The role of phonemic contrast in the formation of Sino-Japanese

Orginal Paper


When a language adapts words from another language, the adapting language (L1) naturally tries to retain the phonemic contrasts of the source language (L2). However, if the L2 has a greater degree of contrast than the L1 then either the extra degree(s) of contrast will be lost, or the L1 must introduce markedness into its phonological system. The objective of this article is twofold

First, I argue that the introduction of markedness into the L1’s phonology when adapting words from another language correlates with the social relationship between the languages. I demonstrate this by examining the retention of phonemic contrast in the various stages of the adaptation of Chinese words into Japanese

Second, I argue for a phonological constraint that enforces the retention of L2’s phonemic contrast, DISTINCT. An Optimality Theoretic analysis of the adaptation of Sino-Japanese produces the expected results for all of stages of adaptation except one—the stage when contact between the two languages is at its peak. For this stage, the analysis requires the addition of the DISTINCT constraint


Sino-Japanese Loanword adaptation Phonological contrast Japanese Chinese 


  1. Baxter W. (1994). A handbook of old Chinese phonology. Mouton de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentley J. (2001). A descriptive grammar of early old Japanese prose. Brill, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  3. Clements G.N., Hume E. (1995) Internal organization of speech sounds. In: Goldsmith J. (eds). The handbook of phonological theory. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp. 245–306Google Scholar
  4. Ding, Q. (1981). Chūgoku Kotoba no Zatsugaku [Various Notes on the Chinese Language], Kōhō Kikaku Centre, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  5. Flemming, E. (1995). Auditory representations in phonology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Itô J., Mester A. (1994) Reflections on CodaCond and alignment. In: Merchant J., Padgett J., Walker R. (eds). Phonology at Santa Cruz 3. University of California, Santa Cruz: Linguistics Researcher Center, pp. 27–46Google Scholar
  7. Itô J., Mester A. (1995). The core-periphery structure of the lexicon and constraints on reranking. In: Beckman J., Walsh-Dickey L., Urbanczyk S. (eds). University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in optimality theory. GLSA, Amherst, pp. 181–209Google Scholar
  8. Itô J., Mester A. (1996) Stem and word in Sino-Japanese. In: Otake T., Cutler A. (eds). Phonological structure and language processing: Cross-linguistic studies. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 13–44Google Scholar
  9. Itô J., Mester A. (2000) The phonological lexicon. In: Tsujimura N. (eds). The handbook of Japanese linguistics. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp. 62–100Google Scholar
  10. Jacobs H., Gussenhoven C. (2000) Loan phonology: Salience, the lexicon and optimality theory. In: Dekkers J., van der Leeuw F., van de Weijer J. (eds). Optimality theory: Phonology, syntax, and acquisition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 193–210Google Scholar
  11. Kager R. (1999) Optimality theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Karlgren B. (1954). Compendium of phonetics in Ancient and Archaic Chinese, reprinted from Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities 26:211–367Google Scholar
  13. Kishida T. (1998). Kokugo On’in Henka Ron [A theory of the phonological change of Japanese]. Musashino Shoin, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurisu K. (2000). Richness of the base and root fusion in Sino-Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9:147–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LaCharité D., Paradis C. (1997). Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation. Journal of Linguistics 33:379–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lange R. (1973) The phonology of eighth-century Japanese. Sophia University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  17. Loveday L. (1996) Language contact and Japan—a socio-linguistic history. Clarendon Press and Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Lubowicz, A. (2003). Contrast in phonological mappings. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin S. (1987) The Japanese language through time. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  20. McCarthy J., Prince A. (1995) Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In: Beckman J., Benua L., Urbanczyk S. (eds). University of Massachusetts occasional papers in linguistics 18: Papers in optimality theory. GLSA, Amherst, pp. 249–384Google Scholar
  21. McCawley J. (1968). The phonological component of grammar. Mouton, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  22. Miller R. (1967) The Japanese language. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Numoto, K. (1986). Nihon Kanji’on no Rekishi [The history of Japanese Kanji readings]. Tōkyōtō, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  24. Padgett J. (2003). Contrast and post-velar fronting in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21:39–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Paradis C. (1988). On constraints and repair strategies. The Linguistic Review 6:71–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Paradis C., Prunet J.-F. (2000) Nasal vowels as two segments: Evidence from borrowings. Language 76:324–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pulleyblank E. (1984) Middle Chinese—a study in historical phonology. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  28. Pulleyblank E. (1991) Lexicon of reconstructed pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese and Early Mandarin. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  29. Shibatani M. (1990) The languages of Japan. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  30. Silverman D. (1992). Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: Evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9:289–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shitanaka K. (eds) (1980) Sekai Chizuchō [World atlas]. Heibonsha, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  32. Syromiatnikov N. (1981) The Ancient Japanese language, translated by Y N Filippov. Nauka Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  33. Wardhaugh R. (1998) An introduction to sociolinguistics (3rd ed). Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Yip M. (1993) Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 2:261–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yoshitake S. (1934) The phonetic system of Ancient Japanese. The Royal Asiatic Society, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations