Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 262–281 | Cite as

Spike timing dependent plasticity promotes synchrony of inhibitory networks in the presence of heterogeneity

  • Sachin S. TalathiEmail author
  • Dong-Uk Hwang
  • William L. Ditto


Recently Haas et al. (J Neurophysiol 96: 3305–3313, 2006), observed a novel form of spike timing dependent plasticity (iSTDP) in GABAergic synaptic couplings in layer II of the entorhinal cortex. Depending on the relative timings of the presynaptic input at time t pre and the postsynaptic excitation at time t post, the synapse is strengthened (Δt = t post − t pre > 0) or weakened (Δt < 0). The temporal dynamic range of the observed STDP rule was found to lie in the higher gamma frequency band (≥40 Hz), a frequency range important for several vital neuronal tasks. In this paper we study the function of this novel form of iSTDP in the synchronization of the inhibitory neuronal network. In particular we consider a network of two unidirectionally coupled interneurons (UCI) and two mutually coupled interneurons (MCI), in the presence of heterogeneity in the intrinsic firing rates of each coupled neuron. Using the method of spike time response curve (STRC), we show how iSTDP influences the dynamics of the coupled neurons, such that the pair synchronizes under moderately large heterogeneity in the firing rates. Using the general properties of the STRC for a Type-1 neuron model (Ermentrout, Neural Comput 8:979–1001, 1996) and the observed iSTDP we determine conditions on the initial configuration of the UCI network that would result in 1:1 in-phase synchrony between the two coupled neurons. We then demonstrate a similar enhancement of synchrony in the MCI with dynamic synaptic modulation. For the MCI we also consider heterogeneity introduced in the network through the synaptic parameters: the synaptic decay time of mutual inhibition and the self inhibition synaptic strength. We show that the MCI exhibits enhanced synchrony in the presence of all the above mentioned sources of heterogeneity and the mechanism for this enhanced synchrony is similar to the case of the UCI.


Inhibitory synapses Spike timing dependent plasticity Synchronization Networks Heterogeneity 



This work was performed under the sponsorship of the Office of Naval Research (Grant N00014-02-1-1019) and the National Institute of Health Collaborative Research in Computational Neuroscience program (1R01EB004752).


  1. Abarbanel, H., Gibb, L., Huerta, R., & Rabinovich, M. (2003). Biophysical model of synaptic plasticity dynamics. Biological Cybernetics, 89, 214–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abarbanel, H., & Talathi, S. (2006). Neural circuitry for recognizing interspike interval sequences. Physical Review Letters, 96, 148104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acker, C., Kopell, N., & White, J. (2004). Synchronization of strongly coupled excitatory neurons: Relating network behavior to biophysics. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 15, 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benardo, L. (1997). Recruitment of GABAergic inhibition and synchronization of inhibitory interneurons in rat neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 77, 3134–3144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bragin, A., Jando, G., Nadasdy, Z., Hetke, J., Wise, K., et al. (1995). Gamma (40–100 Hz) oscillations in the hippocampus of the behaving rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 47–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Eckhorn, R., Bauer, B., Jordan, W., Brosch, M., Kruse, W., et al. (1988). Coherent oscillations: A mechanism of feature linking in the visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics, 60, 121–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ermentrout, B. (1996). Type 1 membranes, phase resetting curves and synchrony. Neural Compute, 8, 979–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ernst, U., Pawelzik, K., & Geisel, T. (1995). Synchronization induced by temporal delays in pulse-coupled oscillators. Physical Review Letters, 74, 1570–1573.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Froemke, R., & Dan, Y. (2002). Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains. Nature, 416, 433–438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gray, C., Koenig P, Engel, K., & Singer, W. (1989). Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit intercolumnar synchronization which reflect global stimulus properties. Nature, 338, 334–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haas, J., Nowotny, T., & Abarbanel, H. (2006). Spike-timing-dependent plasticity of inhibitory synapses in the entorhinal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96, 3305–3313.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jefferys, J., Traub, R., & Whittington, M. (1996). Neuronal networks for induced 40 Hz rhythms. Trends in Neuroscience, 19, 202–208.Google Scholar
  13. Kopell, N., & Ermentrout, B. (2004). Chemical and Electrical synapses perform complementary roles in the synchronization of interneuronal networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 15482–15487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kurths, J., Pikovsky, A., & Rosenblum, M. (2001). Synchronization, a universal concept in non-linear science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lacaille, J., & Williams, S. (1990). Membrane properties of interneurons in stratum oriens-alveus of the CA1 region of rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuroscience, 36, 349–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCormick, D., Connors, B., Lighthall, J., & Prince, D. (1985). Comparative electrophysiology of pyramidal and sparsely spiny stellate neurons of the neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 54, 782–806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Michelson, H., & Wong, R. (1994). Syncrhonization of inhibitory neurones in the guinea-pig hippocampus in vitro. Journal of Physiology, 477, 35–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Nowotny, T., Zhigulin, V., Selverston, A., Abarbanel, H., & Rabinovich, M. (2003). Enhancement of synchronization in hybrid neural circuit by spike timing dependent plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9776–9785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Oprisan, S., Prinz, A., & Canavier, C. (2004). Phase resetting and phase locking in hybrid circuits of one model and one biological neuron. Biophysical Journal, 87, 2283–2298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ritz, R., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). Synchronous oscillatory activity in sensory systems: New vistas on mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 536–546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sheperd, G. (1990). The synaptic organization of the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, F., Zhang, L., Velazquez, P., & Carlen, P. (1999). Bursting inhibitory interneuronal networks: A role for gap-junctional coupling. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81, 1274–1283.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Traub, R., Kopell, N., Bibbig, A., Buhl, E. H., le Beau, F., et al. (2001). Gap junctions between interneuron dendrites can enhance synchrony of gamma oscillatios. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 9478–9486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. vanVreeswijk, C., Abbott, L., & Ermentrout, B. (1994). When inhibition and not excitation synchronizes neural firing. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 1, 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, X., & Rinzel, J. (1992). Alternating and synchronous rhythms in reciprocally inhibitory model neurons. Neural Computation, 4, 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, A., Chow, C., Ritt, J., Trevino, C., & Kopell, N. (1998). Synchronization and oscillatory dynamics in heterogeneous, mutually inhibited neurons. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 5, 5–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Whittington, M., Traub, R., & Jefferys, J. (1995). Synchronized oscillations in interneuron networks driven by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation. Nature, 373, 612–615.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilkie, J. (2004). Numerical methods for stochastic differential equations. Physical Review E, 70, 017701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Woodin, M., Ganguly, K., & Poo, M. (2003). Coincident Pre- and Postsynaptic activity modifies GABAergic synapses by postsynaptic changes in Cl Transporter activity. Neuron, 39, 807–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ylinen, A., Bragin, A., Nadasdy, Z., Jando, G., Szabo, I., et al. (1995). Sharp wave-associated high-frequency oscillation (200 Hz) in the intact hippocampus: network and intracellular mechanisms. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 30–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhigulin, V., Rabinovich, M., Huerta, R., & Abarbanel, H. (2003). Robustness and enhancement of neural synchronization by activity-dependent coupling. Physical Review E, 67.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sachin S. Talathi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dong-Uk Hwang
    • 1
  • William L. Ditto
    • 1
  1. 1.J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations