Plurality, maximality and scalar inferences: A case study of Mandarin Dou

Article

Abstract

The Mandarin functional morpheme dou appears to have been interpreted, among other things, as a distributor, focus marker even, or already. This paper aims at providing a unified semantic account for these different uses. I argue that the semantic core of these different usages is the same: dou is simply a maximality operator. It gives rise to different meanings by applying maximality to a contextually determined plural set. This could be a set of covers, a set of focus-induced alternatives, or a set of degrees ordered on a scale. This analysis also connects dou in these contexts with dou in environments that license polarity items, as discussed in Giannakidou and Cheng (J Semant 23: 135–183, 2006).

Keywords

Dou Maximality Distributivity Plurality Scales Focus Degree constructions 

References

  1. Brisson, Christine. 1998. Distributivity, maximality, and floating quantifiers. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen. (1995). On dou-quantification. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4: 197–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Giannakidou Anastasia, Cheng Lisa Lai-Shen. (2006). Definiteness, polarity, and the role of wh-morphology in free choice. Journal of Semantics 23: 135–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gillon Brendan. (1987). The readings of plural noun phrases in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Higginbotham James. (1981). Reciprocal interpretation. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 97–117Google Scholar
  6. Horn, Larry. 1969. A presuppositional analysis of only and even. In Proceedings of the 5th Chicago Linguistics Society, 98–107. Chicago University.Google Scholar
  7. Huang, Shi-Zhe. 1996. Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of Dou. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  8. Karttunen, Lauri, and Peters, Stanley. 1979. Conventional implicature. In Syntax and semantics 11: Presuppositions, ed. C. Oh and D. Dineen, 1–56. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Lee, Thomas. 1986. Studies on quantification in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  10. Lin Jo-Wang. (1998). Distributivity in Chinese and its implications. Natural Language Semantics 6: 201–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, Feng-his. 1990. Scope dependency in English and Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  12. Paris Marie-Claude. (1998). Focus operators and types of predication in Mandarin. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 27: 139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Portner Paul. (2002). Topicality and (non)specificity in Mandarin. Journal of Semantics 19: 275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  15. Schwarzschild Roger. (1996). Pluralities. Kluwer Academic Publisher, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  16. Shyu Shu-Ing. (2004). (A)symmetries between Mandarin Chinese lian...dou and shenzhi. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 32: 81–128Google Scholar
  17. von Stechow Arnim. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu, Jianxin. 1999. Syntax and semantics of quantification in Chinese. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Linguistics Department, Boylston Hall, Third FloorHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations