Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 247–271

N'-ellipsis and the structure of noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese

Article

Abstract

It has been widely assumed since Kitagawa and Ross (Linguist Anal 9: 19–53, 1982) that noun phrases in Chinese and Japanese are quite similar in structure. They are N-final in surface word order, they employ “modifying markers” (de in Chinese and no in Japanese) extensively, and they require classifiers for numeral expressions. In this paper, we argue that, contrary to appearance, they have quite distinct structures. We examine N'-ellipsis in the two languages and present supporting evidence for the hypothesis argued for by Simpson (in: Tang and Liu (eds.) On the formal way to Chinese languages, 2003), among others, that Chinese noun phrases are head-initial. According to this hypothesis, de is D, and a classifier heads another projection within DP. Japanese noun phrases, on the other hand, are head-final. No is a contextual Case marker, as proposed by Kitagawa and Ross (Linguist Anal 9: 19–53, 1982), and classifier phrases are adjuncts modifying nominal projections. Our discussion shows that Kayne’s (The antisymmetry of syntax, 1994) analysis of N-final relatives applies elegantly to Chinese but not to Japanese. It thus suggests that Japanese relative clauses are head-final throughout the derivation.

Keywords

Noun phrase Modifying marker N'-ellipsis Head parameter Determiner phrase Classifier Relative clause 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1983) Prenominal genitive NPs. The Linguistic Review 3: 1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen, Rint Sybesma (1998) Yi-wan tang, yi-ge tang: Classifiers and massifiers. Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28: 385–412Google Scholar
  3. Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen, Rint Sybesma (1999) Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The view from Building, ed. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, Vol. 20, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chomsky Noam (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Chomsky Noam (1981) Lectures on government and binding: The Pisa lectures. Foris Publications, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Chomsky Noam (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Hsieh, Chia-Ling. 1998. Guoyu de jujiao jiegou: Fenlie yu zhun-fenlie ju [Focusing construction in Mandarin Chinese: Cleft and pseudo-cleft sentences]. MA thesis, National Tsing Hua University.Google Scholar
  9. Jackendoff Ray (1971) Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35Google Scholar
  10. Kawashima Ruriko (1998) The structure of extended nominal phrases: The scrambling of numerals, approximate numerals, and quantifiers in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kayne Richard S (1994) The antisymmetry of syntax. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitagawa Chisato, Claudia Ross (1982) Prenominal modification in Chinese and Japanese. Linguistic Analysis 9: 19–53Google Scholar
  13. Li Yen-Hui Audrey (1999) Plurality in a classifier language. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 75–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin, T.-H. Jonah, Keiko Murasugi, and Mamoru Saito. 2001. Modification and specification: An investigation of no and de. Paper presented at the 10th annual meeting of the International Association of Chinese Linguistics, June 22–24, at the University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
  15. Lobeck, Anne. 1990. Functional heads as proper governors. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 20, 348–362. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  16. Miyagawa Shigeru. (1989) Structure and case marking in Japanese. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Murasugi, Keiko. 2000. An antisymmetry analysis of Japanese relative clauses. In The syntax of relative clauses, ed. Artemis Alexiandou, Paul Law, Andre Meinunger, and Chris Wilder, 231–263. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  18. Okutsu Keiichiro (1984) Seisei nihon bunpoo ron: Meishiku no koozoo [Japanese generative grammar: The structure of noun phrases]. Taishukan, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Richards Norvin (2003) Why there is an EPP. Gengo Kenkyu [Language Research] 123: 221–256Google Scholar
  20. Ross, John R. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the fifth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  21. Saito, Mamoru, and Keiko Murasugi. 1990. N'-deletion in Japanese: A preliminary study. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics, Vol. 1, 258–301. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Simpson, Andew. 2003. On the status of modifying de and the syntax of the Chinese DP. In On the formal way to Chinese languages, ed. Sze-Wing Tang and Chen-Sheng Luther Liu, 74–101. Standford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Simpson, Andrew. 2005. Classifiers and DP structure in Southeast Asia. In The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, ed. Guglielmo Cinque and Richard S. Kayne, 806–838. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Tang, C.-C. Jane. 1990. Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. PhD diss., Cornell University.Google Scholar
  25. Toyama, Akinori (2008). Suuryooshi no ninka to kaishaku [Licensing and interpretation of numeral quantifiers]. BA thesis, Nanzan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  26. Watanabe Akira (2006) Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 241–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mamoru Saito
    • 1
  • T.-H. Jonah Lin
    • 2
  • Keiko Murasugi
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Anthropology and PhilosophyNanzan UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of LinguisticsNational Tsing Hua UniversityHsinchuTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of British and American StudiesNanzan UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations