Lexical variation and Negative Concord in Traditional Dialects of British English

  • Susagna TubauEmail author
Original Paper


In the present paper I investigate, from a Minimalist perspective and using data from the Freiburg English Dialect corpus, the patterns of Negative Concord (NC) attested in different Traditional Dialects of British English. By arguing that lexical variation exists in the negative operator used to express sentential negation, which is truly semantic in Standard English but carries an interpretable negative feature in Traditional Dialects of British English, I explain why NC, understood as syntactic Agree between [iNeg] and [uNeg] features, is attested in the latter but not in the former. In the same vein, by arguing that in Traditional Dialects of British English two lexical entries are possible for n-words which contrast in the interpretability of the negative feature they carry ([iNeg] vs. [uNeg]), the optionality of NC in the studied Non-Standard dialects of English as well as the different patterns observed in the data can be accounted for.


Negative Concord Lexical variation Negative quantifiers N-words Standard English Traditional Dialects of British English 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acquaviva, Paolo. 1997. The logical form of negation: A study of operator-variable structures in syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  2. Adger, David, and Jennifer Smith. 2010. Variation in agreement: A lexical feature-based approach. Lingua 120: 1109–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in Non-Standard British English. Gaps, regularizations and asymmetries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2005. Negative Concord in British English dialects. In Aspects of English negation, ed. Yoko Iyeiri, 113–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beal, Joan C. 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Real English: The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles, ed. James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, 187–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Beal, Joan C., and Karen P. Corrigan. 2005. No, nay, never: Negation in Tyneside English. In Aspects of English negation, ed. Yoko Iyeiri, 139–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosque, Ignacio. 1980. Sobre la negación. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.Google Scholar
  9. Bowers, John. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591–656.Google Scholar
  10. Chambers, Jack K., and Peter Trudgill. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheshire, Jenny. 1998. English negation from an interactional perspective. In The sociolinguistics reader. Vol. 1: Multilingualism and variation, ed. Peter Trudgill, and Jenny Cheshire, 127–144. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  12. Cheshire, Jenny, Vivian Edwards, and Pamela Whittle. 1993. Non-standard English and dialect levelling. In Real English: The grammar of English dialects in the British Isles, ed. James Milroy, and Lesley Milroy, 53–96. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Citko, Barbara. 2005. On the nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 475–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Citko, Barbara. 2011. Multidominance. In Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism, ed. Cedric Boeckx, 96–118. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. de Swart, Henriëtte, and Ivan Sag. 2002. Negation and negative concord in Romance. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 373–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de Vries, Mark. 2005. Merge: Properties and boundary conditions. Linguistics in the Netherlands 22: 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. de Vries, Mark. 2009. On multidominance and linearization. Biolinguistics 3: 344–403.Google Scholar
  20. den Dikken, Marcel, Richard Larson, and Peter Ludlow. 1997. Intensional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation. Ms., SUNY STONY. Accessed 17 Oct 2014.
  21. den Dikken, Marcel, André Meinunger, and Chris Wilder. 2000. Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 54: 49–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Déprez, Viviane. 1997. Two types of Negative Concord. Probus 9: 103–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Déprez, Viviane. 2000. Parallel (a)symmetries and the internal structure of negative expressions. Natural Language and Linguistics Theory 18: 253–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Déprez, Viviane. 2011. Atoms of negation: An outside-in micro-parametric approach to Negative Concord. In The evolution of negation: Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, ed. Pierre Larrivée, and Richard Ingham, 221–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  25. Espinal, M. Teresa. 2000. On the semantic status of N-words in Catalan and Spanish. Lingua 110: 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Espinal, M. Teresa. 2007. Licensing expletive negation and Negative Concord in Catalan and Spanish. In La négation dans les langues romanes, Linguisticae Investigationes Supplementa 26, ed. Franck Floricic, 49–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Espinal, M. Teresa, and Susagna Tubau. To appear. Meaning of words, meaning of sentences. Building the meaning of n-words. In Grammatical interfaces in Romance linguistics, eds. Susann Fischer and Christoph Gabriel. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1998. Polarity sensitivity as (non)veridical dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 367–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2000. Negative…concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2006. N-words and Negative Concord. In The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. Martin Everaert, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 327–391. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giannakidou, Anastasia. 1997. The landscape of polarity items. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
  33. Haegeman, Liliane. 1995. The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Haegeman, Liliane, and Raffaella Zanuttini. 1991. Negative heads and the Neg criterion. The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heim, Irene. 1987. Where does the definiteness restriction apply? Evidence from the definiteness of variables. In The representation of (in)definiteness, Vol. 14 of Current studies in linguistics series, ed. Eric J. Reuland, and Alice G.B. ter Meulen, 21–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Herburger, Elena. 2001. The Negative Concord puzzle revisited. Natural Language Semantics 9: 289–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Iatridou, Sabine. 1990. About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry 21: 551–577.Google Scholar
  39. Iatridou, Sabine, and Ivy Sichel. 2011. Negative DPs, A-movement, and scope diminishment. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 595–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ingham, Richard. 2007. NegP and negated constituent movement in the history of English. Transactions of the Philological Society 105: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacobs, Joachim. 1980. Lexical decomposition in Montague Grammar. Theoretical Linguistics 7: 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jespersen, Otto. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  43. Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 9: 577–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In The structure of language. Readings in the philosophy of language, ed. Jerry A. Fodor, and Jerrold J. Katz, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  45. Labelle, Marie, and M. Teresa Espinal. 2014. Diachronic changes in negative expressions: The case of French. Lingua 145: 194–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48: 773–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ladusaw, William. 1992. Expressing negation. In Proceedings of SALT 2, eds. Chris Baker and David Dowty, 237–259. Columbus: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  48. Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: On the nature of functional categories and projections. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  49. Lucas, Christopher, and David Willis. 2012. Never again: The multiple grammaticalization of never as a marker of negation in English. English Language and Linguistics 16: 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 69–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Milsark, Gary. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
  52. Penka, Doris. 2007. Negative indefinites. Ph.D. dissertation, Karl-Eberhards Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
  53. Penka, Doris. 2011. Negative indefinites. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Penka, Doris, and Hedde Zeijlstra. 2010. Negation and polarity: An introduction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 771–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pesetsky, David, and Esther Torrego. 2007. The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation, ed. Simin Karimi, Vida Samilian, and Wendy Wilkins, 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
  57. Potts, Chris. 2000. When even ‘no’’s neg is splittsville. Jorge Hankamer’s Webfest. Accessed 25 Sept 2014.
  58. Puskás, Genoveva. 2012. Licensing double negation in NC and non-NC languages. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30: 611–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rullman, Hotze. 1995. Geen einheid. Tabu 25: 191–198.Google Scholar
  61. Sauerland, Uli. 2000. No ‘no’: On the crosslinguistic absence of a determiner ‘no’. In Proceedings of Tsukuba workshop on determiners and quantification, ed. Uli Sauerland, 415–444. Tsukuba: Tsukuba University.Google Scholar
  62. Temmerman, Tanja. 2012. Multidominance, ellipsis, and quantifier scope. Ph.D. dissertation, LOT, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  63. Tottie, Gunnel. 1991. Negation in English speech and writing: A study in variation. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  64. Trudgill, Peter. 1990. The Dialects of England, 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Trudgill, Peter. 1999. The Dialects of England, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Tubau, Susagna. 2015. ‘Neither’, ‘(n)or nothing’ and ‘hardly’ in Negative Concord constructions in Traditional Dialects of British English. Sintagma. Revista de Lingüística 27: 7–24.Google Scholar
  67. Tubau, Susagna, and Richard Ingham. 2015. Some historical notes on English negation: unethes, almost and hardly. In Studies in linguistic variation and change: From Old to Middle English, ed. Fabienne Toupin, and Brian Lowrey, 215–226. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  68. van Riemsdijk, Henk C. 2006. Grafts follow from Merge. In Phases of interpretation, ed. Mara Frascarelli, 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zanuttini, Raffaella. 1991. Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of Romance languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  70. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  71. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2009. On French negation. Ms. UvA. Accessed 23 Oct 2014.
  72. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2011. On the syntactically complex status of negative indefinites. Journal of Comparative Linguistics 14: 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2012. There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review 29(3): 491–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations