Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 39–63 | Cite as

Episodic activity in a heterogeneous excitatory network, from spiking neurons to mean field

  • Boris B. Vladimirski
  • Joël Tabak
  • Michael J. O’Donovan
  • John Rinzel


Many developing neural systems exhibit spontaneous activity (O’Donovan, Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:94–104, 1999; Feller, Neuron 22:653–656, 1999) characterized by episodes of discharge (active phases) when many cells are firing, separated by silent phases during which few cells fire. Various models exhibit features of episodic behavior by means of recurrent excitation for supporting an episode and slow activity-dependent depression for terminating one. The basic mechanism has been analyzed using mean-field, firing-rate models. Firing-rate models are typically formulated ad hoc, not derived from a spiking network description, and the effects of substantial heterogeneity amongst the units are not usually considered. Here we develop an excitatory network of spiking neurons (N-cell model) with slow synaptic depression to model episodic rhythmogenesis. This N-cell model displays episodic behavior over a range of heterogeneity in bias currents. Important features of the episodic behavior include orderly recruitment of individual cells during silent phases and existence of a dynamical process whereby a small critical subpopulation of intermediate excitability conveys synaptic drive from active to silent cells. We also derive a general self-consistency equation for synaptic drive that includes cell heterogeneity explicitly. We use this mean-field description to expose the dynamical bistability that underlies episodic behavior in the heterogeneous network. In a systematic numerical study we find that the robustness of the episodic behavior improves with increasing heterogeneity. Furthermore, the heterogeneity of depression variables (imparted by the heterogeneity in cellular firing thresholds) plays an important role in this improvement: it renders the network episodic behavior more robust to variations in excitability than if depression is uniformized. We also investigate the effects of noise vs. heterogeneity on the robustness of episodic behavior, especially important for the developing nervous system. We demonstrate that noise-induced episodes are very fragile, whereas heterogeneity-produced episodic rhythm is robust.


Spontaneous rhythmic activity Spiking network Mean field Heterogeneity Dynamic range 

Supplementary material

10827_2007_64_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (375 kb)
(PDF 375 kb)


  1. Beggs, J. M., & Plenz, D. (2003). Neuronal avalanches in neocortical circuits. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 11167–11177.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Ari, Y. (2001). Developing networks play a similar melody. Trends in Neuroscience, 24, 353–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borodinsky, L. N., Root, C. M., Cronin, J., Sann, S. B., Gu, X., & Spitzer, N. C. (2004). Activity-dependent homeostatic specification of transmitter expression in embryonic neurons. Nature, 429, 523–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burden, R. L., & Faires, J. D. (2001). Numerical analysis (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  5. Cherubini, E., Gaiarsa, J. L., & Ben-Ari, Y. (1991). GABA: an excitatory transmitter in early postnatal life. Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 515–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chub, N., & O’Donovan, M. J. (1998). Blockade and recovery of spontaneous rhythmic activity after application of neurotransmitter antagonists to spinal networks of the chick embryo. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 294–306.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Compte, A., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., McCormick, D. A., & Wang, X. J. (2003). Cellular and network mechanisms of slow oscillatory activity (<1 Hz) and wave propagations in a cortical network model. Journal of Neurophysiology, 89, 2707–2725.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ermentrout, B. (1994). Reduction of conductance based models with slow synapses to neural nets. Neural Computation, 6, 679–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fedirchuk, B., Wenner, P., Whelan, P. J., Ho, S., Tabak, J., & O’Donovan, M. J. (1999). Spontaneous network activity transiently depresses synaptic transmission in the embryonic chick spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 2102–2112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Feller, M. B. (1999). Spontaneous correlated activity in developing neural circuits. Neuron, 22, 653–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giugliano, M., Darbon, P., Arsiero, M., Lüscher, H.-R., & Streit, J. (2004). Single-neuron discharge properties and network activity in dissociated cultures of neocortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 977–996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hansel, D., Mato, G., Meunier, C., & Neltner, L. (1998). On numerical simulations of integrate-and-fire neural networks. Neural Computation, 10, 467–483.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanson, M. G., & Landmesser, L. T. (2004). Normal patterns of spontaneous activity are required for correct motor axon guidance and the expression of specific guidance molecules. Neuron, 43, 687–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katz, L. C., & Shatz, C. J. (1996). Synaptic activity and the construction of cortical circuits. Science, 274, 1133–1138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Latham, P. E., Richmond, B. J., Nelson, P. G., & Nirenberg, S. (2000). Intrinsic dynamics in neuronal networks. I. Theory. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 808–827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loebel, A., & Tsodyks, M. (2002). Computation by ensemble synchronization in recurrent networks with synaptic depression. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 13, 111–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marchetti, C., Tabak, J., Chub, N., O’Donovan, M. J., & Rinzel, J. (2005). Modeling spontaneous activity in the developing spinal cord using activity-dependent variations of intracellular chloride. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3601–3612.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Donovan, M. J. (1999). The origin of spontaneous activity in developing networks of the vertebrate nervous system. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 9, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sernagor, E., Chub, N., Ritter, A., & O’Donovan, M. J. (1995). Pharmacological characterization of the rhythmic synaptic drive onto lumbosacral motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience, 15, 7452–7464.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shelley, M. J., & Tao, L. (2001). Efficient and accurate time-stepping schemes for integrate-and-fire neuronal networks. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 11, 111–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shriki, O., Hansel, D., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003). Rate models for conductance-based cortical neuronal networks. Neural Computation, 15, 1809–1841.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stellwagen, D., & Shatz, C. J. (2002). An instructive role for retinal waves in the development of retinogeniculate connectivity. Neuron, 33, 357–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Strogatz, S. H. (2000). Nonlinear dynamics and chaos: With applications to physics, biology, chemistry, and engineering. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.Google Scholar
  24. Tabak, J., O’Donovan, M. J., & Rinzel, J. (2006). Differential control of active and silent phases in relaxation models of neuronal rhythms. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 21, 307–328.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabak, J., Rinzel, J., & O’Donovan, M. J. (2001). The role of activity-dependent network depression in the expression and self-regulation of spontaneous activity in the developing spinal cord. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8966–8978.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tabak, J., Senn, W., O’Donovan, M. J., & Rinzel, J. (2000). Modeling of spontaneous activity in developing spinal cord using activity-dependent depression in an excitatory network. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3041–3056.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Timofeev, I., Grenier, F., Bazhenov, M., Sejnowski, T. J., & Steriade, M. (2000). Origin of slow cortical oscillations in deafferented cortical slabs. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 1185–1199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsodyks, M., Uziel, A., & Markram, H. (2000). Synchrony generation in recurrent networks with frequency-dependent synapses. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(RC50), 1–5.Google Scholar
  29. van Vreeswijk, C., & Hansel, D. (2001). Patterns of synchrony in neural networks with spike adaptation. Neural Computation, 13, 959–992.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vladimirski, B. B. (2005). Modeling and analysis of spontaneous electrical episodic activity in the developing nervous system by means of a heterogeneous excitatory network of spiking neurons with slow synaptic depression and reduced mean-field models. Ph.D. diss., New York University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  31. Wenner, P., & O’Donovan, M. (2001). Mechanisms that initiate spontaneous network activity in the developing chick spinal cord. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 1481–1498.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiedemann, U. A., & Lüthi, A. (2003). Timing of network synchronization by refractory mechanisms. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90, 3902–3911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972). Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. Biophysical Journal, 12, 1–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yvon, C., Czarnecki, A., & Streit, J. (2007). Riluzole-induced oscillations in spinal networks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3607–3620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris B. Vladimirski
    • 1
    • 2
  • Joël Tabak
    • 4
  • Michael J. O’Donovan
    • 5
  • John Rinzel
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Courant Institute of Mathematical SciencesNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of BernBernSwitzerland
  3. 3.Center for Neural ScienceNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biological ScienceFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.Developmental Neurobiology SectionNINDS, NIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations