Journal of East Asian Linguistics

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 27–42 | Cite as

Complex Predicates, Aspect, and Anti-reconstruction

Original Paper

Abstract

This paper contrasts two families of approaches to certain affixal verb constructions in Japanese, with particular emphasis on the ’potential’ construction. Scope facts in this construction have been offered as support for complex predicate analyses, in which there is no syntactic constituent consisting of the object and lower verb, to the exclusion of the potential head -rare. We provide a variety of arguments, primarily from aspectual modification properties, which strongly challenge this family of approaches and favor instead VP-complementation approaches in which the potential head selects a thematically complete VP complement. Finally, we show how the scope facts may be accommodated on such a viewpoint, drawing connections to similar properties with other restructuring configurations cross-linguistically.

Keywords

Complex predicates Reconstruction Restructuring Japanese Aspect VP-structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bobaljik J.D., Wurmbrand S. (2005). The domain of agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, 809–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dowty D. (1979). Word meaning and montague grammar. Dordrecht, ReidelGoogle Scholar
  3. Futagi, Y. (2004). Japanese focus particles at the syntax–semantics interface. Ph.D. Dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  4. Harada, Y., & Noguchi, N. (1992). On the semantics and pragmatics of dake (and only). In C. Barker, & D. Dowty Eds.), SALT II (pp. 125–144). (Working Papers in Linguistics 40), Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  5. Hoshi, H. (1999). Complex predicate formation in Japanese: A (Non-)configurational theory. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 427–473.Google Scholar
  6. Kathol A. (2000). Linear syntax. New York/Oxford, UK, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Kato, S. (2003). Derivational theta-marking: A minimalist approach to the complex predicate constructions in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of Linguistic Society of Japan] 124, 37–96.Google Scholar
  8. Koizumi, M. (1995). Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
  9. Manning C., Sag I., Iida M. (1999). The lexical integrity of Japanese causatives. In: Levine R.D., Green G.M. (eds) Studies in contemporary phrase structure grammar. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, pp. 39-79Google Scholar
  10. Matsumoto Y. (1996). Complex predicates in Japanese: A syntactic and semantic study of the notion ’word’. Stanford, Calif, CSLI PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  11. Nomura, M. (2003). The true nature of nominative objects in Japanese. In E. Kaiser, & S. Arunachalam (Eds.), U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics Proceedings of the 26th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (pp. 169–183). Penn Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  12. Nomura, M. (2005). Nominative case and AGREE(ment). Ph.D. Dissertation, Storrs: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  13. Rooth, M. (1985). Association with Focus. Ph.D. Dissertation, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  14. Rothstein, S. D. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of lexical aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Saito, M. (2000). Predicate raising and theta relations. In Proceeding of 2000 Seoul International Conference on Language and Computation (pp. 85–113). The Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
  16. Saito, M., & Hoshi, H. (1998). Control in Complex Predicates. ms., Nanzan University and SOAS.Google Scholar
  17. Sano M. (1985). LF movement in Japanese. Descriptive and Applied Linguistics, 18, 245–259Google Scholar
  18. Tada H. (1992). Nominative objects in Japanese. Journal of Japanese Linguistics, 14, 91–108Google Scholar
  19. Takano, Y. (2003). Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions: A prolepsis analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 779–834.Google Scholar
  20. Wurmbrand S. (2001). Infinitives: Restructuring and clause structure. Berlin/New York, Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar
  21. Wurmbrand S. (2004). Two types of restructuring-Lexical vs. functional. Lingua, 114, 991–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wurmbrand, S. (2005). How complex are complex predicates? ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs; to appear in Syntax.Google Scholar
  23. Yokota, K. (2001). Complex-predicate formation and some consequences in Japanese, Abstract for LFG 2001 conference: http://www.hku.hk/linguist/research/Ab_Yokota.htmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations