Advertisement

Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 333–342 | Cite as

Surprising Effects of Synaptic Excitation

  • Jonathan E. RubinEmail author
Article

Abstract

Typically, excitatory synaptic coupling is thought of as an influence that accelerates and propagates firing in neuronal networks. This paper reviews recent results explaining how, contrary to these expectations, the presence of excitatory synaptic coupling can drastically slow oscillations in a network and how localized, sustained activity can arise in a network with purely excitatory coupling, without sustained inputs. These two effects stem from interactions of excitatory coupling with two different forms of intrinsic neuronal dynamics, and both serve to highlight the fact that the influence of synaptic coupling in a network depends strongly on the intrinsic properties of cells in the network.

Keywords

synaptic excitation firing frequency delayed escape way-in way-out function canard localized activity go surface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott LF, Regehr WG (2004) Synaptic computation. Nature 431: 796–803.Google Scholar
  2. Amari S (1977) Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral–-inhibition type neural fields. Biol. Cybern. 27: 77–87.Google Scholar
  3. Baer SM, Erneux T, Rinzel J (1989) The slow passage through a Hopf bifurcation: Delay, memory effects, and resonance. SIAM J. Appl. Math 49: 55–71.Google Scholar
  4. Butera RJ, Rinzel J, Smith JC (1999) Models of respiratory rhythm generation in the pre-Bötzinger complex. II. Populations of coupled pacemaker neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 398–415.Google Scholar
  5. Diener M (1984) The canard unchained or how fast/slow dynamical systems bifurcate. Math. Intell. 6(3): 38–49.Google Scholar
  6. Drover JD, Ermentrout B (2003) Nonlinear coupling near a degenerate Hopf (Bautin) bifurcation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 63: 1627–1647.Google Scholar
  7. Drover J, Rubin J, Su J, Ermentrout B (2005) Analysis of a canard mechanism by which excitatory synaptic coupling can synchronize neurons at low firing frequencies. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 65: 65–92.Google Scholar
  8. Ermentrout B (1996) Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Comput. 8: 979–1001.Google Scholar
  9. Ermentrout B (2002) Simulating, Analyzing, and Animating Dynamical Systems: A Guide to XPPAUT for Researchers and Students. SIAM, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  10. Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C (1993) Phase dynamics for weakly coupled Hodgkin-Huxley neurons. Europhys. Lett. 23: 367.Google Scholar
  11. Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C (1995) Synchrony in excitatory neural networks. Neural Comput. 7: 307–337.Google Scholar
  12. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of the membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerves. J. Physiol (Lond.) 117: 500–544.Google Scholar
  13. Hoppensteadt FC, Izhikevich EM (1997) Weakly Connected Neural Networks. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  14. Izhikevich E (2000). Subcritical elliptic bursting of Bautin type. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 60: 503–535.Google Scholar
  15. Kopell N, Somers D (1995) Anti-phase solutions in relaxation oscillators coupled through excitatory interactions. J. Math. Biol. 33: 261–280.Google Scholar
  16. Kuske R, Baer S (2002) Asymptotic analysis of noise sensitivity in a neuronal burster. Bull. Math. Biol. 64: 447–481.Google Scholar
  17. Morris C, Lecar H (1981) Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. Biophys. J. 35: 193–213.Google Scholar
  18. Neishtadt AI (1987) On delayed stability loss under dynamical bifurcations I. J. Diff. Eqn. 23: 1385–1390.Google Scholar
  19. Neishtadt AI (1988) On delayed stability loss under dynamical bifurcations II. J. Diff. Eqn. 24: 171–176.Google Scholar
  20. Renart A, Song P, Wang X-J (2003) Robust spatial working memory through homeostatic synaptic scaling in heterogeneous cortical networks. Neuron 38: 473–485.Google Scholar
  21. Rinzel J (1985) Excitation dynamics: Insights from simplified membrane models. Fed. Proc. 44: 2944–2946.Google Scholar
  22. Rinzel J (1987) A formal classification of bursting mechanisms in excitable systems. In: AM Gleason, ed. Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians. AMS, Providence, RI, pp. 1578–1593.Google Scholar
  23. Rinzel J, Ermentrout GB (1998) Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations. In: C Koch, I Segev, eds. Methods in Neuronal Modeling: From Ions to Networks, second edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 251–291.Google Scholar
  24. Rubin J, Bose A (2004) Localized activity patterns in excitatory neuronal networks. Network: Comp. Neural Sys. 15: 133– 158.Google Scholar
  25. Rubin J, Terman D (2002) Geometric singular perturbation analysis of neuronal dynamics. In: B. Fiedler, ed. Handbook of Dynamical Systems, Vol. 2 Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 93–146.Google Scholar
  26. Rubin J, Terman D, Chow C (2001) Localized bumps of activity sustained by inhibition in a two-layer thalamic network. J. Comp. Neurosci. 10: 313–331.Google Scholar
  27. Rubin JE, Troy WC (2004) Sustained spatial patterns of activity in neuronal populations without recurrent excitation. SIAM J. Appl. Math 64: 1609–1635.Google Scholar
  28. Somers D, Kopell N (1993) Rapid synchronization through fast threshold modulation. Biol. Cybern. 68: 393–407.Google Scholar
  29. Su J, Rubin J, Terman D (2004) Effects of noise on elliptic bursters. Nonlinearity 17: 133–157.Google Scholar
  30. Szmolyan P, Wechselberger M (2001) Canards in ℝ3. J. Diff. Eqn. 177: 419–453.Google Scholar
  31. Wang X-J, Rinzel J (1995) Oscillatory and bursting properties of neurons. In: MA Arbib, ed. Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 689–691.Google Scholar
  32. Wechselberger M (2004) Existence and bifurcation of canards in ℝ3 in the case of a folded node. Preprint.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson HR, Cowan JD (1973) A mathematical theory of the functional dynamics of cortical and thalamic nervous tissue. Kybernetic 13: 55–80.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Center for the Neural Basis of CognitionUniversity of PittsburghPittsburgh

Personalised recommendations