Double auxiliaries, anteriority and terminativity

Original Paper

Abstract

In this work I analyze a construction containing an additional past participle auxiliary in Romance and German dialects and show that, although apparently similar, the semantic value of the additional auxiliary is different in the two sets of dialects: in German it is an index of terminativity, in Romance of anteriority. However, an implicational scale ruling the distribution of the additional auxiliary which goes from unergative to passive verbs (going through unaccusative verbs) is valid across all dialects shows that there is a strict relation between the two auxiliaries have and be which can be captured in terms of incorporation of a preposition/determiner as proposed by Kayne.

Keywords

Auxiliary distribution Past participle syntax Romance and German dialects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbiers, S., O. Koeneman, and M. Lekakou. 2008. Syntactic doubling and the structure of chains. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, eds. C.B. Chang, and H.J. Haynie, 77–86. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
  2. Benincà, P. 1989. Friaulisch. In Lexikon der Romanistischen linguistik, vol 3, eds. G. Holtus, M. Metzeltin, and Ch. Schmitt, 563–585. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  3. Benincà, P., and C. Poletto. 2006. Phrasal verbs in Venetan and Regional Italian. In Language Variation—European Perspectives, ed. M. von Ostendoorp, 9–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  4. Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cinque, G. 2004. Restructuring and functional structure. In Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 3, ed. A. Belletti, 132–191. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Giorgi, A., and F. Pianesi. 1991. Towards a syntax of temporal representation. Probus 3: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giorgi, A., and F. Pianesi. 1997. Tense and Aspect: From semantics to morphosyntax. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kayne, R. 1993. Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Poletto, C. 2007. Syntactic encoding of Aspect in some Northern Italian dialects. In Tiempos compuestos y formas verbales complejas chapter 11, ed. A. Carrasco. Frankfurt-Madrid: Vervuert-Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
  10. Roberts, I., and A. Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Language ScienceUniversity of Venice—CNR PaduaVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations