Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 259–302

A directional asymmetry in Chinese tone sandhi systems

Article

Abstract

Chinese tone sandhi systems are often classified as left-dominant or right-dominant depending on the position of the syllable retaining the citation tone. An asymmetry exists between the two types of systems: left-dominant sandhi often involves rightward extension of the initial tone to the entire sandhi domain; right-dominant sandhi, however, often involves default insertion and paradigmatic neutralization of nonfinal tones. I argue that the extension of a tone to a larger domain may serve two markedness purposes: the reduction of tonal contours on a syllable and the reduction of pitch differences across syllable boundaries, both of which have a rightward directionality preference. The former is due to the durational advantage afforded by final lengthening; the latter is due to the universal preference for progressive tonal coarticulation. I show that a theory that formally encodes these preferences via intrinsic constraint rankings can predict the directional asymmetry noted above.

Keywords

Tone sandhi Tone spreading Contour tones Optimality Theory Factorial typology Faithful Alignment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baković, E. (2000).Harmony, dominance, and control. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  2. Bao, Z.-M. (1990). On the nature of tone . Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  3. Bao Z.-M. (1999). The structure of tone. Oxford University Press, New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrie M. (2006). Tone circles and contrast preservation. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckman, J. N. (1998). Positional faithfulness. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  6. Beckman, M. E., & Edwards, J. (1990). Lengthening and shortening and the nature of prosodic constituency. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in the laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech (pp. 152–178). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Black, J. W. (1970). The magnitude of pitch inflection. InProceedings of the 6th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 177–181). Prague: Academia.Google Scholar
  8. Byrd D. (2000). Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57, 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan M.K.M. (1991). Contour-tone spreading and tone sandhi in Danyang Chinese. Phonology 8, 237–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chan, M. K. M. (1995). An autosegmental analysis of Danyang tone sandhi: Some historical and theoretical issues. In E. Zee (Ed.), Wuyu yanjiu [Studies of the Wu dialects](pp. 145–184). Hong Kong: New Asia Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Chan M.K.M., Ren H.-M. (1989). Wuxi tone sandhi. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 21(2): 35–64Google Scholar
  12. Chao Y.-R. (1948). Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Harvard University Press. Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Chao Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen, H.-M. (1997). Haikouhua yindang [The sound archive of Haikou]. In Jingyi Hou (Ed.), Xiandai hanyu fangyan yinku[The sound archives of modern Chinese dialects]. Shanghai:Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai Education Press].Google Scholar
  15. Chen M.Y. (1987). The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology Yearbook 4, 109–150Google Scholar
  16. Chen M.Y. (2000). Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Cheng R.L. (1968). Tone sandhi in Taiwanese. Linguistics 41, 19–42Google Scholar
  18. Cho T.-H., Keating P. (2001). Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 292, 155–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cinque G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 239–297Google Scholar
  20. Clark, M. M. (1983). On the distribution of contour tones. In M. Barlow et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 2 (pp. 44–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  21. de Lacy P. (2002). The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology 19, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duanmu, S. (1990). A formal study of syllable, tone, stress and domain in Chinese languages. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  23. Duanmu S. (1993). Rime length, stress, and association domains. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2, 1–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duanmu S. (1994a). Against contour tone units. Linguistic Inquiry 25.4, 555–608Google Scholar
  25. Duanmu S. (1994b). Syllabic weight and syllabic duration: A correlation between phonology and phonetics. Phonology 11, 1–24Google Scholar
  26. Duanmu S. (1995). Metrical and tonal phonology of compounds in two Chinese dialects. Language 71.2, 225-259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duanmu S. (1996). Tone: An overview. Glot International 2.4, 3–10Google Scholar
  28. Duanmu S. (1999). Metrical structure and tone: Evidence from Mandarin and Shanghai. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8, 1–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duanmu S. (2000). The phonology of Standard Chinese. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Edwards J., Beckman M.E., Fletcher J. (1991). The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 369–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fougeron C., Keating P. (1997). Articulatory strengthening at the edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 3728–3740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fu, G.-T. (1984). Wuyi fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Wuyi dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1984.2, 109–127.Google Scholar
  33. Gandour, J. T. (1978). The perception of tone. In Victoria A. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 41–76). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gandour J., Potisuk S., Dechongkit S. (1994). Tonal coarticulation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics 22, 474–492Google Scholar
  35. Gandour J.T., Harshman R.A. (1978). Crosslanguage differences in tone perception: A multidimensional scaling investigation. Language and Speech 21, 1–33Google Scholar
  36. Gordon, M. (1999). Syllable weight: Phonetics, phonology, and typology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  37. Greenberg S., Zee E. (1979). On the perception of contour tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 45, 150–164Google Scholar
  38. Han M.S., Kim K.-O. (1974). Phonetic variation of Vietnamese tones in disyllabic utterances. Journal of Phonetics 2, 223–232Google Scholar
  39. Hayes, B., Tesar, B., & Zuraw, K. (2003). OTSoft 2.1, software package, http://www.linguistics. ucla.edu/people/hayes/otsoftGoogle Scholar
  40. He, W. (1979). Huojia fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Huojia dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1979.2, 122–136.Google Scholar
  41. Hofhuis, E., Gussenhoven, C., & Rietveld, A. (1995). Final lengthening at prosodic boundaries in Dutch. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Phonetic Sciences ’95, Vol. 1 (pp. 154– 157). Stockholm: KTH and Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
  42. Hsieh, F.-F. (2005). Tonal chain-shifts as anti-neutralization-induced tone sandhi. In S. Arunachalam, T. Scheffler, S. Sundaresan, & J. Tauberer (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 11.1(pp. 99– 112). Philadelphia: Penn Linguistics Circle.Google Scholar
  43. Hsieh, H.-I. (1970). The psychological reality of tone sandhi rules in Taiwanese. In Papers from the 6th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 489-503). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  44. Hsieh, H.-I. (1975). How generative is phonology? In E. F. Koerner (Ed.), The transformational- generative paradigm and modern linguistic theory (pp.109-144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  45. Hsieh H.-I. (1976). On the unreality of some phonological rules. Lingua 38, 1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hyman L.M., VanBik K. (2004). Directional rule application and output problems in Hakha Lai tone. Language and Linguistics 5.4, 821–861Google Scholar
  47. Iwata, R. (1982). Lianyungangshi fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the dialect of Lianyungang City]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1982.4, 285–296.Google Scholar
  48. Jiang-King, P. (1996). An optimality account of tone-vowel interaction in Northern Min.dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  49. Jiang-King, P. (1999). Sonority constraints on tonal distributions across Chinese dialects. In K. N. Shahin et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 17(pp. 332–346). Stanford University: CSLI Publication.Google Scholar
  50. Johnson K., Martin J. (2001). Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: Effects of distinctive length and position in the word. Phonetica 58, 81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kennedy G.A. (1953). Two tone patterns in Tangsic. Language 29, 367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Klatt D.H. (1975). Vowel lengthening is syntactically determined in connected discourse. Journal of Phonetics 3, 129–140Google Scholar
  53. Klatt D.H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptional evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 1208–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lehiste, I. (1960). An acoustic phonetic study of internal open juncture. Supplement to Phonetica, 5.Google Scholar
  55. Lehiste I. (1972). Timing of utterances and linguistic boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51, 2108–2124Google Scholar
  56. Li, Z.-Q. (2003). The phonetics and phonology of tone mapping in a constraint-based approach.Ph. D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  57. Li, Z.-Q. (2005). Dual prominence in tone mapping: A case of tone movement. Paper presented at WCCFL 24, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  58. Lin J.-W. (1994). Lexical government and tone group formation in Xiamen Chinese. Phonology 11, 237–275Google Scholar
  59. Lin, L.-T., & Pan, W.-S. (1998). Jian’ouhua yindang[The sound archive of Jian’ou]. In Jingyi Hou (Ed.),Xiandai hanyu fangyan yinku[The sound archives of modern Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai Education Press].Google Scholar
  60. Lindblom, B. (1968). Temporal organization of syllable production. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 2–3, 1–5.Google Scholar
  61. Lindblom, B., & Rapp, K. (1973). Some temporal regularities of spoken Swedish. In Papers from the Institute of Linguistics (PILUS), 21. University of Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
  62. Lindblom, B., Lyberg, B., & Holmgren, K. (1981). Durational patterns of Swedish phonology: Do they reflect short-term motor memory processes? Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  63. Lombardi L. (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in Optimality Theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 267–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. LÛ , S.-X. (1980). Danyang fangyan de shengdiao xitong [The tonal system of the Danyang dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1980.2, 85–122.Google Scholar
  65. Lyberg B. (1977). Some observations on the timing of Swedish utterances. Journal of Phonetics 5, 49–59Google Scholar
  66. Maddieson, I. (1977).Universals of tone: Six studies. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.Google Scholar
  67. McCarthy J. (2003). OT constraints are categorical. Phonology 20, 75–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ohala, J. J. (1978). Production of tone. In Victoria A. Fromkin (Ed.), Tone: A linguistic survey (pp. 5-39). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  69. Oller D.K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 1235–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pan, W.-Y. (1998). Wenzhouhua yindang(The sound archive of Wenzhou). In Jingyi Hou (Ed.), Xiandai hanyu fangyan yinku[The sound archives of modern Chinese dialects]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai Education Press].Google Scholar
  71. Peng S.-H. (1997). Production and perception of Taiwanese tones in different tonal and prosodic contexts. Journal of Phonetics 25, 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar.Ms., Rutgers University & University of Colorado, Boulder. Revised version published in 2004 by Malden, MA/Oxford, UK/Carlton, Australia: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Rose P. (1990). Acoustics and phonology of complex tone sandhi. Phonetica 47, 1-35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Steriade, D. (to appear). The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. To appear in S. Inkelas, & K. Hanson (Eds.), The nature of the word: Essays in honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  75. Strangert, E. (1985). Swedish speech rhythm in a cross-language perspective. Acta Universitatis Umensis, Umea Studies in the Humanities, 69. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.Google Scholar
  76. Sundberg J. (1979). Maximum speed of pitch changes in singers and untrained subjects. Journal of Phonetics 7, 71–79Google Scholar
  77. Tang, Z.-F. (1960). Hunan Dongkouxian Huangqiaozhen fangyan [The dialect of Huangqiao, Dongkou County, Hunan Province]. Yuyanxue Luncong [Forum in Linguistics], 4, 83–133.Google Scholar
  78. Wang, H. S. (1993). Taiyu biandiao de xinli texing [On the psychological status of Taiwanese tone sandhi]. Tsinghua Xuebao [Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies], 23, 175–192.Google Scholar
  79. Wang, P. (1988). Changzhou fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Changzhou dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1988.3, 177–194.Google Scholar
  80. Wang W. (1967). Phonological features of tone. International Journal of American Linguistics 33, 93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang, Y.-J. (1996). Qingsheng yingao suoyi [Pitch qualities of the neutral tone]. Shijie Hanyu Jiaoxue [International Journal of Chinese Pedagogy], 37.3, 50–53.Google Scholar
  82. Wang, Z.-J., & Feng, S.-L. (2006). Shengdiao duibifa yu Beijinghua shuangyinzu leixing [Tonal contrast and disyllabic stress patterns in Beijing Mandarin]. Yuyan Kexue[Linguistic Sciences], 5.1, 3–22.Google Scholar
  83. Wightman C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel S., Ostendorf M., Price P.J. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 1707–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Xie, L.-W. (1992). Jiangxisheng Yudu fangyan liangzizu liandu biandiao [Disyllabic tone sandhi in the Yudu dialect of Jiangxi Province]. Fangyan [Dialects], 1992.3, 222–227.Google Scholar
  85. Xu, B.-H., Tang, Z.-Z., & Qian, N.-R. (1981). Xinpai Shanghai fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the New Shanghai dialect].Fangyan [Dialects], 1981.2, 145–155.Google Scholar
  86. Xu Y. (1997). Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 25, 61–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Xu Y., Sun X.-J. (2002). Maximum pitch change and how it may relate to speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111, 1399–1413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Yip M. (1989). Contour tones. Phonology 6, 149–174Google Scholar
  89. Yip, M. (2003). Feet and tonal reduction at the word and phrase level in Chinese. In J. McCarthy (Ed.), Optimality Theory in phonology: A reader (pp. 228–245). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  90. You, R.-J. (1994). Shanghaihua yindang[The sound archive of Shanghai]. In Jingyi Hou (Ed.), Xiandai hanyu fangyan yinku[The sound archives of modern Chinese dialects]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaoyu Chubanshe [Shanghai Education Press].Google Scholar
  91. Yue-Hashimoto, A. O. (1987). Tone sandhi across Chinese dialects. In Chinese Language Society of Hong Kong (Ed.), Wang Li memorial volumes, English volume(pp. 445–474). Hong Kong: Joint Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  92. Zee E., Maddieson I. (1979). Tone and tone sandhi in Shanghai: Phonetic evidence and phonological analysis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 45, 93–129Google Scholar
  93. Zhang, J. (1999). Duration in the tonal phonology of Pingyao Chinese. In M. K. Gordon (Ed.), UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics, Papers in Phonology3, 147–206.Google Scholar
  94. Zhang, J. (2000a). The phonetic basis for tonal melody mapping in Mende and elsewhere. In R. Billerey & B. Lillehaugen (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 19(pp. 603–616). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  95. Zhang, J. (2000b). Non-contrastive features and categorical patterning in Chinese diminutive suffixation-Max[F] or Ident[F]? Phonology, 17, 427-478.Google Scholar
  96. Zhang, J. (2002). The effects of duration and sonority on contour tone distribution—A typological survey and formal analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Zhang J. (2004). Contour tone licensing and contour tone representation. Language and Linguistics 5.4, 926-968Google Scholar
  98. Zhang, J., Lai, Y.-W., & Turnbull-Sailor, C. (2006). Wug-testing the “tone circle” in Taiwanese. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 25, 453–461. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  99. Zhang, J. (to appear a). Contour tone distribution is not an artifact of tonal melody mapping. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 33.1.Google Scholar
  100. Zhang, J. (to appear b). The formal comparison between constraint weighting and constraint domination. To appear in Phonology, 24.Google Scholar
  101. Zhang, S.-Y. (1979). Chaoyang fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Chaoyang dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects],1979.2, 93-121.Google Scholar
  102. Zhang, Z.-X. (1983). Zhangping (Yongfu) fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Zhangping (Yongfu) dialect]. Fangyan [Dialects],1983.3, 175–196.Google Scholar
  103. Zheng-Zhang, S.-F. (1964). Wenzhou fangyan de liandu biandiao [Tone sandhi in the Wenzhou dialect]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Chinese Philology],129, 106–152.Google Scholar
  104. Zhu, X.-N. S. (1999). Shanghai tonetics.MÜ nchen and Newcastle: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
  105. Zoll C. (2003). Optimal tone mapping. Linguistic Inquiry 34.2, 225–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsThe University of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations