Responses of a bursting pacemaker to excitation reveal spatial segregation between bursting and spiking mechanisms
- 213 Downloads
Central pattern generators (CPGs) frequently include bursting neurons that serve as pacemakers for rhythm generation. Phase resetting curves (PRCs) can provide insight into mechanisms underlying phase locking in such circuits. PRCs were constructed for a pacemaker bursting complex in the pyloric circuit in the stomatogastric ganglion of the lobster and crab. This complex is comprised of the Anterior Burster (AB) neuron and two Pyloric Dilator (PD) neurons that are all electrically coupled. Artificial excitatory synaptic conductance pulses of different strengths and durations were injected into one of the AB or PD somata using the Dynamic Clamp. Previously, we characterized the inhibitory PRCs by assuming a single slow process that enabled synaptic inputs to trigger switches between an up state in which spiking occurs and a down state in which it does not. Excitation produced five different PRC shapes, which could not be explained with such a simple model. A separate dendritic compartment was required to separate the mechanism that generates the up and down phases of the bursting envelope (1) from synaptic inputs applied at the soma, (2) from axonal spike generation and (3) from a slow process with a slower time scale than burst generation. This study reveals that due to the nonlinear properties and compartmentalization of ionic channels, the response to excitation is more complex than inhibition.
KeywordsCentral pattern generator Dynamic clamp Phase response curve Phase locking Stomatogastric ganglion
This work was supported by NIH grant NS054281 under the CRCNS program. We thank Ryan Hooper for supplying some of the PRCs and Rob Butera for comments on an earlier draft.
- Arshavsky, Y. I., Deliagina, T. G., Orlovsky, G. N., & Panchin, Y. V. (1989). Control of feeding movements in the pteropod mollusk, clione-limacina. Experimental Brain Research, 78, 387–397.Google Scholar
- Arshavsky, Y. I., Grillner, S., Orlovsky, G. N., & Panchin, Y. V. (1991). Central generators and the spatiotemporal pattern of movements. In J. Fagard & P. H. Wolff (Eds.), The development of timing control and temporal organization in coordinated action: Invariant relative timing, rhythms, and coordination (pp. 93–115). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Calabrese, R. L., & Peterson, E. L. (1983). Neural control of heartbeat in the leech, hirudo medicinalis. In A. Roberts & B. Roberts (Eds.), Neural origin of rhythmic movements (pp. 195–221). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
- Demir S. S., Butera, R. J. Jr., DeFranceschi A. A., Clark, J. W. Jr., & Byrne J. H. (1997). Phase Sensitivity and Entrainment in a Modeled Bursting Neuron. Biophysical Journal, 72, 579–594.Google Scholar
- Prinz, A. A., Thirumalai, V., & Marder, E. (2003b). The functional consequences of changes in the strength and duration of synaptic inputs to oscillatory neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 943–954.Google Scholar
- Rinzel, J., & Ermentrout, B. (1989). Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations. In C. Koch & I. Segev (Eds.), Methods in neuronal modelling: From synapses to networks". Cambridge: MIT. revised 1998.Google Scholar
- Stein, S. G., Grillner, S., Selverston, A. I., & Stuart, D. G., (Eds). (1997). Neurons, networks, and motor behavior. MIT.Google Scholar
- Winfree, A. T. (1980). The geometry of biological time. New York: Springer.Google Scholar