Optimality, stochasticity, and variability in motor behavior
- 181 Downloads
Recent theories of motor control have proposed that the nervous system acts as a stochastically optimal controller, i.e. it plans and executes motor behaviors taking into account the nature and statistics of noise. Detrimental effects of noise are converted into a principled way of controlling movements. Attractive aspects of such theories are their ability to explain not only characteristic features of single motor acts, but also statistical properties of repeated actions. Here, we present a critical analysis of stochastic optimality in motor control which reveals several difficulties with this hypothesis. We show that stochastic control may not be necessary to explain the stochastic nature of motor behavior, and we propose an alternative framework, based on the action of a deterministic controller coupled with an optimal state estimator, which relieves drawbacks of stochastic optimality and appropriately explains movement variability.
KeywordsMotor control Noise Model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Atkeson, C., & Hollerbach, J. (1967). Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements. Journal of Neuroscience, 5(9), 2318–2330.Google Scholar
- Bernstein, N. (1967). The Co-ordination and regulation of movements. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Bryson, A. (1999). Dynamic optimization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bryson, A., & Ho, YC. (1975). Applied optimal control – Optimization, estimation, and control. New York: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, G., & Sin, K. (1984). Adaptive filtering prediction and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Gordon, J., Ghilardi, M., Cooper, S., & Ghez, C. (1994b). Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Experimental Brain Research, 99(1), 112–130.Google Scholar
- Li, W. (2006). Optimal control for biological movement systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
- Pélisson, D., Prablanc, C., Goodale, M., & Jeannerod, M. (1986). Visual control of reaching movements without vision of the limb. II. Evidence of fast unconscious processes correcting the trajectory of the hand to the final position of a double-step stimulus. Experimental Brain Research, 62(2), 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Todorov, E., & Li, W. (2005). A generalized iterative LQG method for locally-optimal feedback control of constrained nonlinear stochastic systems. In: Proc American Control Conference (pp. 300–306).Google Scholar