Neural assemblies revealed by inferred connectivity-based models of prefrontal cortex recordings
- 586 Downloads
We present two graphical model-based approaches to analyse the distribution of neural activities in the prefrontal cortex of behaving rats. The first method aims at identifying cell assemblies, groups of synchronously activating neurons possibly representing the units of neural coding and memory. A graphical (Ising) model distribution of snapshots of the neural activities, with an effective connectivity matrix reproducing the correlation statistics, is inferred from multi-electrode recordings, and then simulated in the presence of a virtual external drive, favoring high activity (multi-neuron) configurations. As the drive increases groups of neurons may activate together, and reveal the existence of cell assemblies. The identified groups are then showed to strongly coactivate in the neural spiking data and to be highly specific of the inferred connectivity network, which offers a sparse representation of the correlation pattern across neural cells. The second method relies on the inference of a Generalized Linear Model, in which spiking events are integrated over time by neurons through an effective connectivity matrix. The functional connectivity matrices inferred with the two approaches are compared. Sampling of the inferred GLM distribution allows us to study the spatio-temporal patterns of activation of neurons within the identified cell assemblies, particularly their activation order: the prevalence of one order with respect to the others is weak and reflects the neuron average firing rates and the strength of the largest effective connections. Other properties of the identified cell assemblies (spatial distribution of coactivation events and firing rates of coactivating neurons) are discussed.
KeywordsCell assemblies Replay Statistical inference Ising model Generalized linear model
This work is a follow-up of a previous study in collaboration with F.P. Battaglia and U. Ferrari (Tavoni et al. 2015), to whom we are very grateful.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Abbeel, P., Koller D., Ng A.Y. (2006) Learning factor graphs in polynomial time and sample complexity. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 7: 1743–1788.Google Scholar
- Barton, J.P., De Leonardis E., Coucke A., Cocco S. (2016) Ace: adaptive cluster expansion for maximum entropy graphical model inference. Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw328.
- Chandler, D. (1987) Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Ganmor, E., Segev R., Schneidman E. (2009) How fast can we learn maximum entropy models of neural populations In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, volume 197, page 012020.Google Scholar
- Ganmor, E., Segev R., Schneidman E. (2011a) The architecture of functional interaction networks in the retina. The Journal of Neuroscience 31 (8): 3044–3054.Google Scholar
- Ganmor, E., Segev R., Schneidman E. (2011b) Sparse low-order interaction network underlies a highly correlated and learnable neural population code. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (23): 9679–9684.Google Scholar
- Gerwinn, S., Macke J., Bethge M. (2010) Bayesian inference for generalized linear models for spiking neurons. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience: 4:12:1–17.Google Scholar
- Hebb, D.O. (1949) The organization of behavior: A neurophysiological theory. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, K.L., McNaughton B.L. (2002) Coordinated reactivation of distributed memory traces in primate neocortex. Science 297 (5589): 2070–2073.Google Scholar
- Peyrache, A., Benchenane K., Khamassi M., Wiener S., Battaglia F. (2010a) Sequential reinstatement of neocortical activity during slow oscillations depends on cells’ global activity. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 3: 18.Google Scholar
- Peyrache, A., Benchenane K., Khamassi M., Wiener S.I., Battaglia F.P. (2010b) Principal component analysis of ensemble recordings reveals cell assemblies at high temporal resolution. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 29 (1-2): 309–325.Google Scholar
- Pfeiffer, B.E., Foster D.J. (2013) Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature 497 (7447): 74–79.Google Scholar
- Shlens, J. (2014) Notes on generalized linear models of neurons. arXiv:http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1999.
- Singh, A., Peyrache A., Humphries M. (2015) Task learning reveals signatures of sample-based internal models in rodent prefrontal cortex. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/027102.
- Tavoni, G., Ferrari U., Battaglia F.P., Cocco S., Monasson R. (2015) Functional coupling networks inferred from prefrontal cortex activity show learning-related effective plasticity. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/028316.
- Tkaċik, G., Marre O., Amodei D., Schneidman E., Bialek W., Berry II M.J. (2014) Searching for collective behavior in a large network of sensory neurons. Plos Computational Biology.Google Scholar