Sensitivity of firing rate to input fluctuations depends on time scale separation between fast and slow variables in single neurons
- 659 Downloads
Neuronal responses are often characterized by the firing rate as a function of the stimulus mean, or the f–I curve. We introduce a novel classification of neurons into Types A, B−, and B+ according to how f–I curves are modulated by input fluctuations. In Type A neurons, the f–I curves display little sensitivity to input fluctuations when the mean current is large. In contrast, Type B neurons display sensitivity to fluctuations throughout the entire range of input means. Type B− neurons do not fire repetitively for any constant input, whereas Type B+ neurons do. We show that Type B+ behavior results from a separation of time scales between a slow and fast variable. A voltage-dependent time constant for the recovery variable can facilitate sensitivity to input fluctuations. Type B+ firing rates can be approximated using a simple “energy barrier” model.
KeywordsNoise Gain f–I curve Stimulus fluctuations Single neuron Time scales Dynamical systems Phase portrait Hodgkin-Huxley Slow adaptation Slow AHP
We thank Bard Ermentrout for helpful conversations during initial stages of the project at the Marine Biological Laboratory’s Methods in Computational Neuroscience 2007 course, Matthew Higgs and Michele Giugliano for helpful discussions and providing data for a figure, and Randy Powers and Sungho Hong for comments on a draft of this manuscript.
This work was supported by a Burroughs-Wellcome Careers at the Scientific Interface grant and a McKnight Scholar Award; BNL was supported by grant number F30NS055650 from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Medical Scientist Training Program at UW supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and an ARCS fellowship; WJS was supported by a VA Merit Review.
Conceived of, designed, and performed the simulations: BL. Analyzed the data: BL MF LS AF. Wrote the paper: BL MF WS AF. Developed the conceptual framework: BL MF LS WS AF.
- Arfken, G. B., & Weber, H. -J. (1995). Mathematical methods for physicists (4th ed.). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
- Arsiero, M., Luscher, H. R., Lundstrom, B. N., & Giugliano, M. (2007). The impact of input fluctuations on the frequency-current relationships of layer 5 pyramidal neurons in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 3274–3284. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4937-06.2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience : Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
- Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002). Spiking neuron models : Single neurons, populations, plasticity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Izhikevich, E. M. (2007). Dynamical systems in neuroscience : The geometry of excitability and bursting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Koch, C. (1999). Biophysics of computation: information processing in single neurons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Prescott, S. A., Ratte, S., De Koninck, Y., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2006). Nonlinear interaction between shunting and adaptation controls a switch between integration and coincidence detection in pyramidal neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 9084–9097. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1388-06.2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rinzel, J., & Ermentrout, B. (1998). Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations. In C. Koch, I. Segev, & (Eds.), (pp. 251–291, 2nd ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Strogatz, S. H. (1994). Nonlinear dynamics and Chaos: with applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar