Journal of Computational Neuroscience

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 311–321

Dynamics of the Instantaneous Firing Rate in Response to Changes in Input Statistics



We review and extend recent results on the instantaneous firing rate dynamics of simplified models of spiking neurons in response to noisy current inputs. It has been shown recently that the response of the instantaneous firing rate to small amplitude oscillations in the mean inputs depends in the large frequency limit f on the spike initiation dynamics. A particular simplified model, the exponential integrate-and-fire (EIF) model, has a response that decays as 1/f in the large frequency limit and describes very well the response of conductance-based models with a Hodgkin-Huxley type fast sodium current. Here, we show that the response of the EIF instantaneous firing rate also decays as 1/f in the case of an oscillation in the variance of the inputs for both white and colored noise. We then compute the initial transient response of the firing rate of the EIF model to a step change in its mean inputs and/or in the variance of its inputs. We show that in both cases the response speed is proportional to the neuron stationary firing rate and inversely proportional to a ‘spike slope factor’ ΔT that controls the sharpness of spike initiation: as 1/ΔT for a step change in mean inputs, and as 1/ΔT2 for a step change in the variance in the inputs.


integrate-and-fire neuron noise dynamical response spiking mechanism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson JS, Lampl I, Gillespie DC, Ferster D (2000) The contribution of noise to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex. Science 290: 1968–1972.Google Scholar
  2. Brunel N, Chance F, Fourcaud N, Abbott L (2001) Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neurons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86: 2186–2189.Google Scholar
  3. Brunel N, Hakim V, Richardson M (2003) Firing rate resonance in a generalized integrate-and-fire neuron with subthreshold resonance. Phys. Rev. E 67: 051916.Google Scholar
  4. Brunel N, Latham P (2003) Firing rate of noisy quadratic integrate-and-fire neurons. Neural Comput. 15: 2281–2306.Google Scholar
  5. Brunel N, Sergi S (1998) Firing frequency of integrate-and-fire neurons with finite synaptic time constants. J. Theor. Biol. 195: 87–95.Google Scholar
  6. Destexhe A, Paré D (1999) Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol. 81: 1531–1547.Google Scholar
  7. Ermentrout B (1998) Linearization of F-I curves by adaptation. Neural Comput 10: 1721–1729.Google Scholar
  8. Ermentrout B, Pascal M, Gutkin B (2001) The effects of spike frequency adaptation and negative feedback on the synchronization of neural oscillators. Neural Comput. 13: 1285–310.Google Scholar
  9. Ermentrout GB (1996) Type I membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony. Neural Comput. 8: 979–1001.Google Scholar
  10. Ermentrout GB, Kopell N (1986) Parabolic bursting in an excitable system coupled with a slow oscillation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 46: 233–253.Google Scholar
  11. Fourcaud N, Brunel N (2002) Dynamics of firing probability of noisy integrate-and-fire neurons. Neural Comput. 14: 2057–2110.Google Scholar
  12. Fourcaud-Trocme’ N, Hansel D, van Vreeswijk C, Brunel N (2003) How spike generation mechanisms determine the neuronal response to fluctuating inputs. J. Neurosci. 23: 11628–11640.Google Scholar
  13. Fuhrmann G, Markram H, Tsodyks M (2002) Spike frequency adaptation and neocortical rhythms. J. Neurophysiol. 88: 761–770.Google Scholar
  14. Gerstner W (2000) Population dynamics of spiking neurons: Fast transients, asynchronous states, and locking. Neural Comput. 12: 43–89.Google Scholar
  15. Gerstner W, Kistler WM (2002) Spiking Neuron Models: Single Neurons, Populations, Plasticity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gutkin B, Ermentrout GB (1998) Dynamics of membrane excitability determine interspike interval variability: A link between spike generation mechanisms and cortical spike train statistics. Neural Comp. 10: 1047–1065.Google Scholar
  17. Hansel D, Mato G (2003) Asynchronous states and the emergence of synchrony in large networks of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Neural Comp. 15: 1–56.Google Scholar
  18. Izhikevich EM (2001) Resonate-and-fire neurons. Neural Networks 14: 883–894.Google Scholar
  19. Izhikevich EM (2003) Simple model of spiking neurons. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 14: 1569–1572.Google Scholar
  20. Knight BW (1972) Dynamics of encoding in a population of neurons. J. Gen. Physiol. 59: 734–766.Google Scholar
  21. Koendgen H, Geisler C, Wang XJ, Fusi S, Luescher HR, Giugliano M (2004) The dynamical response of single cells to noisy time-varying currents. In: Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, pp. 640.9.Google Scholar
  22. La Camera G, Rauch A, Luscher HR, Senn W, Fusi S (2004) Minimal models of adapted neuronal responses to in-vivo like input currents. Neural Comp. 16: 2101–2124.Google Scholar
  23. Lapicque L (1907) Recherches quantitatives sur l’excitabilité électrique des nerfs traitée comme une polarisation. J. Physiol. Pathol. Gen. 9: 620–635.Google Scholar
  24. Lindner B, Longtin A, Bulsara A (2003) Analytic expressions for rate and CV of a type I neuron driven by white gaussian noise. Neural Comp. 15: 1760–1787.Google Scholar
  25. Lindner B, Schimansky-Geier L (2001) Transmission of noise coded versus additive signals through a neuronal ensemble. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86: 2934–2937.Google Scholar
  26. Moreno R, Parga N (2004) Role of synaptic filtering on the firing response of simple model neurons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92: 028102.Google Scholar
  27. Naundorf B, Geisel T, Wolf F (2003) How fast can a neuron react to transient stimuli? preprint,, physics/0307135.Google Scholar
  28. Naundorf B, Geisel T, Wolf F (2004) Action potential onset dynamics and the response speed of neuronal populations. preprint.Google Scholar
  29. Rauch A, Camera GL, Lüscher H-R, Senn W, Fusi S (2003) Neocortical pyramidal cells respond as integrate-and-fire neurons to in vivo-like input currents. J. Neurophysiol. 90: 1598–1612.Google Scholar
  30. Richardson M, Brunel N, Hakim V (2003) From subthreshold to firing-rate resonance. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 2538–2554.Google Scholar
  31. Silberberg G, Bethge M, Markram H, Pawelzik K, Tsodyks M (2004) Dynamics of population rate code in ensemble of neocortical neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 91: 704–709.Google Scholar
  32. Tateno T, Harsch A, Robinson HP (2004) Threshold firing frequency-current relationships of neurons in rat somatosensory cortex: Type 1 and type 2 dynamics. J. Neurophysiol. 92: 2283–2294.Google Scholar
  33. Treves A (1993) Mean-field analysis of neuronal spike dynamics. Network 4: 259–284.Google Scholar
  34. Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to Theoretical Neurobiology. Cambridge, University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. van Vreeswijk C, Hansel D (2001) Patterns of synchrony in neural networks with spike adaptation. Neural Comput. 13: 959–992.Google Scholar
  36. Wang X-J, Buzsáki G (1996) Gamma oscillation by synaptic inhibition in a hippocampal interneuronal network model. J. Neurosci. 16: 6402–6413.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics, Center for Neural Basis of CognitionUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Laboratory of Neurophysics and PhysiologyUMR8119 CNRS - Université René DescartesParis Cedex 06France

Personalised recommendations