Lawrence. 2008. Obligatory XP-raising in Chinese. In Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 28 (Proceedings of the International Conference on East Asian Linguistics), ed. Sarah Clarke, Manami Hirayama, Kyumin Kim, and Eugenia Suh, 15–28. Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, Noam. 1971. Deep structure, surface structure and semantic interpretation. In Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology, ed. Danny Steinberg and Leon Jakobovits, 183–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky Noam, Halle Morris (1968) The sound pattern of English. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Chomsky Noam (1995) The Minimalist Program. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chung Sandra, Ladusaw William, McCloskey James (1995) Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3: 239–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cinque Guglielmo (1993) A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297Google Scholar
  15. Gussenhoven Carlos (1984) On the grammar and semantics of sentence accents. Foris, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Horvath Julia (1986) Focus in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian. Foris, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  17. Horvath, Julia. 2005. Separating ‘focus movement’ from focus. Ms., Tel-Aviv University.Google Scholar
  18. Hsieh, Feng-fan. 2005. Atoms and particles. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
  19. Hsieh, Feng-fan, and Rint Sybesma. 2008. Generative syntax and sentence-final particles in Chinese. In Contemporary linguistic theories and related studies on Chinese, ed. Yang Shen and Shengli Feng, pp. 364–374. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  20. Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  21. Huang, C.-T. James, and Masao Ochi. 2004. Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. In Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS), ed. Keir Moulton and Matthew Wolf, 279–293. Amherst: University of Massachusetts GLSA.Google Scholar
  22. Ishihara, Shinichiro. 2001. Stress, focus, and scrambling. In A few from Building E-39, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 39, ed. Elena Guerzoni and Ora Matushansky, 151–185. Cambridge: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  23. Kayne Richard (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  24. Kenesei, István. 1998. On the syntactic options of focus. Ms., University of Delaware, Newark.Google Scholar
  25. Kiss Katalin (1998) Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladd Robert (1980) The structure of intonational meaning. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Law, Sam-Po. 1990. The syntax and phonology of Cantonese sentence-final particles. PhD diss., Boston University.Google Scholar
  28. Law, Ann. 2003. Right dislocation in Cantonese as a focus-marking device. In University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 15, ed. Ad Neeleman and Reiko Vermeulen, 243–275. London: University College London, Department of Phonetics and Linguistics.Google Scholar
  29. Law, Ann. 2004. Sentence-final focus particles in Cantonese. PhD diss., University College London.Google Scholar
  30. Leung, Chung-Sum. 2005. A study of the utterance particles in Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong. The Language Information Sciences Research Center, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  31. Li Y.-H. Audrey (1990) Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  32. Li Boya (2006) Chinese final particles and the syntax of the periphery. LOT Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson. 1974. Historical change of word order: A case study in Chinese and its implications. In Historical Linguistics, ed. John Anderson and Charles Jones, 199–217. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  34. Li Charles, Thompson Sandra (1981) Mandarin: A functional reference grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  35. Liang, Yuan. 2002. Dislocation in Cantonese: Sentence form, information structure, and discourse function. PhD diss., University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  36. Lu Jian-ming (1980) Hanyu kouyu jufali de yiwei xianxiang [Dislocation in the syntax of colloquial Mandarin Chinese] (in Chinese). Zhongguo Yuwen 1: 28–41Google Scholar
  37. Matthews Stephen, Yip Virginia (1994) Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Merchant Jason (2001) The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  39. Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Topics in ellipsis, ed. Kyle Johnson, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Moro Andrea (2000) Dynamic asymmetry. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Mulder René, Sybesma Rint (1992) Chinese is a VO language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10: 439–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neeleman, Ad, and Tanya Reinhart. 1998. Scrambling and the PF interface. In The projection of arguments, ed. M. Butt and W. Gueder, 309–353. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
  43. Nunes Jairo (2004) Linearization of chains and sideward movement. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  44. Packard, Jerome, and Ziqiang Shi. 1986. The grammaticalization of a ‘post-sentential’ slot in colloquial Peking Mandarin. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Sino-Tibetan Languages and Linguistics, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  45. Potts Christopher (2005) The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Potts, Christopher. 2007. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In the Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Gillian Ramchand and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Progovac Ljiljana (1994) Negative and positive polarity: A binding approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Reinhart, Tanya. 1995. Interface strategies. UiL OTS Working Papers of Theoretical Linguistics 95-002. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  49. Reinhart Tanya (2006) Interface strategies: Optimal and costly computations. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  50. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  51. Rochemont Michael (1986) Focus in generative grammar. John Benjamins, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Rooth, Mats. 1996. Focus. In The handbook of contemporary semantic theory, ed. Shalom Lappin, 271–297. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  53. Samek-Lodovici Vieri (2006) When right dislocation meets the left-periphery. Lingua 116: 836–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selkirk Elisabeth (1984) Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  55. Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John A. Goldsmith, 550–569. Cambridge, MA, and Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Simpson Andrew, Wu Zoe (2002) IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of sentence-final particles. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11: 67–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Siu, Po-on. 1986. On the relationships between final particles and wh-movement: mappings DS to SS in Chinese. MA thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  58. Sun Chao-Fen, Givón Talmy (1985) On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese: A quantified text study and its implications. Language 61(2): 329–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sybesma, Rint. 1999. Overt wh-movement in Chinese and the structure of CP. In Selected papers from the Fifth International Conference of Chinese Linguistics, ed. H.-S. Wang, F.-F. Tsai, and C.-F. Lien, 279–299. Taipei: The Crane Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  60. Tancredi, Christopher. 1990. Syntactic association with focus. In Proceedings from the first meeting of the Formal Linguistic Society of Mid-America, ed. Denise Meyer, Satoshi Tomioka, and Leyla Zidani-Eroglu, 289–303. Madison: University of WisconsinGoogle Scholar
  61. Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A-bar dependencies. PhD diss., MIT.Google Scholar
  62. Wong, W. Y. P., Marjorie K.-M. Chan, and Mary E. Beckman. 2005. An autosegmental-metrical analysis and prosodic annotation conventions for Cantonese. In Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. Sun-Ah Jun, 271–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Wu, Jianxin. 1999. A Minimalist account of quantification in Chinese. PhD diss., University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  64. Xu Liejiong (2004) Manifestation of informational focus. Lingua 114: 277–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang Feng-xian, Yang Qing-zhi (2002) Yiwei: Guhanyu kouyu yuti de yufa tezheng [Inversion: Grammar trait of colloquialism of the Archaic Chinese]. Journal of Beihua University (Social Sciences) 3(4): 67–70Google Scholar
  66. Zubizarreta, Maria L. 1994. On some prosodically governed syntactic operations. In Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, ed. G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, and R. Zanuttini, 473–486. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Zubizarreta Maria L. (1998) Prosody, focus, and word order. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations