Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 79–111 | Cite as

A novel approach to the detection of synchronisation in EEG based on empirical mode decomposition

  • C. M. Sweeney-ReedEmail author
  • S. J. Nasuto


Transient neural assemblies mediated by synchrony in particular frequency ranges are thought to underlie cognition. We propose a new approach to their detection, using empirical mode decomposition (EMD), a data-driven approach removing the need for arbitrary bandpass filter cut-offs. Phase locking is sought between modes. We explore the features of EMD, including making a quantitative assessment of its ability to preserve phase content of signals, and proceed to develop a statistical framework with which to assess synchrony episodes. Furthermore, we propose a new approach to ensure signal decomposition using EMD. We adapt the Hilbert spectrum to a time-frequency representation of phase locking and are able to locate synchrony successfully in time and frequency between synthetic signals reminiscent of EEG. We compare our approach, which we call EMD phase locking analysis (EMDPL) with existing methods and show it to offer improved time-frequency localisation of synchrony.


EEG Time-frequency Coherence Phase synchrony Empirical mode decomposition 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andrade A, Kyberd PJ, Taffler SD (2003) A novel spectral representation of electromyographic signals. In: Leder RS ed. Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society—25th Annual International Conference. Cancun, Mexico, pp. 2598–2601.Google Scholar
  2. Balocchi R, Menicucci D, Santarcangelo E, Sebastiani L, Gemignani A, Ghelarducci B, Varanini M (2004) Deriving the respiratory sinus arrhythmia from the heartbeat time series using empirical mode decomposition. Chaos Solitons Fractals 20: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bear M, Connors B, Paradiso M (2001) Neuroscience: Exploring the Brain, 2nd edn. Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  4. Bendat J, Piersol A (1986) The Hilbert transform. In: Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 484–516.Google Scholar
  5. Bernat E, Williams W, Gehring W (2005) Decomposing ERP time-frequency energy using PCA. Clin. Neurophysiol. 116: 1314–1334.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breakspear M, Williams LM, Stam CJ (2004) A novel method for the topographic analysis of neural activity reveals formation and dissolution of “dynamic cell assemblies”. J. Comput. Neurosci. 16(1): 49–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bressler SL, Coppola R, Nakamura R (1993) Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance. Nature 366(6451): 153–156.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruns A (2004). Fourier-, Hilbert-, and wavelet-based signal analysis: Are they really different approaches? J. Neurosci. Methods 137: 321–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bullmor E, Fadili J, Maxim V, Sendur L, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Brammer M, Breakspear M (2004) Wavelets and functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 23(Suppl 1): S234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter GC (1987) Coherence and time delay estimation. Proc. IEEE 75(2): 236–255.Google Scholar
  11. Chatfield C (1996). The Analysis of Time Series. An Introduction, 5th edn. Texts in Statistical Science. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  12. Daubechies I (1992). Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM). Philadelphia, PA, USA.Google Scholar
  13. David O, Cosmelli D, Friston K (2004) Evaluation of different measures of functional connectivity using a neural mass model. Neuroimage 21: 659–673.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David O, Cosmelli D, Lachaux J-P, Baillet S, Garnero L, Martinerie J (2002) A theoretical and experimental introduction to the non-invasive study of large-scale neural phase synchronization in human beings (invited paper). Int. J. Comput. Cogn. 1(4): 53–77.Google Scholar
  15. Deering R, Kaiser J (2005) The use of a masking signal to improve empirical mode decomposition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 4, pp. 485–489.Google Scholar
  16. Destexhe A, Contreras D, Steriade M (1999) Spatiotemporal analysis of local field potentials and unit discharges in cat cerebral cortex during natural wake and sleep states. J. Neurosci. Methods 19: 4595–4608.Google Scholar
  17. Dringenberg H, Diavolitsis P (2002) Electroencephalographic activation by fluoxetine in rats: Role of 5-HT receptors and enhancement of concurrent acetylcholinesterase inhibitor treatment. Neuropharmacology 42: 154–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farge M (1992) Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24: 395–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flandrin P, Rilling G, Goncalves P (2004) Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 11: 112–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friston K, Stephan K, Frackowiak R (1997) Transient phase-locking and dynamic correlations: Are they the same thing? Hum Brain Mapp. 5: 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gabor D (1946) Theory of communication. J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 93: 429–457.Google Scholar
  22. Gray C (1999) The temporal correlation hypothesis of visual feature integration: Still alive and well. Neuron 24: 31–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray C, Koenig P, Engel A, Singer W (1989) Oscillatory responses in cat visual cortex exhibit inter-columnar synchronization which reflects global stimulus properties. Nature 338: 334–337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grinsted A, Moore J, Jevrejeva S (2004a) Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Process. Geophys. 11: 561–566.Google Scholar
  25. Grinsted A, Moore J, Jevrejeva S (2004b) Cross wavelet and wavelet coherence Matlab toolbox. research/waveletcoherence/.Google Scholar
  26. Huang N, Chern C, Huang K, Salvino L, Long S, Fan K (2001) A new spectral representation of earthquake data: Hilbert spectral analysis of Station TCU129, Chi-Chi, Taiwan, 21 September, 1999. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91(5): 1310–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang N, Shen S (2005) Hilbert-Huang transform and its applications. Interdisciplinary Mathematical Sciences - Volume 5. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Huang N, Shen Z, Long S, Wu M, Shih H, Zheng Q, Yen N-C, Tung C, Liu H (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 454: 903–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang N, Wu M-L, Qu W, Long S, Shen S, Zhang J (2003) Applications of Hilbert-Huang transform to non-stationary financial time series analysis. Appl. Stoch. Models Bus. Ind. 19: 245–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jiruska P, Proks J, Drbal O, Sovka P, Marusic P, Mares P (2005) Comparison of different methods of time shift measurement in EEG. Physiol. Res. 54: 459–465.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (1991) Principles of Neural Science, 3rd edn. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, CT.Google Scholar
  32. Kaplan D (1996) Surrogate Data. Nonlinear Time Series Software. Macalaster College, Minnesota website at Scholar
  33. Kiebel SJ, Tallon-Baudry C, Friston K (2005) Parametric analysis of oscillatory activity as measured with EEG/MEG. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26: 170–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klimesch W (1995) Memory processing described as brain oscillations in the EEG-alpha and theta bands. Psycoloquy 6(6).Google Scholar
  35. Koenig P, Engel A, Roelfsema P, Singer W (1995) How precise is neuronal synchronization? Neural Comput. 7: 469–485.Google Scholar
  36. Lachaux JP, Lutz A, Rudrauf D, Cosmelli D, Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Varela F (2002) Estimating the time-course of coherence between single-trial brain signals: An introduction to wavelet coherence. Neurophysiol. Clin. 32(1–3): 157–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Le Van Quyen M, Martinerie J, Varela F (2000) Studying single trials of phase synchronous activity in the brain. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 10: 2429–2439.Google Scholar
  38. Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela F (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum. Brain Mapp. 8: 194–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Le Van Quyen M, Foucher J, Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Lutz A, Martinerie J, Varela F (2001) Comparison of Hilbert transform and wavelet methods for the analysis of neuronal synchrony. J. Neurosci. Methods 111: 83–98.Google Scholar
  40. Liang H, Bressler S, Buffalo E, Desimone R, Fries P (2005) Empirical mode decomposition of field potentials from macaque V4 in visual spatial attention. Biol. Cybern. 92: 380–392.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liang H, Lin Z, McCallum R (2000) Artifact reduction in electrogastrogram based on the empirical mode decomposition method. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 38: 35–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magrin-Chagnolleau I, Baraniuk R (1999) Empirical mode decomposition based time-frequency attributes. In: Proceedings of the 69th SEG Meeting. Houston, Texas, USA, vol. 18, pp. 1949–1952.Google Scholar
  43. McKeown M, Saab R, Abu-Gharbieh R (2005) A combined independent component analysis (ICA)/empirical mode decomposition (EMD) method to infer cortico-muscular coupling. In: Conference on Neural Engineering. Proceedings of the 2nd International IEEE EMBS. Arlington, Virginia, pp. 679–682.Google Scholar
  44. Menon V, Freeman W, Cutillo B, Desmond J, Ward M, Bressler SL, Laxer K, Barbaro N, Gevins A (1996) Spatio-temporal correlations in human gamma band electrocortigrams. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 98: 89–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miltner W, Braun C, Arnold M, Witte H, Taub E (1999) Coherence of gamma-band EEG activity as a basis for associative learning. Nature 397: 434–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pare D, Curro”Dossi R, Steriade M (1990) Neuronal basis of the parkinsonian resting tremor: a hypothesis and its implications for treatment. Neuroscience 35: 217–226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pfurtscheller G, Schoegl A (2003) The BCI competition 2003. Dept. of Med. Informatics, Graz University of Technology. Website via Scholar
  48. Pradhan N, Dutt D, Satyam S (1993) A mimetic-based frequency domain technique for automatic generation of EEG reports. Comput. Biol. Med. 23(1): 15–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Quian Quiroga R, Kraskov A, Kreuz T, Grassberger P (2002) Performance of different synchronization measures in real data: A case study on electroencephalographic signals. Phys. Rev. E 65: 041903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rilling G, Flandrin P, Goncalves P (2003) On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In: IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP-03.Google Scholar
  51. Rodriguez E, George N, Lachaux J-P, Martinerie J, Ranault B, Varela F (1999) Perception”s shadow: long-distance synchronization of human brain activity. Nature 397: 430–433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Roelfsema P, Engel A, Koenig P, Singer W (1997) Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas. Nature 385: 157–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A, Kurths J, Schaefer C, Tass P (2001) Phase synchronization: from theory to data analysis (Chapter 9). Vol. 4, Neuroinformatics of Handbook of Biological Physics. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  54. Rosenblum M, Pikovsky A, Kurths J (2001) Phase synchronization and coupled oscillators. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.-I 44(10): 874–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saab R, McKeown M, Myers L, Abu-Gharbich R (2005) A wavelet based approach for the detection of coupling in EEG signals. In: 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering. Arlington, Virginia, pp. 616–320.Google Scholar
  56. Schiff SJ, So P, Chang T, Burke RE, Sauer T (1996) Detecting dynamical interdependence and generalized synchrony through mutual prediction in a neural ensemble. Phys. Rev. E 54(6): 6708–6724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schreiber T, Schmitz A (1996) Improved surrogate data for nonlinearity tests. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77(4): 635–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz M, Bennett W, Stein S (1966) Communication Systems and Techniques. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Google Scholar
  59. Shiavi R (1991) Introduction to Applied Statistical Signal Analysis. Richard D. Irwin, Inc., and Aksen Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  60. Singer W, Gray C (1995) Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18: 555–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Srinivasan R, Russell D, Edelman G, Tononi G (1999) Increased synchronization of neuromagnetic responses during conscious perception. J. Neurosci. 19: 5435–5448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Sweeney-Reed CM, Andrade A, Nasuto S (2004) Empirical mode decomposition of EEG signals for synchronisation analysis. In: IEEE EMBSS UKRI Postgraduate Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics. Southampton, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
  63. Sweeney-Reed CM, Howroyd JD, Andrade ADO, Nasuto SJ (2005) Empirical mode decomposition for isolation of neural assemblies underlying cognitive acts. In: IEEE EMBSS UKRI Postgraduate Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics. University of Reading, UK, pp. 21–22.Google Scholar
  64. Tass P, Rosenblum M, Weule J, Kurths J, Pikovsky A, Volkmann J, Schnitzler A, Freund H-J (1998) Detection of n:m phase locking from noisy data: application of magnetoencephalography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(15): 3291–3294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer J (1992) Testing for nonlineaity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 85(77).Google Scholar
  66. Torrence C, Compo G (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 79(1): 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Torrence C, Webster P (1999) Interdecadal changes in the ENSO-monsoon system. J. Climatol. 12: 2679–2690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Varela F (1995) Resonant cell assemblies. A new approach to cognitive function and neural synchrony. Biol. Res. 28: 81–95.Google Scholar
  69. Varela F, Lachaux J-P, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J (2001) The brainweb: phase synchronisation and large-scale integration. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 2: 228–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Whitton J, Lue F, Moldofsky H (1978) A spectral method for removing eye-movement artefacts from the EEG. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 44: 735–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu Z, Huang N (2004) A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 460: 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cybernetics, School of Systems EngineeringThe University of ReadingReading BerkshireUK

Personalised recommendations