Compartmental neural simulations with spatial adaptivity

  • Michael J. Rempe
  • Nelson Spruston
  • William L. Kath
  • David L. ChoppEmail author


Since their inception, computational models have become increasingly complex and useful counterparts to laboratory experiments within the field of neuroscience. Today several software programs exist to solve the underlying mathematical system of equations, but such programs typically solve these equations in all parts of a cell (or network of cells) simultaneously, regardless of whether or not all of the cell is active. This approach can be inefficient if only part of the cell is active and many simulations must be performed. We have previously developed a numerical method that provides a framework for spatial adaptivity by making the computations local to individual branches rather than entire cells (Rempe and Chopp, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28: 2139–2161, 2006). Once the computation is reduced to the level of branches instead of cells, spatial adaptivity is straightforward: the active regions of the cell are detected and computational effort is focused there, while saving computations in other regions of the cell that are at or near rest. Here we apply the adaptive method to four realistic neuronal simulation scenarios and demonstrate its improved efficiency over non-adaptive methods. We find that the computational cost of the method scales with the amount of activity present in the simulation, rather than the physical size of the system being simulated. For certain problems spatial adaptivity reduces the computation time by up to 80%.


Compartmental models Simulations Adaptivity 



Supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF-IGERT, DGE 9987577 to MJR) and the National Institutes of Health (NS-46064 to NS, WLK, and DLC as part of the Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience Program).


  1. Amaral, D. (1993). Emerging principles of intrinsic hippocampal organization. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 3, 225–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bischofberger, J., & Jonas, P. (1997). Action potential propagation into the pre-synaptic dendrites of rat mitral cells. Journal Physiology (London), 504, 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bower, J., & Beeman, D. (1998). The Book of Genesis: Exploring realistic neural models with the GEneral NEural SImulation System. Telos: Santa Clara.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, W., Midtgaard, J., & Shepherd, G. (1997). Forward and backward propagation of dendritic impulses and their synaptic control in mitral cells. Science, 278, 463–467.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Connors, B., & Long, M. (2004). Electrical synapses in the mammalian brain. Annual Reviews Neuroscience, 27, 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukuda, T., Kosaka, T., Singer, W., & Galuske, R. (2006). Gap junctions among dendrites of cortical GABAergic neurons establish a dense and widespread intercolumnar network. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(13), 3434–3443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Golding, N., Kath, W., & Spruston, N. (2001). Dichotomy of action-potential backpropagation in CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2998–3010.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Goldstein, S., & Rall, W. (1974). Changes in action potential shape and velocity for changing core conductor geometry. Biophysical Journal, 14, 731–757.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Häusser, M., Stuart, G., Racca, C., & Sakmann, B. (1995). Axonal initiation and active dendritic propagation of action potentials in substantia nigra neurons. Neuron, 15, 637–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hines, M. (1984). Efficient computation of branched nerve equations. International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 15, 69–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (2001). NEURON: a tool for neuroscientists. The Neuroscientist, 7, 123–135.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hines, M. L., & Carnevale, N. T. (1997). The NEURON simulation environment. Neural Computation, 9, 1179–1209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodgkin, A., & Huxley, A. (1952). A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. Journal of Physiology, 117, 500–544.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hormuzdi, S., Filippov, M., Mitropoulou, G., Monyer, H., & Bruzzone, R. (2004). Electrical synapses: a dynamic signaling system that shapes the activity of neuronal networks. Biochimica Biophysica Acta, 1662, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jarsky, T., Roxin, A., Kath, W., & Spruston, N. (2005). Conditional dendritic spike propagation following distal synaptic activation of hippocampal ca1 pyramidal neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1667–1676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kopell, N., & Ermentrout, B. (2004). Chemical and electrical synapses perform complementary roles in the synchronization of interneuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(43), 15482–15487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Llinas, R., & Sugimori, M. (1980). Electrophysiological properties of in-vitro purkinje cell dendrites in mammalian cerebellar slices. Journal of Physiology (London), 305, 197–213.Google Scholar
  18. Lundqvist, M., Rehn, M., Djurfeldt, M., & Lansner, A. (2006). Attractor dynamics in a modular network model of neocortex. Network-Computation In Neural Systems, 17, 253–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Manor, Y., Rinzel, J., Segev, I., & Yarom, Y. (1997). Low-amplitude oscillations in the inferior olive: A model based on electrical coupling of neurons with heterogeneous channel densities. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 2736–2752.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Markram, H. (2006). The Blue Brain Project. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(2), 153–160.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martina, M., Vida, I., & Jonas, P. (2000). Distal initiation and active propagation of action potentials in interneuron dendrites. Science, 287, 295–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mascagni, M. (1991). A parallelizing algorithm for computing solutions to arbitrarily branched cable neuron models. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 36, 105–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Migliore, M., Cannia, C., Lytton, W. W., Markram, H., & Hines, M. L. (2006). Parallel network simulations with NEURON. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 21, 119–129.Google Scholar
  24. Rall, W (1977) Core conductor theory and cable properties of neurons. In: Handbook of physiology. The nervous system. Cellular biology of neurons, sect. 1, vol. I. Bethesda, MD: Am Physiol Soc, pp. 39–97.Google Scholar
  25. Rempe, M., & Chopp, D. (2006). A predictor-corrector algorithm for reaction-diffusion equations associated with neural activity on branched structures. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 28, 2139–2161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roxin, A., Riecke, H., & Solla, S. (2004). Self-sustained activity in a small-world network of excitable neurons. Physical Review Letters, 92(19), 198101–1981011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saraga, F., Ng, L., & Skinner, F. (2006). Distal gap junctions and active dendrites can tune network dynamics. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 1669–1682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saraga, F., & Skinner, F. (2004). Location, location, location (and density) of gap junctions in multi-compartment models. Neurocomputing, 58, 713–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skinner, F., Zhang, L., Velazquez, J. P., & Carlen, P. (1999). Bursting in inhibitory interneuronal networks: A role for gap-junctional coupling. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1274–1283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sohl, G., Maxeiner, S., & Willecke, K. (2005). Expression and function of neuronal gap junctions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 191–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stuart, G., & Häusser, M. (1994). Initiation and spread of sodium action potentials in cerebellar purkinje cells. Neuron, 13, 703–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stuart, G., Spruston, N., Sakmann, B., & Häusser, M. (1997). Action potential initiation and backpropagation in neurons of the mammalian cns. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 125–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Traub, R., & Bibbig, A. (2000). A model of high-frequency ripples in the hippocampus based on synaptic coupling plus axon-axon gap junctions between pyramidal neurons. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), 2086–2093.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Traub, R., Contreras, D., Cunningham, M., Murray, H., LeBeau, F., Roopen, A., et al. (2005). Single-column thalamocortical network model exhibiting gamma oscillations, sleep spindles, and epileptogenic bursts. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 2194–2232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Traub, R., Kopell, N., Bibbig, A., Buhl, E., LeBeau, F., & Whittington, M. (2001). Gap junctions between interneuron dendrites can enhance synchrony of gamma oscillations in distributed networks. Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23), 9478–9486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vetter, P., Roth, A., & Haüsser, M. (2000). Propagation of action potentials in dendrites depends on dendritic morphology. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 926–937.Google Scholar
  37. Zsiros, V., Aradi, I., & Maccaferri, G. (2007). Propagation of postsynaptic currents and potentials via gap junctions in GABAergic networks of the rat hippocampus. Journal of Physiology (London), 578, 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Rempe
    • 1
  • Nelson Spruston
    • 2
  • William L. Kath
    • 1
  • David L. Chopp
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Applied MathematicsNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurobiology and PhysiologyNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations