The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 283–322 | Cite as

Adjectival inflection as diagnostic for structural position: inside and outside the Icelandic definiteness domain

Original Paper

Abstract

This article attempts to account for the distribution of Icelandic adjectival inflection in a manner that also captures a problematic case that has not been satisfactorily analyzed in the literature. It is argued that weak inflection is triggered if the adjective is c-commanded by a feature [definite]. Strong inflection occurs precisely if weak inflection is not triggered. This implementation accounts for the occurrence of strong inflection on predicative adjectives and adnominal adjectives in indefinite noun phrases, but moreover allows us to account for an unexpected pattern in Icelandic where a strongly inflected adjective occurs in a definite noun phrase. It is argued that, in this case, the adjective is not c-commanded by the definite article, but, in fact, merged outside DP. This rather unorthodox assumption motivated on morpho-syntactic grounds makes a number of syntactic and semantic predictions. In particular, adjectives that are merged outside DP are expected to modify not simply an NP (of type \({<}\hbox {e,t}{>}\)), but actually a referential expression/an individual of type e. The discussion of four instances of that strongly inflected pattern—appositives, expressives, positional predicates and little partitives—provides various kinds of evidence and shows that these expectations are indeed borne out.

Keywords

Adjectival inflection Icelandic Definiteness Appositives Conventional implicatures Part-whole modifiers Agreement domain 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2001. Adjective syntax and noun raising: Word order asymmetries in the DP as the result of adjective distribution. Studia Linguistica 55 (3): 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexiadou, Artemis. 2012. On the syntactic reality of restrictive adjectival modification, talk given at the Workshop on Semantic and Pragmatic Properties of (Non-) Restrictivity. University of Stuttgart, 19–20 March 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Alexiadou, Artemis, and Chris Wilder. 1998. Adjectival modification and multiple determiners. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the DP, ed. Artemis Alexiadou, and Chris Wilder, 303–332. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, S.R. 1969. An outline of the phonology of modern Icelandic vowels. Foundations of Language 5 (1): 53–72.Google Scholar
  6. Árnason, Kristján. 1980. Íslensk málfræði. Kennslubók handa framhaldsskólum. Fyrri hluti. Reykjavík: Iðunn.Google Scholar
  7. Árnason, Kristján. 1983. Íslensk málfræði. Kennslubók handa framhaldsskólum. Seinni hluti, 2nd ed. Reykjavík: Iðunn.Google Scholar
  8. Bjorkman, Bronwyn, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2014. Upward agree is superior. Ms., available at http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/002350.
  9. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. R. Martin, D. Michaels, and J. Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1993. The internal structure of noun phrases in the Scandinavian languages. PhD diss, University of Lund.Google Scholar
  12. Gallmann, Peter. 1998. Case underspecification in morphology, syntax and the lexicon. In Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase, eds. Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder, 141–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In MIT working papers in linguistics 30, eds. Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang and Martha McGinnis, 425–449.Google Scholar
  14. Halle, Morris, and Alex Marantz. 1993. Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from building 20, eds. Kenneth Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Harðarson, Gísli Rúnar. 2016. Cycling through grammar on compounds, noun phrases and domains compounds, noun phrases and domains. PhD diss, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  16. Heim, Irene, and Angelika Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Ingason, Anton Karl. 2016. Realizing morphemes in the Icelandic noun phrase. PhD diss, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  18. Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar syntax: A study of phrase structure. Linguistic inquiry monograph no. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Julien, Marit. 2002. Determiners and word order in Scandinavian DPs. Studia Linguistica 56 (3): 265–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal phrases from a Scandinavian perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kayne, Richard. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kester, Ellen Petra. 1993. The inflectional properties of Scandinavian adjectives. Studia Linguistica 47 (2): 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kiparsky, Paul. 1973. ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In A festschrift for Morris Halle, eds. Paul Kiparsky and Steven Anderson. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  24. Leffel, Timothy James. 2014. The semantics of modification: Adjectives, nouns, and order. PhD diss, New York University.Google Scholar
  25. Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. PhD diss, New York University.Google Scholar
  26. Lohrmann, Susanne. 2008. On the structure of the Scandinavian DP. In Sinspec (1), ed. Florian Schäfer. Working Papers of the SFB 732, Stuttgart. Working Papers of the SFB 732, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  27. Lohrmann, Susanne. 2010. The structure of the DP and its reflex in Scandinavian. PhD diss, University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  28. Magnússon, Friðrík. 1984. Um innri gerð nafnliða í íslensku. Íslenskt mál 6: 81–111.Google Scholar
  29. Morzycki, Marcin. 2008. Nonrestrictive modifiers in nonparenthetical positions. In Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, ed. Louise McNally, and Chris Kennedy, 101–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Norris, Mark. 2012. Towards an analysis of concord (in Icelandic). In Proceedings of the 29th west coast conference on formal linguistics (WCCFL), eds. J. Choi, E.A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz and A. Trueman, 205–213. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  31. Norris, Mark, Line Mikkelsen, and Jorge Hankamer. 2013. Licensing trouble. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 617–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Núria, Martí Girbau. 2003. Partitives: One or two nouns. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 45–58.Google Scholar
  33. Orešnik, Janez. 1972. On the epenthesis rule in modern Icelandic. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 87: 1–32.Google Scholar
  34. Partee, Barbara H. 1975. Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6 (2): 203–300.Google Scholar
  35. Pfaff, Alexander. 2007. Tvennt en samt eitt. Ákveðinn greinir í íslensku. BA thesis, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
  36. Pfaff, Alexander. 2009. Structural relations between free and suffixed articles in Icelandic. Master’s thesis, University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
  37. Pfaff, Alexander. 2014. Inside and outside—Before and after. Weak and strong adjectives in Icelandic. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, eds. Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde, and Harry Perridon, 217–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  38. Pfaff, Alexander. 2015. Adjectival and genitival modification in definite noun phrases in Icelandic – a tale of outsiders and inside jobs. PhD diss, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  39. Piñón, Christopher. 2005. Comments on Morzycki & Katz. Ms., available at http://pinon.sdf-eu.org/covers/cmk.html.
  40. Potts, Chris. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Potts, Chris. 2007a. The centrality of expressive indices. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 255–268.Google Scholar
  42. Potts, Chris. 2007b. Conventional implicatures, a distinguished class of meanings. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, ed. Gillian Ramchand, and Charles Reiss, 475–501. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Roehrs, Dorian. 2006. The morpho-syntax of the Germanic noun phrase: Determiners move into the determiner phrase. PhD diss, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  44. Roehrs, Dorian. 2009. Demonstratives and definite articles as nominal auxiliaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roehrs, Dorian, and Marit Julien. 2014. Adjectives in German and Norwegian. Differences in weak and strong inflection. In Adjectives in Germanic and Romance, eds. Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde, and Harry Perridon, 245–261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  46. Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1984. Af lýsingarorðsviðurlögum. Íslenskt mál 6: 57–80.Google Scholar
  47. Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2009. Agreement, dominance and doubling: The morphosyntax of DP. PhD diss, Leiden University.Google Scholar
  48. Schoorlemmer, Erik. 2012. Definiteness marking in Germanic: Morphological variations on the same syntactic theme. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15 (2): 107–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Selkirk, E.O. 1977. Some remarks on noun phrase structure. In Formal syntax, ed. P.W. Culicover, T. Wasow, and A. Akmajian, 285–316. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  50. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1993. The structure of the Icelandic NP. Studia Linguistica 47 (2): 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 2006. The Icelandic noun phrase. Central traits. Arkiv för nordisk filologi 121: 193–236.Google Scholar
  52. Sproat, Richar, and Chilin Shih. 1991. The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary approaches to language. Essays in honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, eds. C. Georgopoulos and R. Ishihara, 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  53. Sternefeld, Wolfgang. 2006. Syntax: Eine morphologisch motivierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen, vol. 2. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
  54. Svenonius, Peter. 2006. The emergence of axial parts. In Nordlyd, Tromsø working papers in language and linguistics: 33.1, special issue on adpositions, eds. Peter Svenonius and Marina Pantcheva, 49–77. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  55. Svenonius, Peter. 2010. Spatial P in English. In Mapping spatial PPs: The cartography of syntactic structures, eds. Guglielmo Cinque and Luigi Rizzi, Vol. 6, 127–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2001. Íslensk setningafræði. Couse manuscript, University of Iceland. http://notendur.hi.is//~hoski/islensksetn.html.
  57. Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2005. Setningar. Handbók um setningafræði. Íslensk tunga III. Almenna bókfélagið: Reykjavík.Google Scholar
  58. Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Travis, Lisa, and Greg Lamontagne. 1992. The case filter and licensing of empty K. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 37 (2): 157–174.Google Scholar
  60. Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1999a. A configurational approach to interpretation. Ms., University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  61. Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 1999b. ‘Identification’ and the role of morphology in the Scandinavian noun phrase. Ms., University of Bergen.Google Scholar
  62. Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander. 2004. Rolling up the Scandinavian noun phrase. Ms., University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
  63. Wiltschko, Martina. 2011. Descriptive relative clauses in Austro-Bavarian German. Ms., University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  64. Wiltschko, Martina. 2012. What does it take to host a (restrictive) relative clause? Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle 21(2): 100–145.Google Scholar
  65. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2011. On agree and merge. Ms., University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  66. Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. The merge condition: A syntactic approach to selection. In Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, ed. Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork, and Lilia Schürcks, 139–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  67. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29: 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ILOS/University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.CASTL-Fish/University of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations