Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 171–191 | Cite as

Honorification and light verbs in Japanese

Article

Abstract

This paper deals with the syntactic structure of subject-honorific and object-honorific constructions in Japanese through a detailed examination of the morphological make-up of the so-called honorific form of verbs. The main claim is that the honorific form of verbs actually consists of separate morphemes, which include honorific prefixes, verb stems, nominalisation suffixes, and light verbs. We further argue that the honorific prefix o-, which has been generally disregarded in previous literature, is a functional category which heads its own projection. The proposed analysis solves a long-standing problem in the investigation of Japanese honorific constructions, as to why honorific verbs cannot be separated from light verbs, originally pointed out by Harada (1976). Furthermore, this analysis shows how the syntactic distinction between the light verbs naru and suru leads to the meaning difference between the subject-honorific and object-honorific constructions.

Keywords

Honorifics Light verb Japanese Agreement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bobaljik J., Yatsushiro K. (2006). Problems with honorification-as-agreement in Japanese: A reply to Boeckx and Niinuma. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 355–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boeckx C., Niinuma F. (2004). Conditions on agreement in Japanese. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 453–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chomsky N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, Mass, MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Chomsky N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In: Kenstowicz M. (ed) Ken Hale: A life in language. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, pp. 1–52Google Scholar
  5. Grimshaw J., Mester A. (1988). Light verbs and theta marking. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 205–232Google Scholar
  6. Harada S.I. (1976). Honorifics. In: Shibatani M. (ed). Syntax and semantics 5: Japanese generative grammar. New York, Academic Press, pp. 499–561Google Scholar
  7. Ivana, A., & Sakai, H. (2006). Honourification in the nominal domain in Japanese: An agreement- based approach. Ms. Hiroshima University.Google Scholar
  8. Kishimoto H. (1996). Agr and agreement in Japanese. In: Koizumi M., Oishi M., Sauerland U. (eds). Formal approaches to Japanese linguistics 2. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 29. Cambridge, Mass, pp. 41–60Google Scholar
  9. Kuno S. (1989). Keigobun no Koozoo [The structure of honorific constructions]. In: Kuno S., Shibatani M. (eds). Nihongogaku no Shintenkai [New directions in Japanese linguistics]. Tokyo, Kuroshio, pp. 103–124Google Scholar
  10. Kuroda, S. Y. (1965). Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  11. Lasnik, H. (1999). Verbal morphology: Syntactic structure meets the minimalist program. In Minimalist analysis (pp. 97–119). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Mikami, A. (1970). Bunpoo Shooronshuu [Collection of short papers in grammar] (pp. 95–96). Reprinted 1987. Tokyo: Kuroshio Shuppan.Google Scholar
  13. Oono, S. (1966). Nihongo no Nenrin [The growth rings of the Japanese language] (pp. 56–67). Reprinted 1999. Tokyo: Shinkoosha.Google Scholar
  14. Saito M., Hoshi H. (2000). Japanese light verb construction and the minimalist program. In: Martin R., Michaels D., Uriagereka J. (eds) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press, pp. 261–295Google Scholar
  15. Sakai H., Ivana A., Zhang C. (2004). The role of light verb projection in transitivity alternation. English Linguistics, Nihon Eigo Gakkai [The Japanese Society of English Linguistics] 21: 348–375Google Scholar
  16. Shibatani M. (1990). The languages of Japan. Cambridge, Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  17. Suzuki, T. (1989). A syntactic analysis of an honorific construction o ...-ni naru. In J. Fee & K. Hunt (Eds.), The proceedings of the 8th West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 373–383). Stanford Linguistics Association, CSLI, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  18. Takita, K. (2005). Nihongo-no Keigobun-no Toogokoozoo [Syntactic Structure of Japanese Honorific sentences]. In Proceedings of the 131st meeting of Linguistic Society of Japan, Hiroshima University, pp. 16–21.Google Scholar
  19. Toribio, A. J. (1990). Specifier-head agreement in Japanese. In A. L. Halpern (Ed.), The proceedings of the 9th West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 535–548). Stanford Linguistics Association, CSLI, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  20. Vance T.J. (1987) An introduction to Japanese phonology. Albany, State University of New York PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of EducationHiroshima UniversityHiroshima-kenJapan

Personalised recommendations