Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 337–362 | Cite as

Contour tones and contrast in Chinese languages

Article

Abstract

The goal of this paper is twofold. First, it discusses the tonal systems of several Chinese languages within the framework of the Theory of the Contrastive Hierarchy (Dresher et al. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13:3–27, 1994; Dresher Talk Presented at Meeting of the Canadian Linguistics Association, University of Ottawa, 1998, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 20:47–62, 2003a, Asymmetry in grammar: Morphology, phonology, acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Benjamins, Vol. 2, pp. 239–257, 2003b). In particular, this paper demonstrates that disparities between phonetic characteristics of tones and their phonological activity can be understood as a kind of underspecification that the Contrastive Hierarchy affords. The second goal of this paper is to propose an analysis in which contour tones in Chinese languages generally are represented as unitary entities rather than as a concatenation of level tones (Tone Clusters). This contrasts with the tonal systems found in African languages, in which contour tones are demonstrably composed of level tones. Thus, this paper argues for the existence of two types of contour tones in natural language: unitary contour tones and Tone Clusters.

Keywords

Tone Contour tones Contrastive hierarchy Chinese 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bao, Z. (1990). On the nature of tone. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  2. Bao Z. (1999). The structure of tone. New York, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer R., Benedict P. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology: Trends in linguistics, studies and Monographs 102. Berlin, Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauer R., Cheung K.-H., Cheung P.-M. (2003). Variation and merger of the rising tones in Hong Kong Cantonese. Language Variation and Change 15, 211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao Y.-R. (1930). A system of tone letters. Le mâitre phonetique 45, 24–47Google Scholar
  6. Chen M. (2000). Tone sandhi. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng R.L. (1973a). Some notes on tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 100, 5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng T. (1973b). The phonology of Taishan. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 1, 256–322Google Scholar
  9. Clements N., Hume E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In: Goldsmith J. (eds) The handbook of contemporary phonlogical theory. Cambridge, Blackwell, pp. 245-306Google Scholar
  10. Dresher, B. E. (1998). On contrast and redundancy. Talk presented at Annual Meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
  11. Dresher B.E. (2003a). The contrastive hierarchy in phonology. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 20, 47–62Google Scholar
  12. Dresher B.E. (2003b). Contrast and asymmetries in inventories. In: DiSciullo A.-M. (eds) Asymmetry in grammar: Morphology, phonology, acquisition Vol 2. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Benjamins, pp. 239-257Google Scholar
  13. Dresher B.E., Piggott G., Rice K. (1994). Contrast in phonology: Overview. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 13, 3–27Google Scholar
  14. Dresher B.E., Zhang X. (2005). Contrast and phonological activity in Manchu vowel systems. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 50, 45–82Google Scholar
  15. Duanmu, S. (1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  16. Duanmu S. (1994). Against contour tone units. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 555–608Google Scholar
  17. Egerod S. (1956). The Lungtu dialect. Copenhagen, Ejnar Munksgaard, LtdGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldsmith, J. (1976). Autosegmental phonology. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  19. Hashimoto O.-K.Y. (1973). The Hakka dialect: A linguistic study of its phonology, syntax and lexicon. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. He W. (1989). Huojia Fangyan Yanjiu [Studies in Huojia dialect]. Beijing, Shangwu YingshuguanGoogle Scholar
  21. Herbert R. (1975). Reanalyzing prenasalized consonants. Studies in African Linguistics 6, 105–123Google Scholar
  22. Herbert R. (1986). Language universals, markedness theory, and natural phonetic processes. Berlin, Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
  23. Him K.T. (1980). Semantic-tonal processes in Cantonese, Taishanese, Bobai, and Siamese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 8, 205–240Google Scholar
  24. Kao D. (1971). Structure of the syllable in Cantonese. The Hague, MoutonGoogle Scholar
  25. Killingley S.-Y. (1985). A new look at Cantonese tones: Five or six?. Newcastle upon Tyne, Siew Yue KillingleyGoogle Scholar
  26. Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. Dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  27. Leben W. (1978). The representation of tone. In: Fromkin V. (eds) Tone: A linguistic survey. New York, NY, Academic Press, pp. 177-219Google Scholar
  28. Lombardi L. (1990). The nonlinear organization of the affricate. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 8, 375–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maddieson I. (1978). Universals of tone. In: Greenberg J. (eds) Universals of Human Language. Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, pp. 335-366Google Scholar
  30. Matthews S., Yip V. (1994). Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Mielke, J. (2004). The emergence of distinctive features. Dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  32. Mortensen, D. (2002). Semper Infidelis: Theoretical Dimensions of Tone Sandhi Chains in Jingpho and A-Hmao. Retrieved from http://socrates.berkeley.edu/edmort_semper_infidelis.pdf.Google Scholar
  33. Pham H. (2003). Vietnamese tone: A new analysis. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  34. Phoon, M.-K. (1976). A synchronic phonology of modern Cantonese dialect. Institute of Humanities and Social Science, College of Graduate Studies: Nanyang University Occasional Paper Series, No. 39.Google Scholar
  35. Pike K. (1948). Tone languages. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Sagey, E. (1986). The representation of features and relations in nonlinear phonology. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  37. Steriade, D. (1989). Africates are stops. Paper presented at Conference on Features and Underspecification, MIT, October 1989.Google Scholar
  38. Steriade D. (1993). Closure, release, and nasal contours. In: Huffman M., Krakow R. (eds) Phonetics and phonology. Nasals, nasalization and the velum (Vol. 5). San Diego, CA, Academic Press, pp. 401-470Google Scholar
  39. Wan I.-P., Jaeger J. (1998). Speech errors and the represeantation of tone in Mandarin Chinese. Phonology 15, 417–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang W. (1967). Phonological features of tone. International Journal of American Linguistics 33, 93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yip, M. (1980). The tonal phonology of Chinese. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  42. Yip M. (1989). Contour tones. Phonology 6, 149–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yip M. (1995). Tone in east Asian languages. In: Goldsmith J. (eds) The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell Publishing, pp. 476-494Google Scholar
  44. Yip M. (2001). Tonal features, tonal inventories and phonetic targets. University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 13, 161–188Google Scholar
  45. Zhang J. (2002). The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution—A typological survey and formal analysis. New York City, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations