Loanword adaptation between Japanese and Korean: evidence for L1 feature-driven perception

Article

Abstract

The purpose of the present study is two-fold. First is to propose that an L1 (host language) speakers’ perception of L2 (donor language) sounds is conditioned by the acoustic cues to the laryngeal features of the L1 grammar in the loanword adaptation of Korean voiceless stops into Japanese and of the Japanese voicing contrast and voiceless geminates into Korean. Second is to suggest the enhancing role of some L2 or L1 phonetic properties in perceiving L2 variant(s) as distinctive according to the system of L1 features in loanword adaptation.

Keywords

Loanword adaptation Japanese Korean L1 feature-driven perception 

References

  1. Amino, Kanae, Seong-Rim Ji, and Shigeko Shinohara. 2007. Perception of Japanese plosives by Korean speakers. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. J. Trouvain and W. J. Barry, 1789–1792. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
  2. Catford John Cunnison. (1977). Fundamental problems in phonetics. Indiana University Press, Bloomington Google Scholar
  3. Cho, Young-Mee Yu. 1990. Parameters of consonantal assimilation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  4. Cho, Young-Mee, and Sharon Inkelas. 1994. Post-obstruent tensification in Korean and geminate inalterability. In Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics, ed. Y.-K. Kim-Renaud, 45–60. Stanford University: CSLI.Google Scholar
  5. Davis Stuart and Mi-Hui. Cho. (2006). Phonetics versus phonology: English word final /s/ in Korean loanword phonology. Lingua 116: 1008–1023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Halle, Morris, and Ken N. Stevens. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly progress report 101: 198–212. Cambridge, MA: Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Hyman Larry M. (1970). The role of borrowing in the justification of phonological grammars. Studies in African Linguistics 1: 1–48 Google Scholar
  8. Ito Chiyuki, Yoonjung Kang and Michael Kenstowicz. (2006). The adapatation of Japanese loanwords into Korean. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 52: 65–104 Google Scholar
  9. Itô Junko. (1988). Syllable theory in prosodic phonology. Garland Publishing, New York Google Scholar
  10. Itô, Junko, and Armin Mester. 1995. Japanese phonology. In The handbook of phonological theory, ed. John Goldsmith, 817–838. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Iverson Gregory K. and Ahrong Lee. (2006). Perception of contrast in Korean loanword adaptation. Korean Linguistics 13: 49–87 Google Scholar
  12. Jun, Jongho. 1995. Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An optimality theoretic approach. Ph.D. Disseration, UCLA.Google Scholar
  13. Kenstowicz, Michael. 2005. The phonetics and phonology of Korean loanword adaptation. In ECKL 1 Proceedings of the first European conference on Korean linguistics, ed. S.-J. Rhee, 17–32. Seoul: Hankook Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Kim Chin-Wu. (1965). On the autonomy of the tensity feature in stop classification. Word 21: 339–359 Google Scholar
  15. Kim Hyunsoon. (1999). The place of articulation of Korean affricates revisited. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 313–347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim Hyunsoon. (2001a). A phonetically-based account of phonological assibilation. Phonology 18: 81–108 Google Scholar
  17. Kim Hyunsoon. (2001b). The place of articulation of the Korean plain affricate in intervocalic position: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of International Phonetics Association 31: 229–257 Google Scholar
  18. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2002. Korean tense consonants as singletons. In Proceedings of the 38th conference of Chicago Linguistic Society, ed. M. Andronis, E. Debenport, A. Pycha, and K. Yoshimura, 329–344. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2003. The feature [tense] revisited: the case of Korean consonants. In Proceedings of the 34th annual meeting of the Northeast Linguistic Society, ed. K. Moulton and M. Wolf, 319–332. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
  20. Kim Hyunsoon. (2004). Stroboscopic-cine MRI data on Korean coronal plosives and affricates: Implications for their place of articulation as alveolar. Phonetica 61: 234–251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2005. The representation of the three-way laryngeal contrast in Korean consonants. In The internal organization of phonological segments, ed. Marc van Oostendorp and Jeroen van de Weijer, 263–293. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  22. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2006. Feature-driven non-native perception in loanword adaptation of the English and French voicing contrast into Korean. Paper presented at the 14th Manchester Phonology Meeting in May 2006.Google Scholar
  23. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2007a. A feature-driven model of loanword adaptation: Evidence from Korean. Ms., Hongik University (submitted).Google Scholar
  24. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2007b. Feature-driven non-native perception in the loanword adaptation between Japanese and Korean. In Phonological studies 10, ed. the Phonological Society of Japan, 77–88. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
  25. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2007c. Stroboscopic cine-MRI and acoustic data on gradual tongue movements in Korean palatalization: implications for its coarticulatory effect. In Proceedings of the 16th international Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. J. Trouvain and W. J. Barry, 425–428. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, Hyunsoon. 2008. Korean adaptation of English affricates and fricatives in a feature-driven model of loanword adaptation. In Loan phonology, ed. A. Calabrese and W. Leo Wetzels. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers (to appear).Google Scholar
  27. Kim, Hyunsoon, Shinji Maeda, Kiyoshi Honda, and Shinobu Masaki. 2006. Japanese geminates and Korean heterosyllabic consonants: Implications for the role of prosodic organization in phonetic realization. Paper presented at the 10th laboratory phonology in Paris, June 2006.Google Scholar
  28. Kim, Hyunsoon, Shinji Maeda, and Kiyoshi Honda. 2007a. Articulatory bases of the features [tense] and [spread glottis]: Stroboscopic cine-MRI data on Korean stops and fricatives. Journal of Phonetics (to appear).Google Scholar
  29. Kim, Hyunsoon, Takeki Kamiyama, and Pierre Hallé. 2007b. Enhancement in feature-driven loanword adaptation: A case of Japanese listeners’ perception of Korean stops. Paper presented at the conference Where do features come from? Sorbonne University, Paris in Oct. 2007.Google Scholar
  30. Kim-Renaud, Young-Key. 1974. Korean consonantal phonology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
  31. Kubozono Haruo. (2006). Where does loanword prosody come from? A case study of Japanese loanword accent. Lingua 116: 1140–1170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LaCharité Darlene and Carole Paradis. (2005). Category preservation and proximity versus phonetic approximation in loanword adaptation. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 223–258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, Hyun Bok. 1999. IPA illustration of Korean. In Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 120–123. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lee Jae Kang. (2003). Auditory images of Japanese by Koreans. Enehak [Linguistics] 37: 253–266 Google Scholar
  35. Lee Jin-Hui. (1986). Hankuksokuy Ilpon [Japanese remains in Korea]. Seoul, Tongwha Publishing Google Scholar
  36. Lee Kyu-Young. (1982). Kicho Ilponetanecip [Basic Japanese vocabulary]. Seoul, Punglim Publishing Google Scholar
  37. Lee O.-Young. (1994). Chuksocihyanguy ilponin [Small is better]. Seoul, Kirinwon Google Scholar
  38. Lee O.-Young. (2001). Ilponmunhwawa sangincengsin [Japanese culture and merchant spirit]. Seoul, Munhaksasangsa Google Scholar
  39. Lee Yonoku. (2005). Odorokuhodo minitsuku Kankokugo [Learn Korean with a surprising efficienty]. Takahashi Shoten, Tokyo Google Scholar
  40. Martin Samuel E. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese (Revised edition in 2004). University of Hawaii, Honolulu Google Scholar
  41. Mohanan Karuvannur Puthanveettil. (1986). The theory of lexical phonology. D. Reidel Publishing, Dordrecht Google Scholar
  42. Pae Inwhan. (2005). Woylaye sacen [loanword dictionary]. Seoul, Mincungselim Google Scholar
  43. Peperkamp, Shavon, and Emmanuel Dupoux. 2003. Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: The role of perception. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, ed. M. J. Solé, D. Recasens, and J. Romero, 367–370. Barcelona.Google Scholar
  44. Riney Timothy J., Naoyuki Takagi, Kaori Ota and Yoto Uchida. (2007). The intermediate degree of VOT in Japanese initial voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics 35: 439–443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sagisaka, Y., and Y. Tohkura. 1984. Phoneme duration control for speech synthesis by rule. Journal of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers 67-A: 629–636.Google Scholar
  46. Sawashima, M., H. Hirose, T. Ushijima, and S. Niimi. 1975. Laryngeal control in Japanese consonants, with special reference to those in utterance-initial position. Annual Bulletin Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics 9: 21–26. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
  47. Sawata Ajumu. (2005). Sawadauy sayIlponehhoyhwa [Sawata’s New Japanese conversation]. Seoul, Kwukceyehakyenkwuso Google Scholar
  48. Shibatani Masayoshi. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  49. Shimada, Katsuko. 2000. Ilponeuytalinitoynunpep [How to master Japanese] (trans. Chung, H.). Seoul: Salamin.Google Scholar
  50. Shimizu Katumasa. (1996). A cross-language study of voicing contrasts of stop consonants in Asian languages. Seibido, Tokyo Google Scholar
  51. Silva, David. 1992. The phonetics and phonology of stop lenition in Korean. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  52. Silverman Dan. (1992). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9: 289–328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevens, Kenneth N. 2005. Features in speech perception and lexical access. In The handbook of speech perception, ed. David B. Pisoni and Robert E. Remez, 125–155. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Stevens Kenneth N. and Samuel J. Keyser. (2006). Enhancement and overlap in the speech chain. Language 82: 33–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Takeda Kazuya, Yoshinora Sagisaka and Hisao Kuwabara. (1989). On sentence-level factors governing segmental duration in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86: 2081–2087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. English edition: Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Principles of phonology (trans. Baltaxe, C.A.M.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  57. Tsujimura Natsuko. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  58. Yip Msira. (2006). The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology. Lingua 116: 950–975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yun Sona. (2004). Yasashii Hanguru [Easy Hangul] 2. Gakken, Tokyo Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EnglishHongik UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations